http://www.news-record.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060203/NEWSREC010201/602030320/1014/NEWSREC020201<snip>
There are distinctly different accounts of what happened on South Elm Street Tuesday night when Greensboro police confronted anti-Bush protesters. What we do know is that seven people were arrested on a variety of disturbance-related charges including inciting to riot. Several police officers received minor injuries in the ensuing melee.
A drum-banging, obscenity-shouting crowd estimated at 150 people came downtown to protest the State of the Union address. Similar demonstrations were held nationwide by World Can't Wait, an organization calling for the end of the "Bush regime.'' The timing coincided with the president's appearance before Congress.
Police say the demonstration here spilled from the sidewalk into the street, blocking traffic and causing detours. Ten officers had to be called in to augment the dozen already on hand to keep order.
The ugly encounter further deteriorated when protesters reportedly spotted a plainclothes officer videotaping licenses of cars parked on adjoining streets. A confrontation followed resulting in the injuries and arrests. Witnesses say, at some point, an officer confronted by the unruly crowd brandished a gun.
<snip>
Then there are some replies a while later:
http://blog.news-record.com/staff/letters/Videotaping suspects should come first
I find it remarkable that the police are able to videotape public gatherings but rarely videotape interviews with people suspected of committing crimes. Videotaping "confessions" should certainly be a higher priority than videotaping large public gatherings.
Coverage of anti-Bush protest lacked context
Your anti-Bush protest editorial (Feb. 6) was highly misleading. I was there the entire time, and the atmosphere, until the encounter with the undercover policeman, was anything but ugly. People were having a great time expressing their opposition to the policies of their government. It was much less rowdy than many of Chapel Hill's post-"Big Game" street parties, where several years ago a car was overturned and destroyed.
Your first article on the protest didn't even mention the arrests, leading me to believe that your reporter left before they occurred. Had he stuck around, he could have seen the situation for himself instead of relying on government press releases. We have governments, both local and national, that spy on American citizens, often for merely expressing points of view that rankle those in power. As representatives of an ostensibly free press, you should take these actions far more seriously than you do.
Many of those who marched were members of the "creative class" this city is hoping will be its economic salvation. Apparently, the message is to bring your talent and money, but leave "creative" politics at the city line.
One comment to the above letter is this:
I was there also, the police were there to make something out of nothing. But when they drove a squad car through a crowd of 150 people endangering the lives of the protestors in was obvious to me they (the Police department) was out of control. I have interviewed with internal affairs specificly about using a vehicle to intimidate a crowd and they are investigating the matter. There were mostly high school students there not the a bunch of anarchist. Let's hope the police can police themselves.
There are more letters and opinions in that area but I thought I would pass that along to you.
demgurl