tgnyc
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-16-06 12:04 PM
Original message |
Jan. 7 Rasmussen: DeWine 43% Hackett 39%, DeWine 45% Brown 40% |
Tiggeroshii
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-16-06 12:07 PM
Response to Original message |
|
The latest polls show both Brown and HAckett ahead...
|
tgnyc
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-16-06 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
Tiggeroshii
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-16-06 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
12. here ya go -this is zogby, wsj tho |
|
Edited on Thu Feb-16-06 01:38 PM by Tiggeroshii
|
Jackpine Radical
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-16-06 12:08 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Fucking up an election is hard work when your opponent |
|
is self-destructing in front of you.
The Democrat Losers Club is having to put in overtime on their magnificent efforts to blow 2006.
|
bullimiami
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-16-06 12:08 PM
Response to Original message |
3. if you accept as valid it shows statistically no difference. |
|
im sure the polls error is at least a few points. so who is the better candidate from here on out? obviously those with clout thought it was brown. i understand the desire to avoid the expense and effort of a primary battle. was it right? dunno, its politics though.
|
corkhead
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-16-06 12:09 PM
Response to Original message |
4. When the dust settles, Brown will be the front runner. |
|
Whether Diebold will let him win is another matter.
|
SteppingRazor
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-16-06 12:10 PM
Response to Original message |
5. But, we should mention also that Hackett's own internal polling... |
liberal N proud
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-16-06 12:11 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Here are some numbers that show a different picture |
|
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=172x12602Sherrod Brown
...
41 Sherrod Brown (lean)
3 Mike DeWine
..
....38 Mike DeWine (lean)
....3 Neither/other (VOL)
..
7 Not sure
...........8
|
tgnyc
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-16-06 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
8. 44%/41%.Within MOE. Statististical tie. Same as in the original post. |
WI_DEM
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-16-06 12:14 PM
Response to Original message |
7. So what? they both had/have an equal chance at beating Dewine |
|
Hackett didn't have to get out of the race, you know.
|
Stewie
(244 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-16-06 12:15 PM
Response to Original message |
9. I love Paul Hackett, but... |
|
...if he and Brown are statiscally identical in the polls (each of those margins are within the margin of error) and Brown has more cash on hand, it's best to prevent a primary that would bleed that and go with the more prepared candidate.
|
liberal N proud
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-16-06 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
11. That is what I have been trying to tell everyone here for two days |
|
Now an all out effort can be mounted against Dewine.
|
Lexingtonian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-16-06 01:58 PM
Response to Original message |
13. a fairly useless polling |
|
Those are essentially the generic partisan baselines in Ohio- 45% R, 40-42% D.
The only interesting thing about the poll is that all the swing voters have backed off from DeWine this early. They've been leaving Republican incumbents far in advance of election day this cycle- you see it first in the very Blue states late last fall, it shows up in the Purple States in the last month or two, in a couple of months it'll begin to appear in deeply Red States.
|
tgnyc
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-16-06 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
14. You mean this tells us nothing about the relative strength of the two |
|
Democrats? Any two Democrats would have polled those numbers?
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:40 AM
Response to Original message |