Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Italian Study Spells Trouble for Aspartame (NutraSweet) - NYT, 2/12/06

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
SOS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 01:44 PM
Original message
Italian Study Spells Trouble for Aspartame (NutraSweet) - NYT, 2/12/06
Edited on Sun Feb-12-06 02:21 PM by SOS
February 12, 2006
The Lowdown on Sweet?
By MELANIE WARNER

WHEN Dr. Morando Soffritti, a cancer researcher in Bologna, Italy, saw the results of his team's seven-year study on aspartame, he knew he was about to be injected into a bitter controversy over this sweetener, one of the most contentiously debated substances ever added to foods and beverages.

The research found that the sweetener was associated with unusually high rates of lymphomas, leukemias and other cancers in rats that had been given doses of it starting at what would be equivalent to four to five 20-ounce bottles of diet soda a day for a 150-pound person...The findings, first released last July, prompted a flurry of criticism from the Calorie Control Council, a trade group for makers of artificial sweeteners that has spent the last 25 years trying to quell fears about aspartame.

In the United States, the Food and Drug Administration says it has also taken note of the study, which is available online (http://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/docs/2005/8711/abstract.html) and is scheduled to be published next month in a medical journal financed by the National Institutes of Health. F.D.A. officials say that they, too, intend to conduct a thorough review.

Documents from the F.D.A. and records from the Federal Register indicate that, in the years before the F.D.A. approved aspartame, the agency had serious concerns about the accuracy and credibility of Searle's aspartame studies. From 1977 to 1985 — during much of the approval process — Searle was headed by Donald H. Rumsfeld, who is now the secretary of defense; Searle was acquired by Monsanto in 1985. A 1976 report from an F.D.A. task force, for example, found that Searle's studies on aspartame were "poorly conceived, carelessly executed, or inaccurately analyzed or reported." In response to the report, the F.D.A. asked the Justice Department to open a grand jury investigation into whether two of Searle's aspartame studies had been falsified or were incomplete. A grand jury was never convened, however."

Much more on Searle, Rumsfeld, the FDA and the industry-funded "studies" conducted over the years:

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/12/business/yourmoney/12sweet.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NVMojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. aw, poor Rummy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ellen Forradalom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. Good thing I never got in the diet pop habit
in those years because that stuff gives me horrible headaches.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinnie From Indy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Wow! That always happens to me as well.
I have always stayed away from "diet" drinks of all kinds because I couldn't handle the artificial sweetners. I also thought the taste was horrible as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. I've been begging my mom to give it up for years
I think it's responsible for strokes and her on-setting senility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qanda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. Why people continue to drink this poison is beyond me
My sisters have all types of health concerns and I have begged them to cut out the excessive use of diet sodas. For some reason they just won't listen to me. I can't come anywhere near the stuff because I get an instant headache, but I guess if it doesn't kill you instantly people don't mind being poisoned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Buy this book for them.... it will be over by the time they get through
the index....

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0929173252/sr=8-1/qid=1139771495/ref=pd_bbs_1/104-3980654-6603155?%5Fencoding=UTF8
http://images.amazon.com/images/P/0929173252.01._BO2,204,203,200_PIsitb-dp-500-arrow,TopRight,45,-64_AA240_SH20_SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg

It is almost a cliche in this day and age for someone to ask the waiter at a Chinese restaurant 'no MSG, please,' as is the waiter's knowing smirk in response. MonoSodium Glutamate (MSG), or 'The essence of taste' (as coined by the Japanese), is used as a 'taste-enhancer' in nearly every form of processed food on the market today, though 'taste addiction' may be a more correct term. But what exactly does it do? And how is it harmful?

Dr. Russell L. Blaylock answers these questions and poses some startling evidence as to the eventual consequences of a heavy MSG-diet in his book _Excitotoxins: The Taste that Kills_. In basic terms, MSG (and other, similar agents) pierces the blood-brain barrier and over-stimulates the neurons of a brain to a deadly degree. Habitual intake among animal experiments has shown the development of tumors, memory loss, and a whole host of neurodegenerative diseases as the end result of excess excitotoxin intake, including Alzhiemer's, Parkenson's, Lou Gerhig's etc.

Walk into any gas station in the United States (or grocery store, for that matter) and, upon close investigation, you will find that 75%-90% of the available food has been 'enhanced' to some degree by excitotoxins. The chemical agents are often disguised by such ambiguous terms as 'spice' and 'natural flavors' or, my personal favorite, 'hydrolyzed vegetable protein.' A consumer society must have consumer slaves to keep it functioning; MSG is the crack cocaine of the food industry...and it is legally perpetuated by slush-fund advocates and a pork-glutted FDA. As proven again and again, money talks, ... .

Blaylock's thesis is written in a technical style, but the use of repetition throughout each chapter hammer in his myriad points into the reader with precision and power. An important book for anyone concerned with the health of self and family. You are what you eat---but do you know _what_ it is you are eating, below the surface of taste/fulfillment?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecoalex Donating Member (718 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. More studies, what does it take? he FDA protects killers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. It's not just FDA and coporate scientists. It's Organized Science in
Edited on Sun Feb-12-06 02:46 PM by cryingshame
general. And then you have the Psuedo-Skeptics who will look at your holistic medicine link and call anything therein "Quackery".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qanda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Thank you
Edited on Sun Feb-12-06 02:47 PM by qanda
On Edit: I just ordered this for my sister.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. You are most welcome.... and if you want to help heal her....
www.lef.org
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. It's addictive
People I know who drink a six pack of diet soda every day just can't quit. I know someone who tried to quit cold turkey and suffered nasty withdrawal symptoms. It's bad stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
7. Will the PseudoSkeptics attack THIS? After all, the FDA and corporate
and organized Science community all say the studies condemning Aspartamine are bunk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
11. I don't know that there's ever been a question of aspartame's downside.
ALl the arguments I've ever heard is that the (assumed) "upside" (reduced deaths due to obesity and associated maladies) presented a positive trade-off. I'm not at all convinced, however, that artificial sweeteners have EVER accomplished any reduction in the incidence of obesity and am aware of no studies that would indicate they have. "I'll take a Big Mac and a Diet Coke, please!" If anything, diet soft drinks enable the continued addictions to fatty/sweet foods, an addiction that can only be offset with habituation to different/healthier tastes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bedazzled Donating Member (584 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
13. has anybody noticed they're putting aspartame in regular sugared gum?
like doublemint or juicy fruit? my husband just noticed it the other day.

i wouldn't touch the stuff with a barge pole. searle was testing oral contraceptives at the same time, and the FDA caught them cutting tumors out of the test rats and falsifying information regarding rat deaths. this was back when the FDA was actually worth something...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC