Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Poetic justice: Options on Lay and Skilling doing time

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
DLnyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 06:34 PM
Original message
Poetic justice: Options on Lay and Skilling doing time
The irony of this cracks me up:

http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/060210/enron_trial_betting.html?.v=2

Long before Enron Corp. drowned in scandal, its former chiefs Kenneth Lay and Jeffrey Skilling trumpeted the company's savvy in creating trading markets beyond energy. Now it turns out they are the subjects of futures contracts that allow investors to wager on whether they will be convicted of fraud and conspiracy charges.

(snip)

Lawyers for the two men criticized such speculation on the future of their clients, who would face decades in prison if convicted. "I think it's abhorrent, betting on people's lives," Skilling lawyer Daniel Petrocelli said. Added Michael Ramsey, Lay's lawyer: "It should probably be illegal. That's an invitation to tamper with the case."

. . .

(of course, I suppose those same lawyers would argue that betting on the energy supply to the state of California is not betting on people's lives and, of course, out of control energy options trading was not an invitation to tamper with the energy market and there's no reason it should be illegal to gamble (and lose) the life savings of thousands of Enron employees and . . .)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NanceGreggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh, no, he didn't say that!
Added Michael Ramsey, Lay's lawyer: "It should probably be illegal."

ILLEGAL? Like what your client did was ILLEGAL? Did you mean that kind of ILLEGAL?

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
panader0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. I heard on the news this morning that one of their lawyers
had too much cologne on and one of the jury asked the judge to make him remove it because she was going to throw up. Just listening to the testimony would do that for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC