Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

neo-cons occupy Village Voice - shock and awe

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 01:24 PM
Original message
neo-cons occupy Village Voice - shock and awe

http://www.sfbg.com/40/19/news_merger.html

Merger mania

Lacey to Voice staff: Drop dead

--

The merger between the nation's two largest alternative newspaper chains was finally consummated Jan. 31, and the very next day, Mike Lacey, the new owner of the Village Voice, was in New York City giving the staff the facts of life.

Lacey met with Voice staffers Feb. 1, and, according to sources who were present at the meeting, announced that the Voice news section was too soft because it was full of commentary and criticism of the Bush administration. He said he didn't want any more commentary — just hard news and long-form human-interest stories.

He also insulted the entire news department by saying Voice reporters "need to stop being stenographers" and, the sources told the Guardian, warned the staff "to be ready to say goodbye to some of your friends."

When one participant said the description of the staff as "stenographers" was unfair, Lacey reportedly responded, "So, I'm unfair."

The Voice carried no news on the closure of the deal, which combines New Times Media and Village Voice Media. Scott Spear, senior vice president of the new company, announced the consummation of the merger in a terse release stating that the big chain will take the Village Voice Media name and publish alternative weeklies in 17 markets.
-snip-

PS Full disclosure: The Guardian is suing New Times (now VVM), the East Bay Express and SF Weekly, alleging that the chain is using predatory pricing to try to put an independent competitor out of business.
----------------------------------


so now we have another funeral to attend to

Village Voice, it was good to know you

if the media can sue each other, why can't we the people sue the media for withholding info and lying?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JeffR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. RIP
Sad.
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. How the HELL did this happen?
:wtf:?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. It's been going on for years. Your local alt-weekly has been lying to you
About being "independent" for over a decade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. Probably a good move-spend (throw away) some r/w money
Question: who used to read the Voice? Answer: progressives and "liberal subversives"
Question: who will now read the Voice? Answer: nobody.

Good move
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
okieinpain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. a silent coup..... when they close the voice it will because reader
ship was down......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. Just anotehr example of why we should not keep ignoring mergermania
The consolidation of the economy into monopolistic concentrations is dealing a death blow to the United States on many levels.

And yet, we continue to ignore it as an issue.

Democrats shild have started challenging this trend years ago by restoring the use of anti-trust regulation. But there is no excuse to keep ignoring it now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
5. Well, maybe some youngsters will get off their asses and start a brand new
'underground' paper. The VV certainly were playing the corporate game with their executive salaries, at any rate. And the deal may get rescinded, though I would not hold my breath:

The US Justice Department signed off early on the deal, even though the two chains were caught in 2002 in an illegal market-allocation agreement (see "New Times Nailed," 1/29/03).

California attorney general Bill Lockyer is still investigating whether the merger could violate the consent decree the two companies signed to settle the 2002 antitrust charges and whether it will lessen competition in the state. A decision is expected shortly.

Meanwhile, documents obtained by us from a source close to the Village Voice show the New Times managers will inherit a company that, despite its progressive politics, has profound salary differentials between the executive and staff levels. While most staff writers earned between $40,000 and $50,000 in 2005, the records show, editor in chief Dan Forst, who recently left his job, was paid $324,567. While some classified sales reps and receptionists made less than $30,000, the outgoing publisher, Judy Miszner, made $238,702.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politicat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. Compared to Insurance, Manufacturing?? That's a great differential!
That's only a 10x differential between average worker and Executive management.

Compared to the insurance industry, financial services, etc, where execs regularly make 300 and 500 times what their lowest paid employees make, the VV was a model of equality. Don't let New Times spin this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Well, they weren't doing the spinning--and even if they were, it doesn't
matter anymore. The VV will be like New Coke, unless they do some serious investigative reporting. And I wouldn't count on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. I must agree. A factor of 10 times for executive is not extreme.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Loge23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
6. ...another management guru?
Sounds like Mr. Lacey attended the Genghis Khan School of Management.
Always a sound tactic to get staff "buy-in" to any radical changes ASAP. Mr. Lacey's off to a great start. Antagonize, threaten, insult, and then...crash and burn.
All readers of the Voice should know about this jerk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SmokingJacket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
8. Damn! That's tragic!
It was an excellent paper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
9. What, pray tell is an "alternative newspaper chain"
And why should I care when two of them merge?

Both chains have sucked for years. Guardians of the upper-class white
intelligentsia and gentrification in the name of "progressive urban
politics". And total, absolute hypocrites on all sorts of levels.
"Alternative", my ***. They are like the bodies of dead soldiers
occupied by Aliens in the movie of the same name. And they died back
in the 80's. That goes double for the Village Voice, the official
newspaper of Limousine Leninists.

The City Paper chain (I think owned by New Times) is even worse. At least mainstream newspapers look different from city to city! What kind of country is it where the "alternative" media is more homogeneous -- and more right wing, in a snarky, socially progressive, neoliberal sort of way -- than the MSM?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bushy Being Born Donating Member (267 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
11. If they kick Ward Sutton, I'm gonna throw a fit!
I'm sure I'm not alone here in finding his 'Sutton Impact' cartoons hilarious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemGirl7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. You're not alone...I love Ward Sutton's cartoons
His "Sutton Impact" cartoons get right to the point, and are so true at the same time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
12. another alternative media voice silenced . . . RIP . . . n/t
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
13. God, I'm sick of the neocons not being able to take an ounce of criticism
I mean shit, they call US the crybabies! :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PhilipShore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
18. The News That's Not News
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
19. "First we take Manhattan - then we take the World" Leonard Cohen
Actually - it is Berlin that they take second in the song.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC