Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lehrer asks Cheney about oil

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 07:22 PM
Original message
Lehrer asks Cheney about oil
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/white_house/jan-june06/cheney_02-07.html

<snip>

JIM LEHRER: As you know, Mr. Vice President, it's common knowledge, or conventional wisdom -- let's put it that way -- that if you really want to stop the addiction that you can do it quickly one or two ways or a combination. First of all raise the mileage standards dramatically on cars, and the other just to slap a federal -- increase the federal gasoline tax. That would put people out of their cars or reduce the addiction. But the administration is against both of those ideas, right?

VICE PRESIDENT DICK CHENEY: Correct.

JIM LEHRER: Now why?

VICE PRESIDENT DICK CHENEY: We have raised the mileage standard in the past as part of the last energy bill. We also believe -- I believe that the -- from the standpoint of efficiency, that we have over time gotten to be much more efficient users, if you will, of energy.

If you look back to 1980 -- 25 years ago, roughly -- we used twice as much energy as we do today per unit of output in our economy. We've gotten twice as efficient. That's in part a response to market forces, to the cost of energy, the fact that prices have gone up and people have adjusted accordingly.

We are generally not enthusiastic about big tax increases. Big tax increases impose burdens on the economy, and the money being taken out of the hands of private citizens and spent by government, and government oftentimes doesn't spend it nearly as efficiently or as effectively from the standpoint of long-term economic growth and the creation of jobs and so forth as will the private sector. So we have generally resisted and I think will continue to resist the notion that a solution to our gasoline problem, for example, is a big tax on gasoline.

JIM LEHRER: So it's an ideology problem, right?

VICE PRESIDENT DICK CHENEY: No, it's a philosophy problem.

JIM LEHRER: That's what I meant.

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. So stopping gas wastage isn't worth tax increases
because that will put more money in the hands of the evil government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnnInLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. If his mouth is open -----
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC