Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Blind Cal student sues Target - Web site cannot be used by the sightless

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Kadie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 06:06 PM
Original message
Blind Cal student sues Target - Web site cannot be used by the sightless
Blind Cal student sues Target
Suit charges retailer's Web site cannot be used by the sightless
Henry K. Lee, Chronicle Staff Writer

Wednesday, February 8, 2006


(02-08) 1215 PST OAKLAND -- A blind UC Berkeley student has filed a class-action lawsuit against Target Corp., saying the retailer is committing civil-rights violations because its Web site is inaccessible to those who cannot see.

The lawsuit, filed Tuesday in Alameda County Superior Court, said the upscale discounter's on-line business, target.com, denies blind Californians equal access to goods and services available to those who can see.

"Target thus excludes the blind from full and equal participation in the growing Internet economy that is increasingly a fundamental part of daily life," said the suit, which seeks to be certified as a class action and alleges violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act and various state statutes.

snip...
Blind people access Web sites by using keyboards in conjunction with screen-reading software which vocalizes visual information on a computer screen.

But Target's site lacks "alt-text," an invisible code embedded beneath a graphic on the Web site that a screen reader could use to provide a description of the image to a blind person, the suit said.


more...
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2006/02/08/MNGO7H4VBP128.DTL

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. That is just bad form.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cheezus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. ah, good ole 508 and WAI compliance
When I worked as a developer at the university, we made darn sure that our sites went above and beyond the current legal requirements for three reasons

1 - it's just the right thing to do
2 - validating is a matter of pride
3 - you get a better understanding of code and layout when you keep accessibility in mind


that said, it wasn't cheap! a lot of man-hours went into it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissMarple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Was this an unfortunate oversight, or did they just not care?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kadie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Target declined to modify their web-site
from the article

snip...
Basrawi said the plaintiffs began negotiating with Target after writing the retailer in May 2005. But talks broke down last month, and the company, whom the attorney described as "one of the biggest offenders," declined to modify its Web site.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissMarple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Oops, a major oops. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
philosophie_en_rose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. learn something new everyday.
I didn't know about alt-text. Sounds pretty simple, not to mention good for business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tn-guy Donating Member (224 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I wonder if DU has this "alt-text" capability. Anyone know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Yep
Select "View Source" in your browser. Alt-text in image tags looks like this:

alt="Democratic Underground"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 08:14 AM
Response to Reply #7
18. "Hover" over pictures. If a little text box appears...
Edited on Thu Feb-09-06 08:24 AM by Tesha
"Hover" over any of the pictures. If a little text box appears, that's
the "alt" (alternate presentation) text associated with that picture.
For some small pictures, my browser doesn't appear to display the
alt text (and I note from the source that the text is wrong on several
icons (shown below); note that they all say "Printer-friendly format"!

Tesha

=======

<tr><td valign="bottom" class="smalltext">

<a href="duboard.php?az=printer_friendly&forum=364&topic_id=367585">
<img src="images/printer_friendly.gif" border="0" width="22" height="12" alt="Printer-friendly format"></a>
<a href="duboard.php?az=printer_friendly&forum=364&topic_id=367585" class="smallblack">
Printer-friendly format</a><br>

<a href="duboard.php?az=email_to_friend&forum=364&topic_id=367585">
<img src="images/email_to_friend.gif" border="0" width="22" height="12" alt="Printer-friendly format"></a>
<a href="duboard.php?az=email_to_friend&forum=364&topic_id=367585" class="smallblack">
Email this thread to a friend</a><br>

<a href="duboard.php?az=bookmark&forum=364&topic_id=367585">
<img src="images/bookmark.gif" border="0" width="22" height="12" alt="Printer-friendly format"></a>
<a href="duboard.php?az=bookmark&forum=364&topic_id=367585" class="smallblack">
Bookmark this thread</a></td>

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denese Donating Member (247 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #7
21. it does
My 18 year old son, totally blind, reads DU all the time.
Denese
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. Alt-text is the easiest thing in the world to add
It's just text that shows up onscreen before a picture loads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. Oh good. How long before other websites are targeted? Such as
www.adultbuddyfinder.com (not quite a real name of a matchmaking site)... indeed, there's a lot no amount of ALT text could even begin to compensate for... :crazy:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
8. Uh, how does he KNOW about it if it's inaccessable?
Maybe he should sue Jesus because he can't experience a sunset...
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lectrobyte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. Probably because every other website out there is accessible...
How do you think blind people surf the web? Google up screenreader and thank me for helping you learn about something new today. The one my friend used was called Jaws. Works pretty well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. No offense intended, I guess I was being a little snarky though. Sorry.
...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
9. Why Doesn't He Just Pay The Lawyer To Read The Stuff To Him.
Edited on Wed Feb-08-06 10:52 PM by OPERATIONMINDCRIME
He could save money on legal expenses, get what he wants and wouldn't have to waste people's friggin time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 05:42 AM
Response to Reply #9
15. Because, of course, he's the only blind person in the world
Edited on Thu Feb-09-06 05:43 AM by muriel_volestrangler
so it's better to get the lawyer to just help that one person, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 05:49 AM
Response to Original message
16. they should do a website in braille.
think about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
T_Matamoro Donating Member (47 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 06:44 AM
Response to Original message
17. godd and bad.
i think that hadicapped should have access BUT where does it end? Why is it always about sueing and lawyers? What about other languages? noone who speaks a language that is not present on the website can access the site either. Should i sue cause they dont have acces for people who speak Klingon or esparanto???? :argh: Speaking of, anyone ever hook up to Klingon google?? it's funny as hell, nerdz rulez! ps you need klingon character support, hee-hee. :silly: KAPLA!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #17
23. I think it might end where business crosses line from employing X amount
of people and has Y amount of stores and generates Z amount of revenue annually.

Large corporations benefit greatly from our Fed, State and Local Tax Dollars.

They have the resources to make their stores and websites accessible from the get-go.

It's not like a small Mom & Pop store that'd have to shell out mega-bucks retrofitting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
19. Utter nonsense...
while he's at it he ought to sue web-only retailers for 'violating the civil rights' of people who don't have internet access.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PabloLego Donating Member (50 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
20. get a life not a lawyer
Just a thought but why not take his business to another retailer who IS accomodating to individuals experiencing disability? Why sue? (I know I know...It's California. It's what they do there.) It's not like Target is the only store out there with a website. Sheesh get a life not a lawyer! by the way does this website coded IAW the ADA? Hmmm?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #20
24. Because ALL Corporations Benefit Greatly From Our Collective Tax Dollars
Edited on Thu Feb-09-06 09:26 AM by cryingshame
And there are laws about large corporations making their establishments accessible to the handicap.

It's the LEAST Target and big box stores can do... After putting America's Neighborhood stores out of business and gutting our down towns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
22. Been watching this and other cases with interest
I'm a webmaster for mostly governmental and non-profit entities. All of them have taken a "wait and see" approach to how ADA would be applied, if at all, to their web presence.

Most webmasters (at least the ones I've met through conference and other seminars) have done what they can, within their budgets, to keep their sites as accessible as possible. The problem is there are no laws or guidelines as to what is acceptable.

For instance, one government I'm contracted with launched an ADA Commission which accepts recommendations from the public. This has resulted in cut-down curbs, wheelchair ramps and so-forth. We've only had one sight-limited person come to the committee and speak about the web presence. That person requested we allow for user-controlled text. That is, a button which would allow text size to increase or decrease based on the user's preference. It was easy enough to initiate.

For the most part, webmasters just try to build their sites as downward compatible as possible and hope for the best (that the persons having difficulty accessing the sites will come to the entity before launching a lawsuit).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC