Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

McClellan Indicates Admin. Won’t Cooperate With Congressional Hearings

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-04-06 10:51 AM
Original message
McClellan Indicates Admin. Won’t Cooperate With Congressional Hearings
http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/03/wh-wont-cooperate/

McClellan Indicates Administration Won’t Cooperate With Congressional Hearings On Domestic Spying

Sen. Arlen Specter (R-PA), the chairman of the Senate judiciary committee, has pledged to hold congressional hearings on Bush’s warrantless domestic spying program. At today’s press briefing, Scott McClellan made it pretty clear that administration officials wouldn’t cooperate:

Q And my question is, does the White House take this into account, will it try to talk to them, will it participate in the hearings?

MR. McCLELLAN: Like I said, and the President has said we’ve briefed members of Congress on more than a dozen occasions.

Q But that’s not what they’re talking about.

MR. McCLELLAN: And in terms of discussions about this, the President talked about this at his end-of-the-year news conference. We shouldn’t be talking about intelligence activities, particularly in a time of war, in a public way. This is a highly classified authorization –

Q Not anymore. I mean, it’s public now.

MR. McCLELLAN: No, it still is. It still is highly classified. The President has talked in a very limited way about the nature of this authorization and what it’s designed to do, and how it’s limited. And so we will continue to talk with members of Congress —

Q Will you cooperate with a congressional hearing?

MR. McCLELLAN: — the Attorney General has been talking to additional members of Congress about this authorization, so that they do understand why this tool is so vital in our efforts to prevail in the global war on terrorism.

Q But will you cooperate with a hearing?

MR. McCLELLAN: Well, I’m not going to get into talking about ruling things in or out from this podium. We’ll talk with members of Congress and make sure that they’re briefed and kept informed, as we have been.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-04-06 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. So, in other words
They'll be blackmailing members of Congress with the info they've got on them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-04-06 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Great minds! (see below)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-04-06 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. LOL! All at 9:53!!!
The NSA stuff sort of makes you wonder what info Voinovich was presented with regarding John Bolten. It must have been powerful to move the man to tears BEGGING that he not be confirmed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-04-06 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. ExactaMUNDO! Bingo! Ding! Ding! Ding!
Exactly right. That's what he's saying.:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-04-06 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. yep
the 'Rovian' approach
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-04-06 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
2. I bet the briefings go something like: "STFU, or we'll ruin you with the
stuff we have gathered by illegally spying on you!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ToolTex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-04-06 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
4. Time to ask if the WH will cooperate with impeachment hearings.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-04-06 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
7. Add it to the list: Abu Ghraib, investigation in lead-up to war, etc.
And how do we make them accountable?:-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-04-06 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. We can't "make them accountable", because they aren't
accountable. The Leader is above the Law. This is the new America - get used to it. The lackeys and lickspitals in Congress should be grateful that the Leader is only using blackmail on them; he could, of course, have them executed - and their families, too...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-04-06 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
9. The WH SPOKESman, says "I'm not going to get into talking"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rustydog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-04-06 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
10. Bush must have been a mason at one time...He puts up so
many stonewalls it is amazing.
Can't we impeach him for failing to get a building permit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC