Take From the Poor, Give to the Military

[sasha031]

Where would the Bush administration be without terrorism? Like the Cold War before it, the “war on terror” is a conveniently sweeping rationale for all manner of irrational governance, such as the outrageous $2.77-trillion budget the president proposed to Congress on Monday.

Without terrorism, how could Bush justify to fiscal conservatives the whopping budget deficits that he has ballooned via his tax cuts for the wealthy that he now seeks to make permanent? Without terrorism, how could he convince government corruption watchdogs that the huge increases in military and homeland security — 7% and 8%, respectively — aren’t simply payback to the defense contractors who so heavily support the Republicans every election cycle? Without terrorism, how could the president get away with blindly dumping $120 billion more into the war in Afghanistan and the bungled occupation of Iraq that the Bush administration had once promised would be financed by Iraqi oil sales?

http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/20060207_bush_budget_military/

[Benhurst]

1. Bush is only doing what

Jesus would want him to do. Don't forget, he speaks directly to God from the Oval Office.

[WinkyDink]

2. I think you mean, "Give to Halliburton, and G.E., and G. D., and Bechtel,

and the Carlyle Group", no?

[unhappycamper]

4. You are correct. "Take from the poor, give to military industrial complex"

would be more accurate. It sure hasn't been going to protecting our troops.

[boobooday]

3. That's how you get the poor to join the military

Shortchange them on education, keep the minimum wage really low, make sure they don't have health care.

Then let the military offer them training, living wages, and health care.

Bingo.