Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BushCo: "this information allows us to get the dots"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 04:41 PM
Original message
BushCo: "this information allows us to get the dots"
I love the smell of desperation...


http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/02/20060209-4.html

Press Briefing on the West Coast Terrorist Plot by Frances Fragos Townsend, Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism
Via Teleconference


<snip>

The case, I think more than anything, underscores the importance of real-time information sharing. And the fact is, if we don't -- by sharing the information, by working with others and sharing information real-time, while it can be a slow process -- you can see we unraveled this over a period of years, this information allows us to get the dots, as the 9/11 Commission put it. And it's only by collecting those dots and sharing them with each other, something that in isolation may not seem significant, we put together the picture that permits us to disrupt it. It is of critical importance that we build these relationships, that we foster these relationships of cooperation and trust with our allies. And, frankly, they've done nothing but get stronger since 9/11.

I also think that it's a reminder of the importance of detainee debriefings. It's only by getting this information and combining that with other sources and methods in the intelligence community that we can truly understand the intentions of our enemies and their tactics. And so we have to be careful to protect them, but that is one of the most important techniques that we have. I would also say while we have heard many criticisms of our intelligence community, this is an absolute success story of the intelligence community in general, and CIA, in particular.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. Thanx for posting this sabra
nothing quite like getting the shit straight from the bull's mouth(!) you know!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. get the dots - collect the dots - share the dots with others
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightOwwl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. I'm a dot getter...
We get dots!

(with apologies to Jon Stewart)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. um, I think that's Stephen Colbert
Edited on Thu Feb-09-06 05:01 PM by gkhouston
maybe today isn't your day to be an "it-getter"? ;-)

on edit: argh, now I'm remember's Jon's sketch with the dots. So, not my day to be an it-getter, LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ScreamingMeemie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. Not the dot getting meme again.
God, I hate using the word meme.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
5. Oh GOD, it's CONNECTING the dots, you IDIOT, not COLLECTING the dots
:banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
7. So, like, if you had a PDB titled
"Bin Laden Determined to Strike in U.S.," you think that would be a dot? Especially if the brief was dated August 6, 2001? Anything significant about that report or its title or its date that occurs to you offhand, Frances?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onethatcares Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. nowhere in it did it say,
this is a "dot", so you can see the problem with trying to collect the dots if the dots aren't there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
9. does anybody with two brain cells that arc believe that there was any
sort of real threat? how convenient.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemonGoddess Donating Member (364 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
10. gawd
they are SO full of shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC