Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is It Me, or is Something Disturbingly Wack About PBS Lately...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Robert Murphy Donating Member (305 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-03-06 01:49 PM
Original message
Is It Me, or is Something Disturbingly Wack About PBS Lately...
Ok, I'm embarrassed to say I haven't been following the stunts the Bushies recently were trying pull with PBS as closely as I should have; I just know the basics of what the likes of Bill Moyers et al. were contending, and that what is on record supports said contentions.

Last night I tune into the local PBS affiliate here in Seattle. First time I've watched any TV in ages; the set is on loan from a friend who is in between apartments. "American Experience" is on. It's all about Reagan and his presidency. I'm expecting something sorta Frontline-esque; i.e., I don't expect the show to meet the same high standard Frontline so consistently achieves, but I figure the ratio of conservatives praising Reagan and liberals criticizing him will be more or less even.

NOT!

Good God, I was astonished by what I saw. There wasn't even a 'ratio.' What was supposed to pass for 'balance' amounted to what was an utterly inane, feeble, and calculated effort to pass off two hours of near-hagiography as a legitimate documentary. It went like this: the likes of George F. Will, Thatcher, Weingberger, et al. praising Reagan to the skies, sometimes followed by some (usually no-name) 'liberal' allowed a feebly dissenting sentence or two ripped out of context, and presented in such a fashion as to make said 'liberal' sound pissy and pedantic. (And wrong.) (There are exceptions. E.g., Chris Matthews, that notoriously fierce critic of Reagan, is allowed much more than two sentences, oddly enough. Among his most damning criticisms is Matthew's scathing accusation that Reagan was truly one with the American working-class Everyman...) I was left with the inescapable impression of a political infomercial masquerading as documentary. No, really, this thing had the feel of a video version of the Washington Times.

Then...

A promo for another 'documentary.' Evidently a biblical travelogue; the premise is some guy heads to the Levant for some Christian sight-seeing. The title is 'Walking the Bible' or something like that. This wouldn't have left any sort of impression on me had it not also included the bombastic line "Following in the footsteps of the greatest story ever told," and come right after 'The Story of St. Reagan.'

WTF? Seems like the Bushies efforts are paying off...

Robert
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FDR33 Donating Member (44 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-03-06 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. I don't think it was a new program
I didn't find it too one-sided, I thought it was pretty fair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K8-EEE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-03-06 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. I Stopped Giving To PBS -- SIck Of Crap Like This
They still haven't recovered from that heckova job idiot that BushCo installed in there, who ended up resigning in disgrace of course...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blutodog Donating Member (291 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-03-06 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. Totalitarian state
We are now living in a Totalitarian state. Why are u surprised that State TV is acting the part? NPR has also taken on a much more rightist hue of late.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peekaloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-03-06 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. ironic given that the special championed Reagan's "efforts" to
end totalitarian states.

:eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-03-06 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
4. It's been going to the right for some time now.
The management has effectively gotten rid of or marginalized the lefties. Sometimes I feel like I'm watching Fox. There still aren't any actressy anchors yet, but I'm sure they're coming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-03-06 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
5. "Cheryl Halpern Named Head Of Corporation for Public Broadcasting"



Washington Report, December 2005

Media Watch

Israel-Firster Cheryl Halpern Named Head Of Corporation for Public Broadcasting

By Richard H. Curtiss


CPB head Cheryl F. Halpern (www.cpb.org).

CHERYL F. Halpern, a major Republican fundraiser, has been elected the new chairwoman of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB). The private, nonprofit corporation, created by Congress in 1967, describes itself as “the largest single source of funding for public television and radio programming.”

Halpern has served on the CPB board since 2002, and has criticized National Public Radio’s Middle East coverage, calling it biased against Israel. She has overseen such U.S. government-funded media projects as Voice of America, Radio Marti in Cuba and Radio Free Iraq. Formerly chairwoman for the Republican Jewish Coalition, Halpern currently sits on the board of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, a spinoff of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, Israel’s Washington, DC lobby. In 2001 she used her own personal funds to commission a review of anti-Semitism in Syrian textbooks.

Halpern was a delegate from the Coordinating Board of Jewish Organizations to the 4th United Nations World Conference on Women’s Rights in 1995 in Beijing, and from 1998 to 2002 chaired the United Nations Advisory Council of B’nai B’rith International. Halpern’s selection as CPB chair, warned the citizens’ group Common Cause, may “mean more politicizing for public broadcasting.”

Perhaps not surprisingly, Halpern’s family has business interests in Israel. She is married to Fredrick Michael Halpern, a real estate developer born in Bayreuth, Bavaria, who is a member of the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith as well as of AIPAC. The couple has three children.

In her new role Halpern will oversee distribution of the $400 million in funds for public radio and television stations that CPB receives from Congress. In mid-October, conservative House Republicans proposed that taxpayer support for CPB be eliminated as part of a cost-cutting effort to pay for repairing the damage from Hurricane Katrina. Indeed, for many years some Republicans have sought to permanently eliminate CPB’s public funding....

http://www.wrmea.com/archives/December_2005/0512027.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SmokingJacket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-03-06 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. Yep. Bought and sold.
It's enough to make a person weep. You can thank the hard work of Kenneth Tomlinson, who's gone now, but wreaked plenty of damage. See here: http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Kenneth_Tomlinson

They didn't want to be the party that "killed Big Bird," so they instead of getting rid of PBS, they made it "balanced." Balanced my ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowdogmi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-03-06 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
8. It caused me to have nightmares
and not the normal reoccuring one about umpa lumpa's. I think that any fair and balanced documentary should have blamed Ronnie for our current mess. Ie. Funding the afgan's that evolved into al q.
Additionally as I watched in abject horror they talked about the end of the cold war and how we out spent the soviet union til they reached economic collapse I couldn't help but think of an old adage I heard somewhere about "The enemy you know is better than the one you don't" I am no sympathizer of communist but with two super powers we had less area to police/defend. I believe their influence helped keep the lid on the spread of islamic fascism. Still it was more ronnie cheering than I could stand. I am sure Grover was behind it. I hope there is a special circle in Hell reserved for men like him.
:puke:
:hurts:
:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-03-06 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
9. They are doing the complete take over :( nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flordehinojos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-03-06 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
10. ronal reagan?
:puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC