Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clarify something for me please re: "running" a port

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Seen the light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 02:07 PM
Original message
Clarify something for me please re: "running" a port
What does that entail exactly? Every article or editorial I've read about the UAE port deal has made reference to this company "running" the ports, but doesn't outline in detail what that means. What exactly would they get control of?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ron Mexico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. delete
Edited on Tue Feb-21-06 02:12 PM by Ron Mexico
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. Everything!!!
They direct the movement of ships, the offloading of cargo, oversee the security at the port (with help from other agencies), the cranes, the ramps, inspection of containers (with help from designated agencies), manage staffing, the whole nine yards. They would also be responsible for maintaining and upgrading technology to make the ports more efficient, as well as maintenance of infrastructure (dredging harbors, maintaining seawalls, berths and anchorages, as well as buildings, warehouses, and piers). It's a bigass job...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FSogol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Nah, it means they take 10-15% off the top and contract
the operation out to a subcontractor who is most likely an American firm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Sure, they could, but they retain responsibility and ultimate control
And I don't know much about this company--it could be that they want to install systems that are compatible with their operations at other locations, and perhaps are more automated than the methodologies currently in use.

It is unlikely at this early stage that ANYTHING will change--the new management company will simply assume the existing contracts that are already in place. It's what happens down the road, as technologies evolve and improve, that will make this ownership shift "interesting."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC