Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Should DU send candidates a questionnaire and post their responses?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-02-06 09:35 PM
Original message
Poll question: Should DU send candidates a questionnaire and post their responses?
NOTE: I posted this earlier and it accidentally ended up in archives

DU has over 80,000 members, and probably many of us email news clippings and our opinions to even more people.


I have seen ideas discussed here finally bubble up into the mainstream discussion.

In short, we can shape the political discourse.

One way to do this is to ask questions of candidates so we can either endorse them, post a DU score for them, or at least post their answers. Ideally, this would be on questions that webpages like project vote smart don't cover.

Some possible questions:


    WAR

  • If you voted for the Iraq War Resolution, why did you do so? (please do NOT mention terrorism, WMD, or spreading democracy. DU members are generally not retarded)

  • How should consistent poll results showing that 60-80% of Iraqis want us to pull out our troops as soon as possible effect our Iraq policy?

  • Do you think that cancelling Iraq's oil contracts with Russia and France and replacing them with American companies, denationalizing their oil industry and restructuring it to suit the demands of our oil companies is a war crime?

    Do you think that doing this and putting Bush stooge Ahmed Chalabi in the oil ministry is likely to increase or decrease animosity toward the US in Iraq and the Middle East?

  • Do you support using our military to gain hegemony over the world's oil supply?

  • Would you support prosecuting as war criminals the boards of directors and corporate officers of businesses that successfully lobby Congress and the White House to commit military actions so they can profit?

  • Which uses of our military to invade or attack other countries in the last 50 years were probably not justifiable in your opinion and why?

  • In the last 50 years, which uses of our intelligence services to overthrow democratically elected governments were justified, which were not, and why? (you can just give an example of one each if you want)

  • In the last 50 years, which dictators were we justified in supporting and which do you think were unjustifiable?

  • Why would a country with a handful of nuclear weapons attack detonate one in the United States or give one to a terrorist group that would do so when they know that doing so would trigger overwhelming retaliation from our arsenal of 10,000 warheads? How do you sift legitimate security concerns against opportunistic scare tactics that have been used against the American public?

  • Do you support the use of mercenaries to interrogate prisoners and provide security as has been done in Bosnia and now Iraq? How do we hold these people responsible for their actions as we do the military with the UCMJ?

    9/11 & TERRORISM

  • Which of the changes to our intelligence services, military procedures, and civil rights would have prevented 9/11 if they had been in place before the attack? Please be very specific about both changes to policy and the relevant details of the 9/11 attack and planning.

  • No public statement has been made about who sold stock short before 9/11. Will you demand that those parties be investigated, prosecuted, and the results made public?

  • Would you support another 9/11 investigation conducted people NOT connected to Wall Street, the defense industry, oil companies, and others who profited from the attack?

    In particular, would you support public testimony from NORAD pilots and others on any change in scramble procedures and wargames that were going on the day of 9/11?

    Our F-15 and F-16s, can get off the ground with a few minutes notice from a cold start, climb to 50,000 feet in a minute, and travel at up to twice the speed of sound.


    The hijacked airliners on 9/11 flew unmolested for nearly two hours in the most densely populated part of the United States and what should be the most heavily guarded areas including Washington, DC.

    The only two fighters sent to intercept them were traveling at between 400-500 mph, slower than most commercial airliners fly.

  • In addition to killing or arresting those who commit acts of terrorism, what can we do to make people less likely to join terrorist groups?

    ENERGY

  • Do you believe that our oil supply is finite, and must be replaced with other forms of energy? If so, which energy alternatives do you support and what concrete steps will you take toward making those happen?

    FOREIGN POLICY & TRADE

  • Do you support neoliberalism (bankrupting Third World countries to make them vulnerable to forced privatization of government services and forcing severe cuts in social services) as a foreign policy? If not, what concrete steps have you taken to oppose it?

  • What would you do to make our trade agreements more beneficial to American workers and protect the rights of workers and farmers in other countries? How would you structure trade agreements so that they don't negate democracy in the countries affected including ours?


    CORPORATIONS vs. PUBLIC GOOD


  • Would you be willing to anger big pharma and insurance companies in order to control costs and make medical care accessible to all Americans? What would you do to rein in those two industries?

  • What would you do to counter the trend of businesses, especially corporations, relying on underpaid part time workers and temps who often get no benefits or job security?

  • How would you reduce the influence of corporate America on our political process or at least balance it with the interest of average Americans?

  • How will you restructure our tax system to make the wealthy and corporations pay their fair share?

    EDUCATION

  • Do you support smaller class size and better pay for teachers as the bare minimum for beginning to fix our K-12 education system?

    If you supported No Child Left behind or other right wing education "reforms" how did you think testing kids endlessly without giving them or their teachers the money to correct problems would work? How did you think demanding higher standards for teachers and micromanaging their work would help when schools are already having a hard time attracting smart, motivated people?

  • What will you do to make higher education more accessible and affordable?


    CORRUPTION

  • What should be done to stop the revolving door between Congress & the Pentagon and the lobbying firms and corporations they work with?

  • Do you believe that government agencies should be allowed to hire union busting lawyers and consultants with our tax dollars? What will you do to stop this?

  • Do you support public financing of political campaigns? If not, what steps would you take to curb the severe corruption of elected officials at all levels of government?

  • Would you support the GAO or another independent oversight agency analyzing legislation to see which businesses profit from it, who they lobbied, who they donated money to, and whether they actually wrote portions of the legislation?

  • Would you support mandatory labeling on legislation written by lobbyists, including aides and elected officials who worked as lobbyists?

  • What would you do to curb the cronyism that occurs at all levels of government in both parties, particularly in the awarding of contracts?


    CIVIL RIGHTS

  • What would you do to make us confident that our votes will be counted accurately, and that no one is unfairly barred from voting?

    Do you support paper ballots, hand counted or at least open source, inspectable software for any electronic voting equipment used?

  • What will you do to restore the due process rights of Americans such as habeas corpus and requiring warrants for wiretaps? What should be done with government officials who violated these?

    SECRECY & OPEN GOVERNMENT

  • What would you do to strengthen enforcement of the Freedom of Information Act?

  • What would you do to curb the arbitrary use of classifying documents?



  • Obviously, this is far from exhaustive, and includes some idiosyncratic stuff, but you could add to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-02-06 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think it is a great idea!
We should make this happen. It would definitely give us a greater presence in the political world. DU is becoming increasingly influential & this is a natural step in the maturation process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-02-06 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. Kick and thanks for reposting
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rosesaylavee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-02-06 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yes, and post their answers in
the Research Forum. It would be great as a reference and we can stop the bickering over which potential candidate said what when where.

Excellent idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-02-06 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. use research forum to find statements and actions on DU issues
That won't necessarily be scored by other groups.

That could fill in gaps on people who choose not to respond.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rosesaylavee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-03-06 07:42 AM
Response to Reply #4
26. Not sure I understand.
Are you saying not to use the research forum for statements by candidates?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-03-06 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #26
30. If you dig up statements AND/OR legislation, yes. maybe demopedia
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DiverDave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-02-06 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
5. You bet you\we should do this
and post the results on the FRONT PAGE!

We need answers, dammit, and we need to shout them from the rooftops.

Recommended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ncrainbowgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-02-06 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
6. Yes- but if I were running, I'd never fill this out. (as it stands now)
Edited on Mon Jan-02-06 10:00 PM by ncrainbowgrrl
It's too specific. (Personally, I'd love to know the answer to most of these questions from every candidate running.) However, when doing endorsements, questions need to be short and specific.

Ex: Do you support the use of mercenaries to interrogate prisoners and provide security as has been done in Bosnia and now Iraq? How do we hold these people responsible for their actions as we do the military with the UCMJ?


Excellent question. :thumbsup: But it's too wordy. Proposed "dumbed down" Solution:



1. Do you support the use of mercenaries to interrogate prisoners? Yes___ No_____ Other________________________________


if yes: Can we hold these people responsible for their actions as we do the military with the UCMJ? Yes___ No_____ Other________________________________


etc...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-02-06 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Good idea. You can do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-02-06 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Sadly, if Q's aren't this specific, answers will be useless platitudes
Most pols are masters of saying nothing with a lot of fucking words.

This stuff gets to the heart of things, and the specificity will make it more obvious if they weasel out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ncrainbowgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-02-06 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. True. But sometimes, especially in primaries
it's better to know at least SOMETHING about the candidates. If there are 2 or 3 dems running, and one fills out the questionnaire in a manner that is more appealing to my interests, I'd be more inclined to support their candidacy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-02-06 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. better to ask hard Q and let them go
Soft than start soft and have no hope of a substantive response.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ncrainbowgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-02-06 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. a couple more "shorter questions"
What should be done to stop the revolving door between Congress & the Pentagon and the lobbying firms and corporations they work with?

Do you believe that government agencies should be allowed to hire union busting lawyers and consultants with our tax dollars? What will you do to stop this?

Do you support public financing of political campaigns? If not, what steps would you take to curb the severe corruption of elected officials at all levels of government?

Would you support the GAO or another independent oversight agency analyzing legislation to see which businesses profit from it, who they lobbied, who they donated money to, and whether they actually wrote portions of the legislation?

Would you support mandatory labeling on legislation written by lobbyists, including aides and elected officials who worked as lobbyists?

What would you do to curb the cronyism that occurs at all levels of government in both parties, particularly in the awarding of contracts?



Revised Questions


1. Should anything be done to stop the revolving door between Congress, the Pentagon and the lobbying firms and corporations they work with? Y/N/DK

2. Do you believe that government agencies can hire union busting lawyers and consultants with our tax dollars? Y/N/DK
IF NO: What will you do to stop this?

3. Would you support public financing of political campaigns? Y/N/DK

4. Do you feel that steps need to be taken to curb the severe corruption of elected officials at all levels of government? Y/N/DK


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-02-06 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. Great! some need, "if so,what would you do?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-02-06 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
7. a very good idea
The questions as written could not be answered by any true hopeful. But I think that some carefully crafted questions could signal intent vis a vis progressive proclivities...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tulsakatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-02-06 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
8. it's a GREAT idea!!!
With 80,000 members, we certainly could have some influence over an election.

I do find some great articles here and I also send them on to my friends who, I know, will appreciate them. I've also written to my Senators and representatives from to time with my opinions (mostly on the war). These people are all Republicans who don't agree with me. They have also responded to me but they basically just give me the impression that I am just a stupid voter and that they don't agree with me.

If they do respond to the questionnaire, please post their responses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntiBush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-02-06 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
11. Yes & Post Them All!
If for no other reason than to let others know what Dem's stand-for.

And to show we hold our elected officials accountable. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-02-06 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
14. I like your idea...
and don't have any problem with the wording. If a representative chooses not to answer straight-forward questions....that is revealing enough to me. If it's just to be another exercise in bull...it defeats the purpose and demeans the intellect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CantGetFooledAgain Donating Member (635 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-02-06 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
16. GREAT idea!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LuckyTheDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-02-06 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
17. Endorsements
Doing endorsements is a good idea. But I think it would require a change in the way DU is structured or the creation of a separate, affiliated group with an elected board, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-03-06 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. that would be a bigger challenge.
We could ask Duers to vote on questions and set a minimum number like 2/3 to include the question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-02-06 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
19. i bet there are already some good questionnaires out there
developing a good instrument is a big job. getting people around here to even stick to the question can be a chore. i would say find someone who has done this already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-03-06 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. find the best ones and post
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LincolnMcGrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-03-06 12:21 AM
Response to Original message
21. No Labor Questions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-03-06 02:31 AM
Response to Reply #21
25. I had one on public union busting--got any to add?
my points on trade agreements touched on that indirectly too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skids Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-03-06 01:27 AM
Response to Original message
23. How to decide the questions...

Post a thread, people put questions as replies -- vote for a question by tacking on a reply to it.

Then take the top vote getters and run some runoff polls.

Do note that pols aren't going to write us a book. Limit it to 10 of the best questions.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-03-06 02:28 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. I wonder if this would work as a Demopedia project or something like that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DiverDave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-03-06 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
27. Kick for a good idea.
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-03-06 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
28. It may be useful for Dems who are running in competative primaries
to subject themselves to some of these loaded interrogatives. This would be one way for them to get additonal exposure.

I don't see any Dem in a safe district sticking his/her neck out by participating in this kind of a poll. There's nothing in it for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-03-06 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. TRUE--so we can start a trend of "new" elected officials being progressive
not kleptocracy, chamber of commerce types.

That's how the far right did it to the GOP. They mostly waited for moderate & liberal republicans to die or retire, and ran hard righties in open seats. It took a couple of decades, but they transformed the party into the monolithic BORG monster it is today.

We can do the same if we demand reality be part of the discourse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-03-06 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
31. Anyone have any question TO ADD?
I'm hoping people can come up with some even better ones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-03-06 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
32. Good idea!
I'd like to see something like this endorsed by the blogosphere and the DNC....get every national and state Democrat on a database and matrix their responses.

Conversely, I'd like the Democrat Party to poll every registered Democrat, Independent, and Republican on their views of the state of our politics. Perhaps they could learn more from us directly (not having our message filtered and distorted by Republican polling techniques or biased media polls). I think our Democrats could learn more of the mood and expectations of the Party by making it a massive civic exercise to contribute our individual voices.

Frankly, it ought to be done now. It could be easily set-up on theInternet and secured by a mailed password from Party headquaters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-03-06 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. A difficulty doing this through the party: their "rope a dope" strategy
I think Howard Dean is only going along with this reluctantly, but the rest of the Democratic leadership seems to be want to hide their views until it is politically advantageous to expose them.

I'm not sure how they think that won't look like cowardice and opportunism, but for the sake of this project, it will make getting useful answers harder than pulling teeth.

Maybe we need to get the progressive-friendly candidates and elected officials to take the lead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-03-06 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
33. I think that
individual DUers should be doing surveys of their elected officials, and posting them on DU, on blogs, and reporting results in LTTE, etc.

If DU were to atempt a national survey, it might be worthwhile to have it coordinated by the powers that be, and perhaps through their activists group. Having had some experience in the area of surveys of senators and congressional representatives, including those prone to get responses, I'd suggest a 10-question format: a "yes" or "no," with room for a comment on each.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-03-06 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
35. kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 09th 2024, 05:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC