FreedomAngel82
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-15-06 12:03 AM
Original message |
If Hackett in Ohio has the support why doesn't he stay in? |
|
A caller on Malloy's show (the one who called in about Waxmen) said how in all the polls showed Hackett clearly a head of everyone including Brown. If that's true why didn't he stay in and tell Reid and Schumer "hell no"? If money was such a concern why couldn't he have asked the regular folks like people here on DU and the blogs or the DNC? Do you think the money is the real reason or was there something else going on?
|
WCGreen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-15-06 12:04 AM
Response to Original message |
1. To be honest with you.... |
|
I think he was looking for an out...
|
JI7
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-15-06 12:04 AM
Response to Original message |
2. because he probably can't win the Democratic Primary |
|
since primary voters are mostly liberal leaning which benefits Brown.
|
FreedomAngel82
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-15-06 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. But according to this caller from Ohio |
|
he was beating Brown in the polls. So wouldn't he win the primaries? :shrug:
|
Old and In the Way
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-15-06 12:10 AM
Response to Original message |
4. Do you think Republicans would like to stir the pot in the Democratic |
|
primaries? Divide the Democrats and get us divided going into the GE? I do.
|
FreedomAngel82
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-15-06 12:11 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. Malloy just read an Email from someone |
|
and saying how some republicans might've done this desguised as democrats. I think I do remember reading here at DU there were some democrats in Ohio who weren't really democrats. Maybe it was them? But why would they want to back a liberal like Brown over Hackett who's new to politics?
|
rucky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-15-06 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
10. When I registered in OH, they never asked my party affil. |
|
so I suppose the primaries are open, and seeing as DeWine's unchallenged on his side, every Republican with some time on his hands could vote. And if they're thinking strategically, they'd vote Brown into the position, because they know Hackett is a bigger threat.
Here in Southern OH, Brown's a virtual unknown, but will carry the reputation as a "liberal from the North". He'll never carry my county, or the ones next to mine, but I can see Hackett having a fighting chance against DeWine. Hackett's plain talk and veteran background plays much better here.
|
Kukesa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-15-06 01:15 AM
Response to Reply #10 |
12. Yep, DeWine will be elected again. nt |
FreedomAngel82
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-15-06 01:20 AM
Response to Reply #10 |
13. It's all just strange |
|
Oh and they did that here too with registration. They don't ask you your political affiliation which I think is much safer after what happened in 2004 with democratic registration forums.
|
ticapnews
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-15-06 12:21 AM
Response to Original message |
6. The party establishment would have been against him |
|
Edited on Wed Feb-15-06 12:25 AM by ticapnews
I know how much contempt people here have for the party establishment, but running for the US Senate while they were openly endorsing his opponent would have been impossible for Hackett. The precinct captains, the top tier activists who have the networks of seasoned volunteers on call, the big money contributors - all would be lined up against Hackett. Sure, he could have tried an outsider campaign but the chances of that succeeding were nil. He is a political neophyte, going up against the party machine. Easy for all of us here to say, "Screw the establishment and run!" but seriously put yourselves in Hackett's shoes and consider, after everything you've been through, if you would really want to subject yourself and your family to that.
|
John Q. Citizen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-15-06 12:21 AM
Response to Original message |
7. Hackett said on Ed schultz today that |
|
Reid has always treated him well. Here the interview with Hackett. http://www.bigeddieradio.com/
|
FreedomAngel82
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-15-06 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
8. I'll have to go and listen |
FreedomAngel82
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-15-06 01:23 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
14. So what's the deal now? |
John Q. Citizen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-15-06 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
16. What do you mean? n/t |
Pab Sungenis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-15-06 12:26 AM
Response to Original message |
|
that the Party will not back him, even if he wins.
This happens all the time. When a candidate wins a primary without the organization's endorsement, then they will not campaign for him, will not put up signs for him, will not buy ad time, will not knock on doors, will not phone bank, and a good number will not pull the lever on election day.
We had a similar situation here in Southern New Jersey last fall. One of the Republican Assembly candidates in the first district "forgot" to file his paperwork, and the organization put up an alternative as a write-in in the primary. An insurgent candidate beat their anointed one. The other Assembly candidate refused to run with him. No names on signs. Never mentioned in the ads. The organiztion shut him out.
As a result, BOTH Republicans got trounced in the race.
If Paul Hackett had won the primary with the organization against him, he would have had no chance in the general.
|
FreedomAngel82
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-15-06 01:06 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
11. So couldn't he do things his way? |
|
Local press and radio and liberal radio etc? Internet? Grass rooting efforts?
|
rucky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-15-06 02:47 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
15. That's what happened to Howard Dean |
|
it's the DSCC/DCCC - they think they run the show. The Senate is so elitist it's sickening, and they don't want brash yahoos who speak their mind coming into the House of Lords and mucking it up. People like that belong in the House of Commons.
I finally got the DSCC to stop sending me their whoring emails every day.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:01 AM
Response to Original message |