Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Jan. 7 Rasmussen: DeWine 43% Hackett 39%, DeWine 45% Brown 40%

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
tgnyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 12:04 PM
Original message
Jan. 7 Rasmussen: DeWine 43% Hackett 39%, DeWine 45% Brown 40%
Discuss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tiggeroshii Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. That's January 7.
The latest polls show both Brown and HAckett ahead...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tgnyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. link?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tiggeroshii Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. here ya go -this is zogby, wsj tho
Edited on Thu Feb-16-06 01:38 PM by Tiggeroshii
http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/info-flash05a.html?project=elections06-ft&h=495&w=778&hasAd=1

Do you know if the rasmussen poll you are referring to is withint he margin of error?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. Fucking up an election is hard work when your opponent
is self-destructing in front of you.

The Democrat Losers Club is having to put in overtime on their magnificent efforts to blow 2006.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullimiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. if you accept as valid it shows statistically no difference.
im sure the polls error is at least a few points.
so who is the better candidate from here on out? obviously those with clout thought it was brown.
i understand the desire to avoid the expense and effort of a primary battle.
was it right? dunno, its politics though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corkhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. When the dust settles, Brown will be the front runner.
Whether Diebold will let him win is another matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
5. But, we should mention also that Hackett's own internal polling...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
6. Here are some numbers that show a different picture
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=172x12602

Sherrod Brown…...………41
Sherrod Brown (lean)……3
Mike DeWine………..…....38
Mike DeWine (lean)……....3
Neither/other (VOL)…..…7
Not sure………………...........8
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tgnyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. 44%/41%.Within MOE. Statististical tie. Same as in the original post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
7. So what? they both had/have an equal chance at beating Dewine
Hackett didn't have to get out of the race, you know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stewie Donating Member (244 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
9. I love Paul Hackett, but...
...if he and Brown are statiscally identical in the polls (each of those margins are within the margin of error) and Brown has more cash on hand, it's best to prevent a primary that would bleed that and go with the more prepared candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. That is what I have been trying to tell everyone here for two days
Now an all out effort can be mounted against Dewine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lexingtonian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
13. a fairly useless polling

Those are essentially the generic partisan baselines in Ohio- 45% R, 40-42% D.

The only interesting thing about the poll is that all the swing voters have backed off from DeWine this early. They've been leaving Republican incumbents far in advance of election day this cycle- you see it first in the very Blue states late last fall, it shows up in the Purple States in the last month or two, in a couple of months it'll begin to appear in deeply Red States.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tgnyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. You mean this tells us nothing about the relative strength of the two
Democrats? Any two Democrats would have polled those numbers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC