Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Do you think that SmirkyNuts threw all of his budget money

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Dees Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 05:39 PM
Original message
Do you think that SmirkyNuts threw all of his budget money
into the war and the DOD and such because it is so much easier for Repugs to steal money from these areas than health and education. There are some awfully fat contractors making some very good money on war and defense and I'm sure the kickback game is in full gear. Starve the beast and all that aside...isn't that why Reuggies are in government to begin with is to fatten their wallets?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sure. It goes directly to big, bloated business w/out competition.
and of courese largely exempt from things like bidding.

It is therefore exempt from the same rules applied to any other spending, that is, it is just throwing money at the problem, it seems like help but it isn't, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meti57b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. the ultimate goal is to bankrupt the federal gov't so that social programs
can not be funded now or in the foreseeable future. The federal government would be small and only military and probably so-called diplomatic functions would be funded.

Throwing away money in Iraq is a fast way to accomplish this goal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yes, yes and yes
Edited on Wed Feb-08-06 05:50 PM by MissWaverly
usually a war has this country humming, I am convinced that we will eventually find out
that the money was laundered thru phony defense contractors for covert activities by
at this time unknown individuals who had the blessing of those in key positions. Whether
it was to advance the neocon objectives or not, it is hard to say, but I believe much
money allocated was never spent on what it was budgeted for and many have paid dearly for this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
punpirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. That's certainly part of it...
... but one has to go back to the McKinley era to see the thinking that the `pugs have about defense. First, having a military around the world to protect corporate interests serves their purposes, too. Makes the world "safe" for US investment. The other reason is psychological--the wealthy are terrified of some cataclysm which will strip them of their wealth, whether that's an internal upheaval or an attack from outside (which is why unions have been assaulted in the country since their inception--and why they have always been associated with communism in the past century, even though unions in this country predated the Bolshevik revolution by several decades).

The robber baron mentality thinks that government is an interference to their operations and their wealth, except for defense--they think a "strong" defense will protect their wealth ("strong" meaning lots of money put into their defense industries, too). The rest of what government does, they'd like to kill--including health and education subsidies. That's been the conservative meme for a hundred or more years.

And, they want the general public to pay for their security, which is why there are so many tax plans afoot that generate enough revenue for defense by taxing the middle class and the poor, but not enough to pay for anything else.

It's all about preserving and increasing wealth. It's not just that the wealthy have big interests in defense firms, although that is part of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 05:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC