Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

To run for the Senate, one needs a lot of money, organization, and...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 12:58 AM
Original message
To run for the Senate, one needs a lot of money, organization, and...
the Party structure behind him/her. It is much more difficult to win a Senate seat than a House seat. Most Senators are established politicians.

There is no rule that says you must be in the House before you are in the Senate. However, it is easier to win by going that route. One should not look at a run for Congress as a lesser job. The Party is looking for men with experience and a proven track record.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mythsaje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 01:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. Career politicians with close ties to the lobbyists in Washington?
Yep, that's EXACTLY what we need.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ISUGRADIA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 01:06 AM
Response to Original message
2. "The Party is looking for men"
I think they are looking for women too....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikehiggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 01:07 AM
Response to Original message
3. And no need for any of those pesky primaries, right? Just let the guys
at the top decide who will run for what job. They've been doing such a great job of it, right?

WAKE UP!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mslawstudent Donating Member (119 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 01:07 AM
Response to Original message
4. I was thinking of running for congress.
Its the 1st district of MS, so its a guaranteed loss. But I think getting candidates out there is important. Letting Republicans run unopposed looks bad. Sometimes Wicker is opposed by a nursing home aide who shows up to one event. I am a licensed attorney so at least I'd look semi-serious and I can speak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikehiggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 01:11 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. There are no "guaranteed" losses, just probabilities.
The problem we face is that the "leadership" wants to concentrate on the races the pollsters say are doable, when we really should be running hard against every GOPuke, everywhere (and some dinos as well).

What do you have to lose?

And how long do you think we have if things continue the way they are?

The GOPukes are fighting a new civil war and we ain't winning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mb7588a Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 01:22 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. anybody is beatable...
but it takes a special kind of candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nashyra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 01:27 AM
Response to Reply #4
12. Go for it
Don't let a race go unopposed if you are qualified.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pstans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 01:08 AM
Response to Original message
5. The party doesn't elect the Senators
The people elect their leaders to go to the Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 01:10 AM
Response to Original message
6. JFK went from House to Senate
to POTUS. Hackett should try the House again (all available funding by the Dems) with the promise that he is their man for future Senate runs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikehiggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 01:12 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. And what is that promise worth, exactly? And do you really want to
compare JFK or RFK or Teddy to Paul Hackett? I'm not sure but I don't think Paul's dad was Ambassador to the Court of St. James, or any of that stuff, know what I mean?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 01:20 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. but he could probably beat the crap out of Mean Jean this time
EOM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ISUGRADIA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-14-06 01:22 AM
Response to Original message
10. "easier to win by going that route"
I think I counted 5 Democrats that were elected directly from the House to the Senate in the last 10 years so it may not be as common anymore for Democrats as you think. We've had much better success with candidates from other offices and non politicians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC