Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If Cheney admitted to declassifying intel and told Libby to expose

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 10:52 AM
Original message
If Cheney admitted to declassifying intel and told Libby to expose
Plame, then the real question is why? To me, it sounds like Cheney admitted to criminal activity on national television. Why would a Vice President fess up to giving an underling declassified information in order to out a fellow American citizen; one which has been charged with defending America? I don't think Cheney realizes what he admitted to. I think his political career will be over soon or we will go to war with Iran as a grand distraction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. Shrub admits repeatedly that he's breaking the law with wiretaps
and no one will do anything about it, why should Darth be worried.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Talismom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. It's just like Andrew Jackson...the congress tells him that the
Cherokee relocation is illegal and he replies, "Fine, so stop me from doing it!"

These guys won't stop their raping and pillaging til they're dragged away!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Very good point
Crime in broad day light, on national TVEE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
2. US Media will ignore the implication - lest they get ahead of known facts!
The BS excuses just flow from our media workers (actually the editors and RW owners - the "workers" try to do their best)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
3. Cheney did not admit to specifically declassifying any particular doc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
4. Keep your eye on the ball, grasshopper...
Think back to where this started, the administration "took the leak seriously" and "would find who was responsible".

Turns out that revealing the identity of the covert operative who was watching Iran for WMD proliferation, was performed as a conscious, strategic decision by the President and Vice President. Don't get all hung up on the legalities. From my perspective, the Fitzgerald investigation was begun to prove what Cheney has just admitted to - he directed his staff to reveal Plame's identity.

I like a good perp walk as much as the next guy, but discrediting these guys and their failed ideology is the bigger goal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
7. 'Declassifying' proves "INTENT" to out a spy and that is TREASON.!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
8. He's desperate.
He knows what's coming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
9. He didn't say he declassified anything, just that
the claim that authorizing the release of an NIE (not Plame-related, IIRC) would have been ok. The executive order claimed to extend the permission is from 3/25/03, revising a Clinton EO stipulating classification authority; I'm guessing the logic is that if you have the authority to classify things, you can declassify things. I'm unaware of any evidence that Libby actually publicized the contents of the NIE prior to its formal declassification.

The NIE was declassified the next month, and released. July '03. It's the same time frame as the Plame business, and possibly related by having been part of the same discussions, intended to buttress their justification for invading Iraq.

There's some sort of proof needed to show that he actually declassified something, and to tie it in with Plame. But I'm also guessing that Plame's status would not fall under his authority for declassification. Else Libby's little mess could have been cleaned up with a quick phone call, and Fitzgerald would get back to working full-time on the Muslim charity case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC