Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Another Error by Ann Coulter

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 09:01 AM
Original message
Another Error by Ann Coulter
Edited on Mon Feb-20-06 09:05 AM by ck4829
The belief that Islam forbids portrayals of Muhammad is recently acquired. Back when Muslims created things, rather than blowing them up, they made paintings, frescoes, miniatures and prints of Muhammad. But apparently the Quran is like the Constitution: It's a ‘living document,’ capable of sprouting all-new provisions at will." Coulter continues, “Making the rash assumption for purposes of discussion that Islam is a religion and not a car-burning cult, even a real religion can't go bossing around other people like this.…But Muslims think they can issue decrees about what images can appear in newspaper cartoons. Who do they think they are, liberals?”

http://www.pfaw.org/pfaw/general/default.aspx?oid=20481

It's not recent.

A movie made in 2004 about Muhammad did not actually show him, but we see his life through the experiences of other people.

http://islam.about.com/od/muhammad/p/muhammad_film.htm

"The Message" which was made all the way back in 1976, also did not show Muhammad.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohammad%2C_Messenger_of_God_%28film%29

It looks like Ann has made yet another mistake, seriously, this must be a record. How can anyone consider her to be a pundit with all of these errors?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. Ann Coulter should be pointed at and laughed at in derision
every time she appears and opens her mouth. Any volunteers? Just point and laugh. Ridicule her and all like her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. She makes sure Young Republicans (aka the campus laughing stocks)
Escort any problematic hecklers to the door. Personally, if one of them ever put their hands on me for calling a monster out he would have my steel-toes in his perfectly straight (thanks to orthodontics) teeth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Form a gauntlet outside and send her on her way with laughter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #4
12. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #12
20. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
StClone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. She'll kill for a cream pie
Literally. She's threatened to hold her ground and waste anybody that lobs cream pies at her now. When she ran for her life from the cream pie last time it really hurt her tough girl appeal. Yeah Annie stand your ground and see what happens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaLynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
2. Ann Coulter making a mistake is like ...
a fish swimming in water. Not only does the fish not know about the water, the fish has never done anything but.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
6. actually she was referring to the middle ages
but she is still wrong. One only has to tour southern Spain or northern Africa to see that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
7. The woman lies through her teeth. She doesn't care about accuracy or truth
I am beginning to think the best way to handle her is just to ignore her as being insignificant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
8. Know nothing loud mouth
What a boorish fool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vogon_Glory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
9. Sorry, ck
Sorry, ck, but the Iranian Shi'a Islamic tradition allowed for a lot more leeway for portraiture and images than did the Sunni Islamic traditions. I'd hesitate to deny that there might have been and might still be Shi'a images of Mohammed somewhere or other in Shi'a-influenced territory.

Having said that, I think that documenting falsehoods from the Coulter-gheist is a good thing. But it does progressives a lot better to have their facts researched and documented.

Most of us have bitter memories of dealing with lying conservatives. The right-wingers think that they have permission from G*d Almighty to lie often, repeatedly, and lie with impunity. Presuming this permission, right-wingers lie shamelessly, often, and with gleeful abandon. But if a progressive should contradict the lying conservative and once, just once, make an error or fail to check a statistic, the right-winger will turn around, brand the progressive as a liar, and brandish the fact of that one accidental falsehood for the next thirty years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. I know, this is what I think about it
I know that portraits and paintings of Muhammad aren't as prohibited as much as the Protesters on the other side of the world think they are.

It looks like it to me that Coulter is insinuating that the Islamic World recently decided that there would be no depictions of Muhammad.

There has been ambiguity in the Islamic World on this and on other subjects as well, but Ann and other RW'ers want to make it look like Muslims can only believe in one thing when it comes to different topics.

Me? I think that portraits and paintings of Muhammad are acceptable, but to say that the entire Muslim world only recently said that they weren't is kind of misleading people.

And, that is my problem with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. True. They do lie with impunity, like Hannity claiming that Cheney 'has no
history of alcohol' ~ two DWIs = no history of alcohol if you're a Republican!

Or Rush, who this week pronounced that the real reason for Paul Hackett having to withdraw from the Senate race was because liberals are 'racist' ~ 'you see, my friends, Brown is BLACK!! From what I'm reading here in the newspaper, the Congressman is BLACK'!

I guess his own racism tells him that if someone's name is 'Brown' that person must be 'black'!

They trade in hate ~ and lies and the sad thing is they make millions doing so ~



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #9
15. True. They do lie with impunity, like Hannity claiming that Cheney 'has no
history of alcohol' ~ two DWIs = no history of alcohol if you're a Republican!

Or Rush, who this week pronounced that the real reason for Paul Hackett having to withdraw from the Senate race was because liberals are 'racist' ~ 'you see, my friends, Brown is BLACK!! From what I'm reading here in the newspaper, the Congressman is BLACK'!

I guess his own racism tells him that if someone's name is 'Brown' that person must be 'black'!

They trade in hate ~ and lies and the sad thing is they make millions doing so ~



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
10. do you think she was thinking about those gorgeous
Persian miniatures? Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't believe the Prophet was depicted in them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blue antidote Donating Member (17 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
11. Different opinions; even within Islam; don't have a pic of a dog or cat
in your house either if an Islamacist visits you!

http://answering-islam.org.uk/Muhammad/pictures.html

Are Pictures of Muhammad Really Forbidden In Islam?

Numerous passages in the Qur’an prohibit idolatry, and worshipping statues or pictures, but there is not even single verse in the Qur’an that explicitly says not to have any pictures of Muhammad. This bears repeating: There is not a single verse in the Qur’an that prohibits making or having pictures of Muhammad or people or animals or trees. In fact, there are some verses in the Qur’an which mention images in a positive context and which therefore presuppose that some statues or images were approved by God, see the article Muhammad and Images.

However, the vast majority of Muslims are Sunni Muslims, who regard six authorized collections of hadiths as the highest written authority in Islam after the Qur’an. The hadiths are records, often very detailed, of what Muhammad taught and did. We give multiple quotations to show that these teachings are not confined to just one writer/collector, but are spread throughout the different hadith collections.

Where multiple trustworthy hadiths agree, Sunni Muslims will take this as binding. In other words, people today are kicked out of Islam, or even killed based on the hadiths.

Pictures of Muhammad are "not exactly" forbidden in the hadiths either. The hadiths do not single out Muhammad’s picture. Rather, in the hadith we find the prohibition of all pictures of people or animals, which would include pictures from a camera.

For example, Sahih Muslim vol.3 no.5268 (p.1160) says, "Ibn ‘Umar reported Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) having said: Those who paint pictures would be punished on the Day of Resurrection and it would be said to them: Breathe soul into what you have created.2519"

Notice that the prohibition was not just against idolators who made pictures, or even Muslims who made pictures for other reasons, but for anyone who made pictures.

Sahih Muslim vol.3 no.5271 (p.1161) gives a little more detail: "This hadith has been reported on the authority of Abu Mu’awiya though another chain of transmitters (and the words are): ‘Verily the most grievously tormented people amongst the denizens of Hell on the Day of Resurrection would be the painters of pictures.2520..."

"Narrated ‘Aisha: Allah’s Apostle said, ‘The painter of these pictures will be punished on the Day of Resurrection, and it will be said to them, Make alive what you have created.’" Bukhari vol.9 book 93 no.646 p.487. no.647 p.487 is the same except it is narrated by Ibn ‘Umar.

No pictures of people or animals according to Bukhari vol.4 book 54 no.447-450 p.297-299.

Conclusion: It is clear that the hadiths prohibit pictures of animals or people, especially in homes. There is no focus on pictures of Muhammad per se. All pictures of people and animals are forbidden. It is a completely general prohibition.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #11
21. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
leeroysphitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
16. Getting lessons on the Quran from Ann Coulter is like
trying to learn the basics of jungle combat in South East Asia from Dick Cheney...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
17. "even a real religion can't go bossing around other people like this."
Well she very well may end up with a million dollar reward on her head. Her statements are every bit as inflamitory as those Danish Cartoons. Does she try and be as offensive as possible or does it just come natural?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
18. She isn't the first by any means to state this.
It sounds like Islam doesn't forbid it across the board, however some sects do forbid it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
19. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
22. The irony of issuing decrees and conflating it to Liberals
Hmmm...Seems to me that it's Ann Coulter and her supporters that demand we do whatever it is they decide is the "Right" thing. :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
23. It Goes Back to the Ten Commandments
in the eyes of Muslims: "That shalt not make any graven image..."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC