Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

South Dakota ready to ban abortion...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 07:51 PM
Original message
South Dakota ready to ban abortion...
PIERRE, S.D. (AP) -- One brave legislator who voted against freight-train legislation that would ban nearly all abortions in South Dakota said what others were undoubtedly thinking: Vote no and risk political wrath at the polls.

Rep. Burt Elliott, a Democrat from Aberdeen, uttered the remark Thursday during tense debate of the legislation, which passed the House 47-22, unscathed by several attempts to temper the measure.

"How you vote on this is going to be used in campaign fodder against you," Elliott remarked, drawing a rebuke from Rep. Larry Rhoden, a Union Center Republican rancher who leads the House GOP.

"I'm offended that anybody on this floor would accuse us of being political on this issue," Rhoden said. "We're debating this based on our own personal beliefs."

Elliott, a teacher, said he opposes abortion but could not vote for HB1215 because the House refused to provide an exemption for victims of rape and incest.

http://www.siouxcityjournal.com/articles/2006/02/10/news/latest_news/d375a5f99c8cba1786257111004d7606.txt

How long until this hits the SCOTUS?

I read not long ago thousands of women have died from unsafe abortions around the world due to the policies of the bush administration. Africa has been especially hard hit.

:cry:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CatholicEdHead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. A matter of months?
This was planned to hit the Supreme Court and have the court re-rule on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. this onslaught (er) begin the day after Alito was sworn in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whathappened Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. what about the part
we are debateing this on our own personal veiws , i thought these people we working for we the people
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
4. Bush deserves blame for a lot of things
illegal abortions in Africa isn't one of them. Africa hasn't changed its abortion policy since Bush has been in office and even under Clinton we didn't fund legal abortions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. but didn't the US fund clinics...
that advised and helped women get access to safe abortions, plus provide birth control and educate them?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. I don't think we funded them under Clinton either
thanks to Chris Smith of New Jersey.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
5. I that any law like this will be stayed - almost immediately.
Edited on Fri Feb-10-06 07:56 PM by Maat
Currently, it would be unconstitutional to apply it.

It would first be challenged in a lower court; it would have to go up through the state's court's first, I believe.

It IS, however, what is called a trigger law, and would take effect if "Roe v. Wade" were ever overturned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
6. I can't stand it!
Don't like abortion? DON'T HAVE ONE! Geez!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politicat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
8. This is SO stupid: SD doesn't even HAVE a permanent abortion provider.
Edited on Fri Feb-10-06 08:08 PM by politicat
Women from SD who need abortions will do the same thing they've been doing: come to Colorado or go to Wichita, Kansas to get their abortions. And we in Colorado will continue to host them and make their stays as comfortable and easy as possible. (There is a single clinic in Sioux Falls that does abortions, but the providers are from out of state, and for anyone on the Western side of the state, Boulder, Colorado is closer.)

This is such a grandstanding, politically motivated bill it's not even funny. South Dakota representatives need to stand up to the idiot who proposed this and their constituents who would try to hang them over this. It doesn't affect anything.

And what's triply idiotic... there are forced-birthers in South Dakota who are convinced that hundreds of thousands of baaaaaybies are aborted hourly by women who got pregnant intentionally to either kill it ten minutes before it would have been born, or to sue the bewildered, non-condom-wearing Good, All-Suffering Father (TM) for millions in child support. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BushOut06 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. It's an empty gesture. But it will encourage other states to follow suit
It was pretty easy for SD to do this, they don't really have to worry about abortions anyways. But this will make it easier for other states to follow suit. "Look, South Dakota did it, why don't we try it?" will be the question asked in state legislatures around the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
9. every woman in SD should pack up and leave and
Edited on Fri Feb-10-06 08:11 PM by Mend
take their daughters with them. The men can screw their sheep...they won't get pregnant. Voila, no abortions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Katherine Brengle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
10. 40 years of work and legislation down the toilet... i hope people are
ready to fight again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC