Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Vermont proposes bill to outlaw spying without court order

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
shance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 07:21 PM
Original message
Vermont proposes bill to outlaw spying without court order
All politics are local. Take back your country.



Vermont proposes bill to outlaw spying without court order

By Adam Silverman

Vermont legislators will debate a resolution that criticizes President Bush's controversial surveillance program and seeks to prevent eavesdropping without a court order from occurring in the state.

The measure is the first of its kind in the country, according to the Massachusetts-based Bill of Rights Defense Committee.

(snip)

Fisher's nonbinding resolution says surveillance without warrants lacks "any plausible legal authority."

"These actions diminish the rule of law and do not enhance national security," reads a section of the measure, which Fisher introduced Wednesday.

A central provision urges all state and local government agencies, businesses and residents to obtain an assurance that surveillance is court-approved before they participate in NSA eavesdropping. Fisher's measure also asks the Attorney General's Office to become involved with cases in which someone is asked to cooperate without receiving an assurance.

(snip)

"I'm astounded the president thinks he can go around the judiciary," Fisher said. "If you buy the argument that he can, then there's no limit to his power."

Co-sponsors of the resolution include Democrats and Progressives but no Republicans.

(snip)

The bill, if passed, would not require Douglas' signature because the measure is a resolution, Gibbs said.

"The governor hopes that this issue will be resolved by the Congress in a way that protects civil liberties," he said. "It's unnecessary for Vermont to take any additional action."

In Massachusetts, Bill of Rights Defense Committee director Nancy Talanian said no other state or local legislative body has considered any measure similar to Fisher's. The defense committee, whose mission statement calls for supporting civil liberties, hopes Vermont's action against wiretapping without warrants will catch on elsewhere.

"Vermont's resolution is making this a local issue, which of course it is, because the wiretapping is going on nationwide," Talanian said. "I hope this and other actions across the country will force the administration to obey the law and the Constitution."




http://www.burlingtonfreepress.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060210/NEWS01/602100318/1009/NEWS05
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. Grand, the exact OPPOSITE of what WH/Roberts deal is all about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Burlington should be our nation's capitol*
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Exactly
They're going to change the law so they can continue to break it. :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurgherHoldtheLies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. Good for you Vermont! I applaud your style.
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. They deserve the applause. Now we just need to be as active citizens
as they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
6. shance
Per DU copyright rules
please post only four
paragraphs from the
copyrighted news source.


Thank you.

NYer99
DU Moderator
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC