Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Partial birth abortion law question.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
TNDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 07:36 PM
Original message
Partial birth abortion law question.
I was in a nursing class today and abortion was being discussed. Don't even get me started on all the crap I had to listen to. What I want to ask (and can't seem to find on the internet) is at what gestational age is abortion illegal? The teacher said abortion in legal in all 50 states up to 40 weeks of gestation. I was thinking there was a cut-off way before then. What is the real situation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Beaverhausen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. First of all, it's Late Term Abortion
there is no such thing as "partial birth abortion."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KingFlorez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. right
The right-wingers make up words and some people actually start using them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. In some it's 12 weeks and others 14 to 16 I believe...
Edited on Wed Feb-15-06 07:39 PM by cynatnite
I could be wrong, but when I had mine the limit was 12 weeks. The doctor told me that the farther along the fetus is, the more dangerous it is for the woman.

on edit: I should add that late term abortions are very rare and done when the life of the mother is at risk. Partial birth abortion is a repuke term. Don't let anyone tell you different.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rainscents Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. I believe, it's at 12 or 16 weeks for abortion...
Edited on Wed Feb-15-06 07:42 PM by Rainscents
and for partial ( there is no such a thing as "Partial), it ONLY when womens life is in danger and this is VERY rare abortion (usually, still birth or something horrible happen to mother or baby).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
4. I would hope to hell abortions were illegal except for life threatening
factors any time after the 2nd trimester, but I don't factually know the law off the top of my head with this. I hope that's the case though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Book Lover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. May I ask a clarifying question?
Would you also allow a woman to choose abortion over carrying full-term if it was only discovered in her late second-early third trimester that she was carrying a deformed fetus - I mean something on the level of an anencephaly situation. That kind of pregnancy does not threaten the woman's life, but would result in the birth of someone who would live for hours at most. What say you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #14
24. I Meant Life Threatening Factors For Both.
I will also expand that to include other severe fetal abnormalities as well as circumstances where it may not be life threatening to the woman, but would cause serious health or physical implications such as being unable to bear children in the future.

I guess the clarity I should provide is an otherwise healthy fetus growing inside a woman who if carried to term would suffer no additional consequence than those typical of delivery should not have legality to be aborted after the 2nd trimester. I'm not sure if that's already the law or not though I hope it is. Even regardless, the cases must be so miniscule where a request for a 3rd trimester abortion is made when there is no risk to the fetus or mother. I admit I don't have the numbers, but logic would tell me that the majority of 3rd trimester abortions would be due to necessity rather than the mentality of "I just don't want it".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. That's the problem with unnecessary laws...
They become all too restrictive, and can risk lives. I say its up to the medical ethics boards for doctors along with the doctors and patient's themselves, no one else. As you said, the amount of such abortions is so miniscule that it really doesn't warrent passing laws to restrict it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Book Lover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #24
34. Thanks for your clarification
I must say that I differ in my opinion, but I appreciate your reply.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
16. I take it you have little real knowledge of reproduction beyond
the mechanics of sex, because the reasons for late term abortion (most of which happen well before viability) are numerous and tragic.

For instance, some happen when an ultrasound after 12 weeks discovers a birth defect that would make the fetus nonviable were it carried to term, like anencephaly (no brain), or a condition where the brain forms outside the skull, or any of a number of major birth defects which we can't repair with intrauterine surgery. Forcing a woman to carry such a fetus to term only to watch it die within hours is cruel beyond belief to both parents and fetus.

Some happen when the mother becomes ill or injured and continuing the pregnancy would threaten her health and ability to have future children. It's not always life threatening. Sometimes it's the dire consequences for a woman's health that are the issue.

Some happen when it's a young mother who thought the pregnancy would go away if she just didn't think about it. This sort of magical thinking is what we see in eleven year olds, and yes, we're seeing eleven year olds pregnant. Would you endanger a little girl's health her whole life by forcing her to endure a pregnancy and childbirth her body is not prepared for?

Most late term abortions (which, by the way, are a tiny percentage of all abortions) are done on pregnancies that were wanted and for reasons anyone but the most callous or willfully ignorant people would agree with if they bothered to educate themselves.

At some point, men are going to have to trust the wisdom and ethics of health care providers, and the question of late term abortion (more properly second trimester abortion) is one of those times. The last thing anyone needs is for a government of ignorant men to step between a woman and her physician and tell her what care she is allowed and forbidden.

As for third trimester abortions, we call those premature births because every attempt is made to ensure the fetus survives after the age of viability even when accident or illness make it necessary to terminate the pregnancy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wicket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. Thank-you Warpy
:hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #16
25. I Clarified Here (above)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=364&topic_id=434692&mesg_id=435169

I should've been more specific originally. My point was that I would hope 3rd trimester abortions are illegal when it comes to wanting them for reasons unrelated to the health of either party, such as just a "I just don't want the child" request. I agree, chances are those requests wouldn't even be granted, but I would think law would even dictate it couldn't happen for those reasons.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. Sometimes you have to trust the ethics of the medial profession
and this is one of those times.

I can't think of any physician who would abort a healthy fetus near term because of a friviolous reason given by the mother. Such a woman would get a psychiatric evaluation, not an abortion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. I agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TNDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
5. Where can I find the legal facts?
I am not sure that I will actually show them to the teacher (maybe if I grow some testicles but I think she has a set too) but I would at least like to show them to my classmates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beaverhausen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. NARAL might be a good place to look
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Federal law is under a legal injuction at the moment...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. Post 11 and I would DEFINITELY inform your teacher.
Edited on Wed Feb-15-06 07:54 PM by mzmolly
He/she needs an education.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
7. 40 is term and your teacher is grossly misinformed
Under Roe, states can't prohibit first trimester abortions, although several states never changed thier laws. After that legal abortions become restricted in most states.

http://womensissues.about.com/gi/dynamic/offsite.htm?site=http%3A%2F%2Fhometown.aol.com%2Fabtrbng%2Findex.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beaverhausen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. well technically...
...a late term abortion can be done on a full term baby. The only reason that would be done would be if the baby was already dead and if labor would injur or kill the mother. It is very rare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. I never know who to blame for this...
corporate media for not doing a damn thing to educate the public or the public for not educating themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Katherine Brengle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #21
33. both. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Extend a Hand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
10. there is no such thing
as a 'partial birth abortion'
that is RW framing. See the article 'The "Partial-Birth" Myth'

http://www.slate.com/id/2090201/#ContinueArticle

Restrictions on abortion vary by state. At the NARAL site below you can
see what the restrictions are by state.

http://www.prochoiceamerica.org/choice-action-center/in_your_state/who-decides/

History of Abortion:
http://www.feminist.com/resources/ourbodies/abortion.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
11. That's bologna.
Edited on Wed Feb-15-06 08:36 PM by mzmolly

http://www.crlp.org/pub_fac_abortion_laws.html

See here:


Albania
Armenia
Austria*
Azerbaijan
Bahrain
Belarus
Belgium*
Bosnia-
Herzegovina–PA
Bulgaria
Cambodia*
Canada°
Cape Verde
China°–S
Croatia–PA
Cuba–PA
Czech Rep.–PA
Dem. People’s Rep. of
Korea°
Denmark–PA
Estonia
France*
Fmr. Yugoslav Rep. Macedonia–PA
Georgia
Germany*
Greece–PA
Guyana†
Hungary
Italy–Δ/PA
Kazakhstan
Kyrgyzstan
Latvia
Lithuania
Moldova
Mongolia
Nepal–S
Netherlandsv
Norway–PA
Puerto Ricov
Romania*
Russian Fed.
Serbia
& Montenegro–PA
Singapore***
Slovak Rep.–PA
Slovenia–PA
South Africa
Sweden**
Switzerland
Tajikistan
Tunisia
Turkey–‡SA/PA
Turkmenistan
Ukraine
United States–v◊PA
Uzbekistan
Vietnam°

Note: All Countries have a gestational limit of 12 weeks unless otherwise denoted. Gestational limits are calculated from the first day of the last menstrual period, which is generally considered to occur two weeks before conception. Statutory gestational limits calculated from the date of conception have thus been extended by two weeks.

∆Gestational limit of 90 days
†Gestational limit of 8 weeks
‡Gestational limit of 10 weeks
*Gestational limit of 14 weeks
**Gestational limit of 18 weeks
***Gestational limit of 24 weeks

R-Abortion permitted in cases of rape
R1-Abortion permitted in the case of rape of a woman with a mental disability
I-Abortion permitted in cases of incest
F-Abortion permitted in cases of fetal impairment
SA-Spousal authorization required
PA-Parental authorization/notification required
◊= Federal system in which abortion law is determined at state level; classification reflects legal status of abortion for largest number of people
x-Recent legislation eliminated all exceptions to prohibition on abortion; availability of defense of necessity highly unlikely
S-Sex selective abortion prohibited
U-Law unclear


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Book Lover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Not so
Planned Parenthood here in CA will perform termination services up to 14 weeks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Do you have a link?
While we are only talking a 2 week difference here, but I'd like to see some documentation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Book Lover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. When you are pregnant and don't want to be
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. I'm pro-choice.
I think your having an argument with yourself here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Book Lover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #23
35. You are not the only one reading my reply (nm)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #15
32. 12 vs. 14 weeks.
From my post above: Note: All Countries have a gestational limit of 12 weeks unless otherwise denoted. Gestational limits are calculated from the first day of the last menstrual period, which is generally considered to occur two weeks before conception. Statutory gestational limits calculated from the date of conception have thus been extended by two weeks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
19. This page from NARAL should answer your questions...
It shows what is going on the various states. I think your teacher would be surprised at how effectively some states have been doing away with this right in bits and pieces.

http://www.naral.org/choice-action-center/in_your_state/who-decides/

State profiles
http://www.naral.org/choice-action-center/in_your_state/who-decides/state-profiles/

Maps and charts
http://www.naral.org/choice-action-center/in_your_state/who-decides/maps-and-charts/

Maps and Charts
Abortion Bans

Biased Counseling and Mandatory Delay

Emergency Contraception (EC)

Freedom of Choice Acts

Insurance Coverage for Contraception

Insurance Prohibition for Abortion

Low-Income Women's Access to Abortion

Protection from Clinic Violence

Refusal to Provide Medical Services

Restrictions on Young Women's Access to Abortion

State Constitutional Protection

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
20. Google "Roe v. Wade."
The initial decision specified that abortion was basically unimpeded during the first trimester, could be regulated more extensively by the states during the second, and could be prohibited by the states during the third, but had to have an exception for the life/health of the mother.

"Casey" changed the standard from a trimester-focus to a viability focus.

These decisions regulate how far each individual state may go in terms of its regulation.

The PBA was the first time Congress attempted to regulate abortion on a national level; it was quickly stayed pending judicial review.

It has been struck by three states: (1) due to lack of a health exception for the mother. I also belief that Congress regulating this nationally, based upon its Commerce Power, is borderline in terms of constitutionality.

That's my understanding, based upon what I learned in law school (quick and dirty summary). Corrections, anyone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maru Kitteh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
29. From Planned Parenthood's website
When are abortions performed?

Most abortions — nearly 90 percent — are provided in the first trimester — the first three months of pregnancy. Fewer than 11 percent take place in the second trimester. Abortion is very rare and only done for serious health reasons after 24 weeks.

The Earlier, the Better

Try to arrange an abortion as soon as you have made up your mind. Earlier abortions are easier and safer than abortions later in pregnancy. They also cost less.
http://www.plannedparenthood.org/pp2/portal/files/portal/medicalinfo/abortion/pub-abortion-q-and-a.xml


40 states have laws prohibiting abortion after viability
POST-VIABILITY ABORTION BANS

Forty states and the District of Columbia have laws banning most post-viability abortions (AL, AZ, AR, CA, CT, DE, FL, GA, ID, IL, IN, IA, KS, KY, LA, ME, MD, MA, MI, MN, MO, MT, NE, NV, NH, NY, NC, ND, OH, OK, PA, RI, SC, SD, TN, TX, UT, VA, WA, WI, WY).
http://members.aol.com/abtrbng/stablw.htm

Viability is generally accepted to be highly unlikely to ever cross the threshold of less than 23 weeks.
A fetus is viable when it reaches an "anatomical threshold" when critical organs, such as the lungs and kidneys, can sustain independent life. Until the air sacs are mature enough to permit gases to pass into and out of the bloodstream, which is extremely unlikely until at least 23 weeks gestation (from last menstrual period), a fetus cannot be sustained even with a respirator, which can force air into the lungs but cannot pass gas from the lungs into the bloodstream.(4)
http://www.ppacca.org/site/pp.asp?c=kuJYJeO4F&b=139571

Most states put viability at 27 or 28 weeks. In other words your teacher is wrong as hell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baby_bear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
30. States may restrict abortion during the third trimester for the fetus
Edited on Wed Feb-15-06 08:35 PM by baby_bear
per Roe v. Wade.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roe_v._Wade
<snip>
State laws outlawing abortion were set aside by the Court, permitting abortions throughout pregnancy. Noting that induced early abortions had become safer than childbirth and holding that the word "person" in the Constitution of the United States "does not include the unborn," the court defined, within each of the three stages of pregnancy, the reciprocal limits of state power and individual freedom: (a) During the first trimester, the abortion decision and its effectuation must be left to the medical judgment of the pregnant woman's attending physician. (b) After the first trimester, the State, in promoting its interest in the health of the mother, may, if it chooses, regulate the abortion procedure in ways that are reasonably related to maternal health.(c) For the stage subsequent to viability, the State, in promoting its interest in the potentiality of human life may, if it chooses, regulate and even proscribe abortion, except where it is necessary, in appropriate medical judgment, for the preservation of the life or health of the mother. In 1980, however, the Court refused to apply this ruling to require the federal government to bear the cost of abortions for women who could not afford them.
</snip>

b_b

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Katherine Brengle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
31. Please don't use their language. It's "late term abortion" not "partial
birth abortion."

As far as I know, this procedure is never performed unless there are extreme circumstances--if the mother is going to die if it is not done or if the baby is either dead already or severely damaged (for instance, if there were major development problems during the pregnancy).

This practice is EXTREMELY RARE. It is not a normal procedure. Most abortions are done during the first trimester.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC