Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

C-Span (Pedro) Washington Journal At It Again

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-03-06 07:51 AM
Original message
C-Span (Pedro) Washington Journal At It Again
Guests include Newt, a CATO Institute person, American Enterprise Instit. person,
AND 2 Dem callers had "connection problems," and they did not go back to a Dem caller with a "good connection"
."
Instead 3 repuke callers in a row, with one predicting one party rule.

http://www.c-span.org/homepage.asp?Cat=Series&Code=WJE&ShowVidNum=9&Rot_Cat_CD=WJ&Rot_HT=206&Rot_WD=&ShowVidDays=100&ShowVidDesc=&ArchiveDays=30


http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=2780




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NI4NI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-03-06 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks for the warning!
I'll pass.
It's way too early to get pist off or to listen to that gobbly a gook goony Newt Gingrich
On second thought, maybe I'll call in on the Repugnican line and ask him if he's current with his alimony and child support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-03-06 08:06 AM
Response to Original message
2. Isn't it time we changed the name to C-Scam?
After the ANSWER rally fiasco, I don't view C-Scam as anything but yet another extension of the GOP's propaganda arm. I keep waiting for "Sponsored by Lincoln Group" messages on the screen. I can't watch that crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-03-06 08:12 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. I'm with you!
At one time I was a religious C-span WJ devotee, but no longer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-03-06 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
3. Did you like the guy predicting war?
That we'd invade Iran and that there'd be another attack within the US and "then the Democrats will lose big time."

What the hell does that mean?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-03-06 08:15 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. And don't forget, that America will become a one party state
after the next election. Where has he been?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-03-06 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. The US will be "attacked" again the day after the Pubs lose Congress
Count on it. I think London oddsmakers wouldn't even give you even money on that bet. Dick Cheney has it all planned out; he's been saving the attack plans he created in case Kerry got elected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-03-06 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. no, the day BEFORE the elections
Edited on Tue Jan-03-06 12:01 PM by librechik
so when they steal it they can say "oh, must have been that teror attack that turned the polls around" again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-03-06 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
5. I still think they are pretty fair. Dem. also sometimes take over
I think they plan bad at times so it either seems like a GOP show or Dem. show. It maybe that people will only come on if it is set up like that. I loved the GOP guys that kept calling the libertarians Dem. the other day.I guess they got mixed with the start of the word. Did I spell that right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-03-06 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. we already have one party rule (and we did it to ourselves).

...Instead 3 repuke callers in a row, with one predicting one party rule.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-03-06 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. I heard that guy. Now that is killing him self off for sure.
Hate to tell him that Russia had one party rule for about 60 years. I some times think that we should put a fence around people that think that way as it is un-am.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-03-06 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
8. What was that little move Pedro just did with the caller
who was trying to call the Cato Institute guy on the idea that the middle class is getting better in the US and moving up to the upper class?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-03-06 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
9. C-span loves the AEI
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-03-06 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
13. That guy who called and predicted we'd" have another terrorist attack
and that would finish the Democratic Party and this country will have a ONE PARTY RULE".....WAS HAPPY ABOUT THAT!!!! Does he know what "one party rule means?" Fucking wacko nut job IDIOT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC