On "Private Property" one doesn't need to wear approved "Hunting Gear."

[KoKo]

I have relatives who own alot of property off Hilton Head Island in SC and their kids and their friends are allowed to drive ATV's to the MAX SPEED without any head gear or body defending clothing...just because it's PRIVATE PROPERTY and they as REPUGS are against "Head Gear Protection" for motorcyclists and think that raising ATR DRIVERS on "Hazard Course" with out proper gear for "Their Kids" and "Friends of their Kids" is what they Love About AMERICA...AND BUSH... Because...Bush hates RESTRICTIONS on America's FREEDOMS...as much as they do?

So..My Georgia realtives who are "Bush Pioneers" think that their PRIVATE RANCHES allow anyone to do what they want to ...to thwart what "They" consider "RESTRICTIVE DEM LAWS" on their "Own Personal Behavior."

In conclusion...I think the Armstrong Ranch allowed Cheney et al ..to shoot whatever they wanted to WITHOUT WEARING PROPER HUNTING GEAR!

And the CHENEY COVERUP is about that NONE of them ...wore ...Proper Hunting Gear because they were on "PRIVATE BUSCH CO RANCH?"

:shrug:

[Jacobin]

1. Actually, from the Wildlife and Fisheries report yesterday

the victim was wearing a blaze orange hat AND coat......

[FreedomAngel82]

2. Perhaps

And that's just silly anyways. You should always protect yourself. But wasn't it really cold this weekend in Texas and they wore a lot of clothing? Would the bullets still go through all of their clothes?

[rwheeler31]

3. I am sorry you were exposed to this

above the law, hate the public good crowd. Money makes some people crazy.