Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fed Judge Orders Justice Dept to Release Wiretapping Docs Within 20 Days

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 01:59 PM
Original message
Fed Judge Orders Justice Dept to Release Wiretapping Docs Within 20 Days
AP Washington

By PETE YOST
Associated Press Writer

February 16, 2006, 1:25 PM EST


WASHINGTON -- A federal judge dealt a setback to the Bush administration on its warrantless surveillance program, ordering the Justice Department on Thursday to release documents about the highly classified effort within 20 days or compile a list of what it is withholding.

U.S. District Judge Henry Kennedy said a private group will suffer irreparable harm if the documents it has been seeking since December are not processed promptly under the Freedom of Information Act.

The Justice Department failed to meet the time restraints under FOIA and failed to make a case that it was impractical to deal quickly with the request by the Electronic Privacy Information Center.

Justice Department spokesman Charles Miller said no determination has been made as to what the government's next step will be.

http://www.newsday.com/news/politics/wire/sns-ap-domestic-spying-courts,0,240865.story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. good
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stop the bleeding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. we'll see if the DOj complies n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. IT WILL BE THE SAME GAME
Stall, stall, stall
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Yep - there are a hundred legal maneuvers for them to use.
Someone will have to leak them; just like the torture photos.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Oh of course
Don't you know they're above the law?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. they've managed to hold off a judicial order for 1 1/2 years
in the ACLU case--don't hold your breath
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Are we wagering on the likelihood of compliance?
I would guess the odds are prohibitively long against. The * maladministration has displayed a historical disregard for the "rule of law" except that one famously farcical instance late in 1999, the day our Democracy died.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suffragette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
5. I wonder if they will release these
or if they will appeal endlessly as has been done with the torture evidence in the ACLU's case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ArbustoBuster Donating Member (956 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
8. There should be a law...
...that if any member of the executive branch fails to enforce - in a timely manner - a lawful decision by the judicial branch, he'll be fed into a woodchipper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
10. Well now
Must be one of those liberal activist judges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rebelry Donating Member (72 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
11. A little progress... Even if they do stall.
Gotta keep picking away at them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
12. They'll appeal.
And appeal. Then, change arguments, file baseless motions. It'll go on and on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
13. judges opinion here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC