Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I believe that the main reason Cheney gave his story on Faux

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Road Scholar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 02:12 PM
Original message
I believe that the main reason Cheney gave his story on Faux
is that "Britt" was instructed not to ask who all was in the hunting party. He has since stayed away from the press.
Just saying that the "Swiss Miss" slipped out the back door and that was the plan to cover that up. IMHO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Why would Gregory apologize?
I don't get it. McFellon was being rude and disrespectful to all of the reporters. Gregory had nothing to apologize for....arghh...this is what is wrong with the media and the dems...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Chiyo-chichi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. Give it up.
First of all he didn't say that his wife "told him he had to apologize."

GREGORY: I was frustrated, I said what I said, but I think that you should never speak that way, as my wife reminded me, number one. And number two, I think it created a diversion from some of the serious questions in the story, so I regret that. I was wrong, and I apologize.

Secondly, perhaps he picked NBC because he works for NBC.

Third, what does one thing have to do with the other? Nothing.

Finally, let's see what Mr. Gregory said after his apology...

GREGORY: But I think what—what’s interesting about all of this is that Mary and others in the White House have been eager to stoke this as a false debate between the vice president and the White House press corps, attempting to cast this as the White House press corps is a ping-pong in the culture wars. The reality is that that false debate obscures some real facts. You laid out some of them in terms of questions that were raised about how the vice president initially disclosed this, making the decision to not disclose it himself and have Katharine Armstrong do it.

It also overlooks a very important point, and that is there was disagreement, as Mary well knows, within the White House about how this was handled: the question of why the vice president didn’t call the president. Also the fact that there were some White House advisers who told me this week, it made the president look bad, it raised questions about who was really running the rodeo in the White House.

The vice president created these questions. It’s also emblematic of the rather secretive style with the press by the vice president. And so I think it—it’s fair to disagree with the White House press corps, or with me, or the White House press corps generally, I think, is more important, in terms of how we go about answers. But I, for one, don’t apologize for pushing hard for answers. I think people who view the news or view what I do for a partisan lens may think I was making a political statement. I was not. I make no apologies for pushing hard for information because sometimes it’s hard to get.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike Nelson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. huh?
???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. ??????????????????
What the hell did D. Gregory have to apologize for? Doing his job? McClellan should have apologized to David.

I'm sure MSNBC/NBC folded to an organized Freeper assault...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Huh what?
Gregory has been doing very well with this story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Road Scholar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. You are exactly right. They picked a controlled environment. nt
I just hate to see Cheney get away with that as much as they have self righteously harped on Kennedy and Clinton all these years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. apropos of nothing, I like
Edited on Mon Feb-20-06 02:53 PM by Lerkfish
anchovies.


now back to the topic: "who precisely was he apologizing too (sic)?

Cheney should apologize to Whittington, for one, Cheney's wife, for another (swiss miss instant cocoa), the sheriff's dept for obstructing justice, and the american people for acting as if he is above the law.

I'm just getting started....


The Iraqi people, for starting a naked war of agression based on knowing lies, Plame and Brewster Jennings, for committing treason to out a crucial CIA operation...


want me to go on?


oh, and yeah, welcome to DU
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. glad I got my choice of toppings in quickly.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
obreaslan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. It didn't take too long....
I was watching on another thread. :)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aden_nak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
7. The main reason is that Cheney could write Britt's questions for him.
But yes, the identity of those in the hunting party was a major factor. As was the level of alcohol in the Vice President's bloodstream at the time he pulled the trigger. As was Britt's compliance in simply accepting every answer that Dick Cheney offered, without so much as probing the man for a bit more factual information. I mean, an interview isn't supposed to be an interrogation, but what we saw was a speech, interspersed with the proper queue lines, so it would appear to be a conversation. It was an advertisement, at best.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MnFats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
8. you mean Hume was't a snarling pit bull during that interview?
He didn't make Cheney feel like Daniel in the Lion's Den?
Wow.
My faith is shattered.

"Did you get the bird?'
that was the toughest question I heard....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Road Scholar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. I thought they were going to kiss. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
central scrutinizer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. they were playing footsie under the table
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. Fox was chosen because their audience is the most...
pliable to accepting lies from the Bush Regime.

Mrs. Armstrong was not the eyewitness. The Swiss Ambasador was the actual eyewitness yet no official statement was on record from her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Road Scholar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-20-06 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. My point exactly. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC