Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Assuming that the Abramoff scandal leads to resignations & convictions...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
paulthompson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-03-06 07:05 PM
Original message
Assuming that the Abramoff scandal leads to resignations & convictions...
How would that directly affect the balance of the House and Senate? If a Congressperson has to step down, the governor of that state makes an interim appointment, no? So in how many cases would a Democratic governor be able to replace a Republican with a Democrat, or vise versa?

Perhaps someone politically savvy can figure this out using this list:

http://www.thinkprogress.org/abramoff

Is it possible for the Dems to make major gains on the Reps before the 2006 elections, due to the Abramoff scandal alone? Or, failing that, which of the politicans listed above might be particularly vulnerable to lose their seats in 2006?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
arcos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-03-06 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. Only Senators can be appointed by Governors in case of a vacancy...
In case of vacacancies in the House, a special election would probably be called, although it would depend on how close resignations are to the November elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-03-06 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. What happened to Duke Cunningham's seat
He is going to jail, so did they have a special election or has he been replaced? That might tell us what will happen when, eg, Bob Ney has to step down, or Burns maybe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sleipnir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-04-06 01:04 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Special Election.
It's coming up soon, I believe...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-03-06 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. If it turns out to be a really big wholesale scandal, is there any
provision for holding special elections? It seems that they would be in order if many members needed to be replaced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-03-06 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. I don't think we have enough info to make an informed judgment yet
In the Senate, it would seem that Conrad Burns of Montana is in trouble, and that could be good for the Democrats, as Montana has been trending more Democratic since the election of Gov. Schweitzer. It's hard to be specific beyond that, but surely Tom DeLay is history, regardless how much more far-reaching this may be or not.

As to congressional replacements in lieu of resignation, not all states are the same. That makes things a lot murkier. Some require special elections. Others have their state legislatures choose. Yes, sometimes governors choose. Before one can judge whether it will affect the balance, he must know more particulars.

It's sure an interesting question. I believe only those most heavily involved will have problems legally. I think ALL of those invloved will have problems politically.

That's my short take.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulthompson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-04-06 01:03 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Thanks
I did not know that.

Another question would be: how many of the Abramoff tainted senators are up for reelection in 2006?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woodsprite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-03-06 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
5. Would the emergency powers ruling kick in. I'm sure I don't
have the name right, but it's where they passed some kind of ruling that if for some reason a majority of Congress can't make it to their respective places, that they could run with who they have left. Does it specifically rule out scandalous, ridden-out-on-a-rail Congressmen/women as being an emergency - or is the "emergency" up for interpretation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orangepeel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-04-06 01:08 AM
Response to Original message
8. It depends on the state
usually, the governor appoints a replacement for a senator. Representative are replaced by a special election if there is more than a certain amount of time left in the term or the seat is just left empty until the next regular election if there is less than that amount of time.

In Florida, I believe that there is a special election if there is more than a year left in the term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC