Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Party On!", say The Supremes- allow church to use hallucinogenic tea

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 11:25 AM
Original message
"Party On!", say The Supremes- allow church to use hallucinogenic tea
Edited on Tue Feb-21-06 11:26 AM by npincus
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/S/SCOTUS_RELIGIOUS_TEA?SITE=7219&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2006-02-21-10-12-42

...deciding against Bush admin. Interesting.


WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Supreme Court ruled unanimously Tuesday that a small congregation in New Mexico may use hallucinogenic tea as part of a four-hour ritual intended to connect with God.

Justices, in their first religious freedom decision under Chief Justice John Roberts, moved decisively to keep the government out of a church's religious practice. Federal drug agents should have been barred from confiscating the hoasca tea of the Brazil-based church, Roberts wrote in the decision.

The tea, which contains an illegal drug known as DMT, is considered sacred to members of O Centro Espirita Beneficiente Uniao do Vegetal, which has a blend of Christian beliefs and South American traditions. Members believe they can understand God only by drinking the tea, which is consumed twice a month at four-hour ceremonies.

<snip>


The Bush administration had argued that the drug in the tea not only violates a federal narcotics law, but a treaty in which the United States promised to block the importation of drugs including dimethyltryptamine, also known as DMT.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. A. That's not the headline that comes with the article
Edited on Tue Feb-21-06 11:31 AM by alcibiades_mystery
B. Use of ayahuasca tea is not a "party," and connecting the practice with Bill & Tedesque stonerism is part of the very problem that got this stupid fucking prosecution to the Supreme Court to begin with.

on edit: sorry about A! Thought this was in LBN!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
2. To be consistent, Supremes will have to OK marijuana for Rastifarians next
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC