Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Taking names of those treasonous sobs who support the sale of the ports

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
xiamiam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 10:49 AM
Original message
Taking names of those treasonous sobs who support the sale of the ports
So far today...Lieberman and Chertoff...and 12 members of a secret committee who have decided the fate of our ports for 300 million Americans....and Bush
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TallahasseeGrannie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
1. I can only say...
WTF? DUDE? WHERE ARE MY PORTS?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HockeyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Port of Miami (one port being sold)
nuke fallout probably wouldn't reach you, but could certainly cause major devastation to people living within a 100 mile radius of Miami. Definitely millions of people. You tell me how many people that would be.

As far as Joementum, there are millions of CONNECTICUT residents who would be radiated with a nuke from the Port of New York; Greenwich, Stamford, Bridgeport, to name just a few. Those in the 50 mile radius of the a bomb would be the most affected, including those cities. It's been a long time, so I am trying to jar my memory. My Dad worked the docks at the Port of New York. From what I can remember, these containers are not little, tiny storage spaces. You could certainly fit a decent sized bomb into one of those containers. MUCH BIGGER than a suitcase. It will be virtually impossible to check each and every container coming into these major ports. It is a problem we NOW have.

In all, a nightmare scenario.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laruemtt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
2. LIE-berman??!!! why am i not surprised.
we need to boot him out of the democratic party NOW.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. I just don't get this Jewish/Arab bs
Here's a Jew that does everything for Israel, yet he is willing to sell his own countries ports to his enemies? Another paranoid schizophrenic in power.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
savemefromdumbya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
3. Lieberman seems to be on the side of the terrorists?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xiamiam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
4. so far...this am..seems like the usual suspects..i thought they would send
out more to spin this..im channel surfing and reading..i dont see much support for this...please list any who you her spinning this nonsense...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnceUponTimeOnTheNet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
7. Rice and Snow
~Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said that the administration continued to support the sale and would brief members of Congress on its decision.

"It's the considered opinion of the U.S. government that this can go forward," Rice told Arab journalists yesterday at the State Department in Washington.

Rice, who will visit the UAE next week as part of a three-country Middle East tour, said that there had been a "thorough review" of the sale and "it was decided that this could be done and done safely."

~Snow said yesterday that although he had not seen the congressional requests for an additional review, the committee was "thorough, and carefully considered the issue of national security in that acquisition."

http://www.journalnow.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=WSJ%2FMGArticle%2FWSJ_BasicArticle&c=MGArticle&cid=1137834183260&path=!nationworld&s=
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xiamiam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
8. ok...please correct me if im wrong...but for an issue of this magnitude
it looks like they've got 4 people defending their position...its noon sunday and i truly expected a lot more chatter about this...once again, its just a small handful who are attempting to derail our country
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC