Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

One more way this shoebomb story smells

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
catmandu57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 04:13 PM
Original message
One more way this shoebomb story smells
After eleven September everyone was trying to figure out how to prevent using jets in similar attacks, one of the simplest things was to install more and stronger locks on the cockpit doors.
As I recall, the airlines balked at this screaming that the costs would bankrupt them, preferring instead to arm the pilots.
My question then, is when did they reinforce the cockpit doors to keep people from kicking them in? and have they even done this yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. The last plane I flew on didn't seem to have much of a door
Edited on Thu Feb-09-06 04:19 PM by Warpy
although I did hear a lock click into place and the pilot and copilot stayed put instead of stretching their legs in the cabin (as was the norm on a long flight a few years ago).

The shoe bomb story really, really smells because people are having to remove their shoes to get through preboarding.

This gang of fearmongers and hamfisted idiots are just recycling old plots and trying to combine them in new and different ways to bamboozle the cud chewers out there in TV land into thinking they are doing something to protect us against foaming at the mouth terrorists.

I doubt it'll work really well because too many people, even those with cuds to chew, are finally recognizing that the real terror for this country is emanating from the illegal administration in Washington.

On Edit: This story is out NOW because Stupid is trying to defend his illegal wiretapping and because Stupid wants the dictatorial power bestowed by the Patriot Act renewed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catmandu57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. They do seem to be grasping at straws here
They've told so many lies that it's all going in a circle and all but the densest people know when they're being lied to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpgamerd00d Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. Shoe.... smells..... Nice one! :) -nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemInDistress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. the best way to prevent 911's is to alert the passengers of
SUICIDAL NUTS HELL BENT ON CRASHING JETS INTO BUILDINGS...but no, the crime family wanted 911..neocons needed
911..those greedy bastards got their wish, 3,000 dead and endless war for resources (OIL)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
4. Here's the thing....
I can't answer your question about the current state of the cockpit doors but...

The airlines could have prevented these attacks...they bitched and griped about how much it would cost to reinforce the doors 20 years ago.

You see one of the first US hijackings occurred in Seattle I believe 20 years ago. At that time it was an American citizen who took a gun on a plane and went into the cockpit and fought with the pilot and copilot, the copilote was killed and the hijacker was killed.

The FAA didn't make it mandatory for the Airlines to reinforce the cockpit doors. They left it to the Airlines to make the decision to take action or not. Obviously as a result we got Sept 11 because they didn't want to spend money putting a steel bar on the doors.

So my whole point is the Airlines should have never been bailed out after Sept 11. They should have been allowed to fail for making poor busines decisions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. And can you imagine how much CHEAPER it would have been to
just have given the airlines the money to redo the cockpit doors and forget about most of the other wasteful expenditures?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Exactly...my thoughts...
:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. or build better levees... or keep coal mines safe...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Silverhair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. The environmentalists sued to stop the better levees in the 1990s.
The money was there, and the Corps of Engineers had a plan to protect the entire area, and the enviros sued and got it stopped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. The same applies to air marshals. The airlines balked.
The Federal Air Marshal program dates back to the 70s. The airlines didn't want to give up a passenger seat and subsidize the program. The FAA didn't make it mandatory. It expired shortly after 9/11 and had to be resurrected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemoTex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Exactly, TN.
Just like the ValuJet crash in the Everglades. The NTSB and ALPA had been crying for cargo-compartment fire detection and suppression since an American Airlines MD-80 made an emergency landing with a fire raging in the cargo hold on 1989. It takes body count.

Now we have fire detection and suppression systems in all FAR 121 airliners. Thank the airline unions and the NTSB for that protection. Also thank the 110 killed when ValuJet Flight 592 augured into the Everglades on 5/11/96.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Yes, indeed. One of the aspects of 9/11 that angered me ..
... was how much decades-long complicity by the airline corporatists was ignored and written out of the history books. If only half of the precautions known for years and repeatedly requested by unions had been implemented, the chances of 9/11 would have been miniscule. It always takes body count ... but the "risk analysis" accessories to those homicides never have to face justice. Instead, they were rewarded with massive taxpayer-funded bailouts so they could continue their wait-for-the-bloodshed business practices.

:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemoTex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
10. All cockpit doors of aircraft flying under FAR 121 were re-inforced.
In fact, cockpit doors were re-inforced before the first pilot went through the ATF training program in Brunswick, Ga., to qualify to carry firearms.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catmandu57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. That's what I was wondering
If and when, thanks Demo Tex.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 07:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC