Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A translation of Administration comments with regard to UAE port control

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 12:58 PM
Original message
A translation of Administration comments with regard to UAE port control
Edited on Sat Feb-18-06 12:58 PM by Pacifist Patriot
White House NSC spokesman Frederick Jones: the security implications of the deal were "rigorously reviewed."

TRANSLATION: Anyone in a position to profit from this transaction made sure their financial gains were going to be secure.

Rep. Peter King, R-NY spoke to WH officials to urge them to review the purchase. He said he believed the White House took the issue "very seriously and will look into it."

TRANSLATION: Bwaahhhaaa!!! That poor schmuck thinks we might actually care what he thinks.

Treasury Department: "Clearly no responsibility of government is more important than protecting the national security."

TRANSLATION: Especially at the expense of civil liberties. Then we can do whatever the hell we want.

James Lewis, worked with U.S. committee at the State and Commerce Departments: "It's in Dubai's interest to make sure this runs well."

TRANSLATION: I mean really, how can they help terrorists pull off a really nifty attack if they don't have the inside on a well run port?

Steven E. Flynn, Council on Foreign Relations: "You're not going to have a bunch of UAE citizens working the docks. They're longshoremen, vested in high-paying jobs."

TRANSLATION: The UAE citizens will be too busy running the operation and knowing it's ins and outs to work on the docks. Those longshoreman union pukes who get paid too much will be doing the grunt work.

Cynicism aside for the moment I was gratified to see that of the 7 lawmakers pressing the White House, four are Republican. Now for my last question...why aren't all 535 of them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NVMojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. and was this US company's location at 1 hr from Dubai a tradeoff?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC