Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

the whores are SERIOUSLY threatened by the applause Lowery got

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:06 AM
Original message
the whores are SERIOUSLY threatened by the applause Lowery got
First CNN splices out the applause, then Fox takes it a step further.

Fox not only spliced out the applause, they also go out of their way to point out the lack of applause, and they tell us that the original reports of applause were exaggerated.

No wonder they hate MediaMatters.


http://mediamatters.org/items/200602080008

CNN spliced out standing ovation greeting Lowery's WMD remarks at King funeral

Summary: During a discussion on civil rights leader Rev. Joseph Lowery's address at Coretta Scott King's funeral, CNN aired a video clip of part of Lowery's remarks, in which he mentioned the failure to find WMDs, cropping out 18 seconds of applause and the standing ovation he received without indicating that the clip had been doctored.

The February 8 edition of CNN's The Situation Room featured a video clip of part of civil rights leader Rev. Joseph Lowery's address at the February 7 funeral of civil rights activist Coretta Scott King, during which Lowery mentioned the failure to find weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Lowery's WMD remarks were greeted with 23 seconds of applause and a standing ovation. But during the CNN segment, in which host Wolf Blitzer asked his panelists -- Democratic strategist Paul Begala and former Bush administration official Victoria Clarke -- whether they thought Lowery's remarks were appropriate, CNN played the clip of Lowery, but cropped 18 seconds of applause -- more than three fourths of the time -- and footage of the standing ovation, without any indication that the clip had been doctored. Viewers who were watching Lowery's remarks for the first time would not have known that they actually drew a standing ovation -- not the perfunctory five seconds of applause CNN's edited clip conveyed -- and that the 23 seconds of applause prevented Lowery from continuing his eulogy.






http://mediamatters.org/items/200602090006


After the clip aired, Kondracke stated:


The February 8 edition of Fox News' Special Report with Brit Hume featured an edited video clip of civil rights leader Rev. Joseph Lowery's address at the February 7 funeral of civil rights activist Coretta Scott King, during which Lowery mentioned the failure to find weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. While Lowery's remarks were greeted with 23 seconds of applause and a standing ovation, the clip Fox News aired presented nine seconds of applause and little hint of the standing ovation -- and no indication that the clip had been doctored. The clip was aired during a segment in which guest host Chris Wallace asked his "Fox All-Star" panel to comment on Lowery's remarks. Fox's editing of the clip apparently had some effect on Wallace's own guest, Roll Call executive editor Morton M. Kondracke, who while apparently having formed one impression based on what he had heard about the crowd's response to the remarks, concluded from the curtailed video that "it wasn't exactly uproarious in its response."

KONDRACKE: What was interesting to me was, when I saw it -- and on this tape, the crowd did not go as wild as you -- as it sounded as though it did at the time and as various people have represented. I mean, I thought that the crowd basically treated President Bush very respectfully, and it wasn't exactly uproarious in its response to either Lowery or to President Carter. So I thought it -- on the whole -- it was a -- it was quite a dramatic and sensitive tribute to Mrs. King.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
qanda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. They can't handle the truth
The majority of blacks cannot stand Bush and are not afraid to say so. Even the black Republicans in my family don't like Bush or the direction of the country.

They're not bothered by it being political, no one even mentioned Bush's name, they're bothered that Bush had to sit there and hear the truth. They're bothered that Americans, who are asleep and thinking that we need electronic survellience, might actually wake up and realize that the government has used these same tactics in the past against good people.

They keep putting all these black Republicans on their stations to make it seem like blacks don't like the Democrats anymore and they don't want to show the truth about the black population-- we don't like Bush, we don't like Republicans and we don't care what white America thinks about how we conduct our funerals. So they need to get over it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:15 AM
Response to Original message
2. Kondracke is smoking something
They treated W with politeness. They loved Carter, Lowery, and especially Clinton.

The Bushbots are having a hard time meeting reality.

Roll Call needs to can the neocons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. you must have heard wrong
please listen only to the approved Fox remixes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:16 AM
Response to Original message
3. Kondracke sold his soul to be a two-bit lackey for Shit Spume?
The Devil ripped you off, Mort.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ron Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:16 AM
Response to Original message
4. These guys, Kondrake and Barnes,
are just about the most blatant of the right wing's pandering, sold-out, bought-and-paid-for slutty prosititutes that ever show up on the teevee. They are deserving of all the scorn and derision that can be mustered by any and all of us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:36 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. They are 2 ex journalists
that aren't considered journalists any more. They are right wingers bushbots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Willmc_Productions Donating Member (1 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 01:45 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Now Now
Ok..
I like CNN. It did play the clip but I must admit it did a bad
job on the edit. BUT. The right has been calling CNN The
Clinton New Network for Years. 
The also played President Carter's remarks as well. 23 seconds
of clapping really does not change too much.
I did see that Fox played the entire clip. But also ran a
piece about politics at a funeral.
My only problem with all three networks is that they have
seemed to sell their soul to have reporters
"embedded" with the troops. Let's see how much that
happens if they go against the grain a bit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Hi Willmc_Productions!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lars39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. CNN has stated that they want to be more like Fox News.
Fox News, btw, admitted that they had government censors in their newsroom. Nice of them to be an arm of the bush administration, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #7
14. The RW has been whining for years about a Libberul Media too
despite the fact that any objective content analysis always shows an extreme rightward bias. In fact, CNN is only slightly less egregious than Fox, and they're quickly closing the gap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Exit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #4
12. They are also the biggest losers on cable TV
They can't garner an audience. They are not even has-beens. They are never-was's.

So one is left to wonder why on earth they are still sitting in those seats at Fox News. The answer is: Wingnut Welfare (Media Division).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 01:55 AM
Response to Original message
8. Olbermann had this, too. In his "Worst Person in the World' segment.
Pox "news" got the bronze AND the gold this time. One of those being this story with that pathetic asswipe kondracke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #8
15. And he spelled it FAUX *g* I love Keith!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
f-bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 02:02 AM
Response to Original message
9. what a bunch of bullshit
thank God people are calling the media whores on their manipulative crap!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
13. Dean scream deja vu!
Manipulating the media is SOP for these guys.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kma3346 Donating Member (423 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
16. 1984: We are there!!!
This is beyond disgusting. Thank God for the Internet and blogs--otherwise, we'd all be in the dark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC