Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush is on Psych Meds to control psychotic symptoms including paranoia

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
PhilipShore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 12:12 PM
Original message
Bush is on Psych Meds to control psychotic symptoms including paranoia
Capitol Hill Blue
Bush Taking Anti-Depressants to Control Mood Swings
Jul 28, 2004

http://www.capitolhillblue.com/artman/publish/article_4921.shtml

President George W. Bush is taking anti-depressant drugs to control his erratic behavior, depression and paranoia, Capitol Hill Blue has learned.

Tubb prescribed the anti-depressants after a clearly-upset Bush stormed off stage on July 8, refusing to answer reporters' questions about his relationship with indicted Enron executive Kenneth J. Lay.

“Keep those motherfuckers away from me,” he screamed at an aide backstage. “If you can’t, I’ll find someone who can.”

Although GOP loyalists dismissed the reports an anti-Bush propaganda, the reports were later confirmed by prominent George Washington University psychiatrist Dr. Justin Frank in his book Bush on the Couch: Inside the Mind of the President. Dr. Frank diagnosed the President as a “paranoid meglomaniac” and “untreated alcoholic” whose “lifelong streak of sadism, ranging from childhood pranks (using firecrackers to explode frogs) to insulting journalists, gloating over state executions and pumping his hand gleefully before the bombing of Baghdad” showcase Bush’s instabilities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. How did I know this was a Doug Thompson "scoop"?
Edited on Fri Feb-17-06 12:13 PM by wtmusic
:silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. The same way I did- smell?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Aha (lol)... I thought it was a sixth sense
but it was good ol' number five
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. oh, CHB again
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CottonBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. PhilipShore: CHB is not a credible DU news source.
Edited on Fri Feb-17-06 12:31 PM by CottonBear
However, we do suspect that Bush has some sort of physical or mental health problems but exactly what is not known. He does seem to be a mean drunk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. Even the article itself could benefit from proofreading.
Almost like an underfunded FOX.

But it's clear that Bush is off his rocker, still holding on to enough awareness to eventually pay the legal price for his criminality.

Many in the administration are poster children for mental and personality "difficulties".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RazzleDazzle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #4
30. That's the opinion of some...
I find it at least as credible as MSM sources and probably more so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DELUSIONAL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
33. NYT is not a credible news source
Judith Miller.

NYT helped the with cover up of bushie spying on millions of Americans etc. The news was reported until long AFTER the 2004 elections.

Lots of reasons that I don't believe NYT -- I want to see a second source or third or fourth.

Any news source requires a certain amount of skepticism -- any reporter can get scammed by the scum bags out there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Devlzown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
5. All I can say is, the meds aren't working.
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FormerRepublican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Aw - you beat me to it! I was going to say that....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PhilipShore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
8. GOP consultant: We have to face the possibility that Bush is loony tunes
http://www.capitolhillblue.com/cgi-bin/artman/exec/view.cgi?archive=33&num=5141

One long-time GOP political consultant who – for obvious reasons – asked not to be identified said he is advising his Republican Congressional candidates to keep their distance from Bush.

“We have to face the very real possibility that the President of the United States is loony tunes,” he says sadly. “That’s not good for my candidates, it’s not good for the party and it’s certainly not good for the country.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrotherBuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #8
22. I'll jump on this bandwagon as soon as Doug Thompson names....
one source or connects one allegation to a face. Ghost quotes are totally unacceptable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthpower Donating Member (15 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Ghost quotes are used by MSM all the time
That's because more often than not it's self-destructive to go on the record with frank appraisals of one's employer.

If you choose to not trust the source that's one thing. But journalism as a whole would pretty much dry up and blow away without info. from anonymous sources.

I think Thompson is great, and I trust his reporting. He made a correction when a correction was due in a much more honest and contrite manner than is typical.

No one here or anywhere else has been able to malign Thompson on specifics. It's all reflexive character assassination if you ask me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrotherBuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. LOL, Thompson made the correction when....
Edited on Fri Feb-17-06 04:53 PM by BrotherBuzz
The guy ceased to exist and all his other sources said that the guy never existed. What's wrong with that picture?

There is a world of difference between a ghost quote and an unnamed source.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
area51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. Welcome to DU, truthpower. (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #23
29. Hi truthpower!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az_lefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
9. It's been obvious for a long time that he was loony tunes...
but WTF are we suppose to do about it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. A link for you all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
10. It's posts like this that make me wish we had an UN-recommend button
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TallahasseeGrannie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
12. Wishful thinking
and hyperbole. This is not a reputable source. Worse than the Enquirer, which sometimes gets a scoop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PhilipShore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Good point
Edited on Fri Feb-17-06 02:42 PM by PhilipShore
But the Dems give up -- wonderful opportunities -- to debate the Repukes with Democratic PR.

Capitol Hill blue is written by a Republican; but he talks about some issues that are favorable to Dems, and not all of his stories are Wishful thinking and hyperbole.

99% of all Repuke language is “Wishful thinking and hyperbole,” and the Repukes believe it, the Dems should just repeat it by a PR technique called anti-poetry -- which is when your adversary has a argument that is absurd, just repeat it, and then that shows the inaccuracies in the argument.

Limbaugh, is a typical Republican that uses the language of “Wishful thinking and hyperbole,” which is language similar to the Enquirer.

However, with him because his is staged propaganda -- is to have a different tactic, which is to counter argue with facts. Such as Limbaugh associates all Democrats as being liberals, and obvious falsehood, because liberal Democrats are a minority in the Democratic Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TallahasseeGrannie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. Well, you have some valid
points. But I think there are enough awful things that are TRUE about Bush (that we know for certain) that we don't have to go to lies. (or shaky stories) And I'm not comfortable with vilifying him for taking psychotrophic meds, since I have more than a passing acquaintance with them myself and there are a whole LOT of folks out there doing a fine job in life with a little help from modern chemistry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
13. Can we get a sticky that says "CAPITAL HILL BLUE IS NOT A CREDIBLE SOURCE"
Sorry, it just isn't. It is like fan fiction, or the Weekly World News. Fun to read, but not credible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. Oh I didn't know this was LBN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthpower Donating Member (15 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. Really? I know of one correction he made based on a bad source
Thompson was contrite and honest in his apology. Rather than draping him in a shroud of nebulous taint, name more than one specific instance in which he erred.

The criticisms of Thompson that I see here are typically Pavolovian but when push comes to shove, lack any substance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #21
28. Hey WELCOME TO DU!
:hi:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrotherBuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #21
31. One correction and six scrubs...
Thompson used "that" source six times over twenty years. Six stories that quoted "that" individual as an unnamed source have been removed from CHB article database. A search of other news sources through the Internet and on Nexis finds no evidence that any of those six stories were published elsewhere. If you can't read it, it didn't happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cassiepriam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
16. Shrub needs to be on a lot more thant just an anti-dep
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeveneightyWhoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
17. Oh, I thought you meant it was wishful thinking that..
Edited on Fri Feb-17-06 02:57 PM by SeveneightyWhoa
..Bush was on meds.

Because, even if prescribed, he is clearly not taking them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
19. There is a heckuva lot of denial going on in reply to your post...
:wtf:

I agree with those who say the meds aren't working.

But then again, I'm not sure you can medicate sociopaths...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
24. He needs to have his meds upped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zippy890 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
27. makes sense to me - just look & listen to the guy
bush is scared shitless and medicated
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #27
32. I love threads where people have aneurisms over this man. He's been right
a lot of the time and he hates bush. that makes him my guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC