Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is Barney Fife in charge of protecting us from "terrorists"?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 02:10 PM
Original message
Is Barney Fife in charge of protecting us from "terrorists"?

http://www.nj.com/news/ledger/jersey/index.ssf?/base/news-2/113989617656860.xml&coll=1

Refinery allegedly slated for attack no longer exists
Pa. man suspected of terror plot to blow up ex-facility in Perth Amboy


Federal authorities allege that Michael Curtis Reynolds had plans to blow up the Standard Oil refinery in Perth Amboy as part of a terrorist plot that included damaging the Alaskan pipeline.

But if the 47-year-old Wilkes- Barre, Pa., man ever made it to Perth Amboy, he would have discovered that the refinery no longer exists.

Reynolds was arrested Dec. 5 on an unrelated weapons charge outside Pocatello, Idaho, where he had expected to meet a purported alQaeda operative who was to give him $40,000 to finance the alleged plot, according to federal court transcripts obtained by the Philadelphia Inquirer.

<snip>

Gurganus did not return phone calls yesterday, but Heidi Havens, a spokeswoman for the U.S. Attorney's Office, said, "We're not releasing any information or commenting" on Reynolds, who has not publicly been charged with terrorism.



I wonder if this has any bearing on why they didn't charge him with terrorism
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. They'd probably want to charge him with something like
Terra-imaginating, or PreTerraTending!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluemarkers Donating Member (209 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. yes
though that is rather an insult to Barney


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chi-Town Exile Donating Member (546 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. I think Barney would do a better job of protecting us
from terrorists.

He certainly took his job more seriously than the Bush Administration does when it comes to protecting the American people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnaries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I agree. Even Gomer would do a better job!
Citizen's arrest! Citizen's arrest!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chi-Town Exile Donating Member (546 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Wish we could make a Citizen's arrest of Bush and Cheney! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mme. Defarge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Is there any reason why we can't
do this based on illegal spying without a warrant?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Secret Service might make taking him into custody a little difficult
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
5. Barney was found to be over-qualified.
He had actual law enforcement experience!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
6. Barney was honest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
7. No
If Barney was in charge his intent would be to actually protect us. Also, Andy would be there to back him up and the job would get done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
8. He was going to hide a bomb in the basement of the Alamo!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stopbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
10. Maybe Mr Reynold's was scamming alQaeda.
It's possible he knew the refinery no longer existed. What better way to scam $40000 than to tell
some overseas alQaeda agent that you will destroy a refinery. You get the money, wait a few months, and then
take them to the site: "See, no more refinery."

Another stupid DHS story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spinzonner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
11. Is plotting an imaginary event really a crime ?

How can you plan to blow up something which doesnt exist ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tulum_Moon Donating Member (556 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. I know I am new here
But please stop disparaging Barney Fife. He would have Done a much better job,and yes Andy would have his back. Thanks to all the posters who stuck for him.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC