I wrote it on Saturday in response to another letter, which itself was a response to Leonard Pitts' column titled "Bush once again playing on fears of U.S. public." It was published today.
The letter that prompted my letter was a typical right-wing letter that defended the illegal wiretapping with the unconstitutional argument of "the wiretapping is only a threat to those involved in terrorism. The rest of us should have no fear that our cherished freedoms will ever be endangered -- unless we permit the enemy to get the upper hand because we vacillated in defending ourselves."
Anyway, here is the cut and paste version of my letter and below are the links to my letter, the letter I responded to and Leonard Pitts' column that started this debate. They cut a couple of sentences out of my letter for space reasons, but they kept the gist of what I said.
Wiretap debateThe Feb. 4 letter Pitts exaggerates accused Leonard Pitts Jr. of giving us a ''worn-out liberal attack against the Bush administration.'' But the writer fails to acknowledge that several constitutional-law experts think that the president is violating U.S. law when he conducts wiretapping. Also, no al Qaeda suspect has been brought to justice because of the illegal wiretapping, according to FBI Director Robert Mueller.
The writer simply takes the president's word that if you are not involved in terrorism, you need not worry about the illegal wiretapping. Has he not learned by now that anything the president says means the exact opposite?
CARLOS MILLER, MiamiLink to my LTTE
http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/news/editorial/letters/13816893.htmLink to LTTE that prompted my letter
http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/news/editorial/letters/13789115.htmLink to Pitts' column
http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/13722836.htm