Joe for Clark
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-16-06 09:16 PM
Original message |
I am asking - no one has spoken about the sequence |
|
In that Cheney report - at all. Is that right??
If this is so, I will sit on my email button until it goes thru - I just don't want to do that if it has been done.
It is one of those if a than b problems - his math doesn't work, just doesn't.
Surprised Dick Morris was close - Guess he grew up with some drunk hunters in his day.
The sequence of events is bullshit- and that could be proven, one way or the other if it is.
Was this picked up??
Joe
|
Che_Nuevara
(517 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-16-06 09:18 PM
Response to Original message |
1. This was discussed a bit, |
|
particularly in the thread that originally posted the whole transcript (I don't have the link to the thread anymore -- sorry.)
|
samdogmom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-16-06 09:21 PM
Response to Original message |
2. The frightening thing is that IT JUST DOESN'T MATTER! |
|
Unless the guy dies, this is over. Cheney is off the hook, he's gotten away with "attempted" murder. I guess in America some of us are more equal than others!
|
Auntie Bush
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-16-06 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
6. Do some people think it was attempted murder? Why would he want to |
|
shoot his friend in fromt of all those wittinesses? That doesn't make sense to me. What was his motive? Clue me in. I'm not saying I wouldn't believe that but I have no clue as to a motive.
|
samdogmom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-16-06 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
9. Figurative "attempted" murder, sorry! |
|
Edited on Thu Feb-16-06 10:10 PM by samdogmom
I didn't mean it literally. But, he has been able to shoot someone at point-blank range with virtually no questions from law enforcement. It's frightening to me, because I have often lamented--in disgust to my friends when I see the administration getting away with another jaw-dropping atrocity--that they could kill someone on TV in broad daylight and their defenders would excuse their every last move. I simply don't get it!
|
Auntie Bush
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-16-06 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
10. Thanks for explaining...I should have known. Good, now I won't have to |
|
take my tin foil hat out of the closet!
|
sam sarrha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-16-06 09:28 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Dead Eye Dick told the Sheriff he'd have to wait 14 hours for a statement, |
|
Edited on Thu Feb-16-06 09:28 PM by sam sarrha
so what were they all high on, other than Jesus..?? OxyContin..?? or something your can piss of in 14 hours
|
Joe for Clark
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-16-06 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
8. The thing is, if its true something nefarious was going, |
|
Your going to leave a trace. I called back east - I don't know anyone that believes the one beer story. They are hunters - they know better. Some percentage of people are already tipped.
Anyway, if Whittington was drinking, and you gotta belive blood tests were taken, it won't matter what Cheney says at this point. His star witness already says they were drinking only Dr Pepper.
The sequence is wrong, a mistake on his part. It will be exploited, unless you believe two and two equals five. Can't be the only mistake, either. He didn't have enough time to do more.
And interesting situation.
Joe
|
TomInTib
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-16-06 09:30 PM
Response to Original message |
4. If you can shine some light on the gaps and hiccups.... |
jimshoes
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-16-06 09:35 PM
Response to Original message |
|
story of cheney's is like a big pus filled zit. If no one pokes it it will go away eventually, if on the other hand somebody gives it a mighty squeeze, well, zit juice everywhere. Who's gonna squeeze though?
|
WhiteTara
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-16-06 09:41 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Tweety put up a timeline n/t |
Joe for Clark
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-16-06 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
|
No, no no - don't need a timeline. Simpler than that.
Clearly Matthews really is an idiot.
Group of people go out. Two group of prey spotted, one than the other. Part of your group (Whittington) shoot and kill part of the first prey group. Later a second group spotted and than the accident.
The problem for Dick is, by his own account, he knew where his friend was and where he went when he went after group 2---by virtue of being in the first group he saw the second. It is a big problem for him. He knew where he was, he knew where he was shooting, he knew where his friend went and he didn't look.
It is a matter of negligence.
I think it is quite compelling - and that is from the cleaned up after reports.
Joe
|
madokie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-16-06 10:27 PM
Response to Original message |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue May 14th 2024, 12:08 AM
Response to Original message |