Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BUSH SAYS HE WOULD VETO LEGISLATION TO STOP DUBAI PORT DEAL

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 03:41 PM
Original message
BUSH SAYS HE WOULD VETO LEGISLATION TO STOP DUBAI PORT DEAL
Edited on Tue Feb-21-06 03:47 PM by kpete
BUSH SAYS HE WOULD VETO LEGISLATION TO STOP DUBAI PORT DEAL
21 Feb 2006 20:28:30 GMT

Source: Reuters

BUSH SAYS HE WOULD VETO LEGISLATION TO STOP DUBAI PORT DEAL

http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/WBT004834.htm


(Kpete: thats all it says for now...I will update when possible)

Update:

ABOARD AIR FORCE ONE, Feb 21 (Reuters) - President George W. Bush said on Tuesday that a deal for a state-owned Dubai company to manage major U.S. ports should go forward and will not jeopardize U.S. security.

Bush told reporters traveling back to Washington with him from Colorado that he would veto legislation to stop the deal from going through.

"After careful review by our government, I believe the transaction ought to go forward," Bush said. He added that if the U.S. Congress passed a law to stop the deal, "I'll deal with it with a veto."

http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/WBT004834.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
stop the bleeding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. yep I just read it on Reuters - didn't take you long, * just doesn't get
it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack from Charlotte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
46. Who will be the 1st Senator to say, "BRING....IT.....ON?".....
I'm pretty sure AWOL/moron's veto will be over ridden in this electiopn year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. IMPEACH this MORON!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
converted_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. So, what's the deal here.. Why would he lay down the law on some-
Edited on Tue Feb-21-06 03:44 PM by converted_democrat
thing that sooo many in this country are pissed off about?? Why is this such a big deal to him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nonconformist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Makes you wonder, doesn't it? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catmandu57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Money Money Money
and lots of it. Go ahead on chimpy* we'll see who wins this fight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SmokingJacket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
43. It must be part of a deal he made ...
Everything Bush does is part of an exchange -- either a reward or a punishment to someone. Someone in the UAE is doing or has done something for him (maybe kept quiet? I dunno) and this is part of the payoff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. There are Arkansans ready to lock and load
over this. The techs here at the office are really ticked off over this. I haven't heard anyone here defend it-in fact what I've been hearing are comments about how the Second Amendment is our friend.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
42. bwah hah hah hah!
That is awesome! Go Bush! Bring it on!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AbbyR Donating Member (734 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
48. Where in Arkansas?
I'm in Southeast Arkansas, and I haven't heard a word from any of my usual repuke "pen pals."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blue cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 05:08 PM
Original message
Time to send them a little hello.... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blue cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #48
55. Time to send them a little hello.... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #48
59. Northwest Arkansas
where the hippies, rednecks, back to landers, survivialists, and folks who just want to be left alone or who are just plain nuts all congregate!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nutmegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
7. This would be his first veto
Edited on Tue Feb-21-06 04:26 PM by Nutmegger
Image vetoing this as his first!

:puke:!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #7
41. It would lead us right into the November elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raksha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #41
47. You make an excellent point.
I didn't even think of that. Maybe NOW people will be willing to listen to us on the subject of election fraud!

Or, on second thought, were you referring to next November, not November 2004? It seems to work either way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Don Claybrook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
8. This COWARD has never vetoed a single thing
So yeah, go ahead, dipshit, veto this one if it gets to your desk. What's the polling running now, about 90% against this sale?

An overturned veto would be worth its own margarita celebration.

Get your pen ready, dimwit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
9. check between his legs
I think I see ball clamps
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
file83 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
10. BUSH does a double-back-flip, half-gainer, triple-axle,Cover-His-Ass dive.
He better VETO this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
file83 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. Wait a minute - I was confused. I thought it said he would try and stop
the deal. Now I understand - he would VETO any legislation that attempts to block the deal. OMG.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
11. OH GOOD! His first veto! Let this be his FIRST over-ridden veto too!
Actually, that would be really funny! 5 1/2 years, and Shrub signs his FIRST veto, and Congress over-rides it!!!! HA HA AHA HA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
12. Just called my conman
I told the aide that Con. Boozman (AR-Repuke) that he should either stop this or start impeachment proceedings. I bet when this gets around I could start a petition in this reddest of red towns and get a ton of signatures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AbbyR Donating Member (734 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #12
49. Email it to me...I'll sign
Ross is my rep - and he's another republican in a blue suit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DearAbby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
13. I hope this may cook his goose.
he has used the TERROR CARD for 5 yrs, now cries because it worked? American people are really concerned about this, for good reason. These people have/had connections to terrorists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
14. EXCELLENT!
:popcorn: This is gonna get interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nonconformist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
15. Outrageous. IMPEACH NOW!
It should be crystal clear to everyone now that Bush does NOT care about the security of America and does NOT care about the will of the people. It's all about money, bottom line. IMPEACH NOW!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Daphne08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
16. Something just doesn't smell right about this port deal, but I
must admit, I haven't a clue as to what it could be... just a feeling.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Halliburton?
They HAVE to be involved in here somewhere, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Daphne08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. I don't know, but I would be willing to bet it has something to do
with money.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nonconformist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. Another attack would make it easier for them to go into Iran.
Just sayin'... :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #20
51. The TIMING of this is just perfect for a MIHOP and a new excuse
to attack Iran.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RazzleDazzle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #16
25. THere are several benefits to all his richest friends (and family)
I'll bet the answer, or fuller picture, you seek can be found somewhere in here:

Who the hell cares what YOU think?
(good compilation with links)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x474465

Ask yourself: Why is Bush so damned determined to keep the port deal?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=364&topic_id=482138&mesg_id=482138

UAE corp. exec. to be U.S. DOT Administrator. (Jan. 06)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x472586

Edward Copeland (52 posts) Mon Feb-20-06 03:50 PM
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=2471299&mesg_id=2471307
1. This thing is smelling worse all the time
On top of the bipartisan criticism of this plan, including Tom Ridge, a poster on my blog tipped me off to this angle: a key executive of the UAE company was appointed by Dubya in January to a key transportation department post overseeing maritime issues and serving under Norman Mineta.

Here is the link to the company's own press release:

http://www.dpiterminals.com/fullnews.asp?NewsID=39




Port security should have been an issue before Bush decided to sell it
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=2471299&mesg_id=2471299
Link:
Key lawmaker says U.S. should freeze port deal
http://www.contracostatimes.com/mld/centredaily/news/local/13914905.htm?source=rss&channel=centredaily_local

the connection to it all - Carlyle Group involved in port security deal
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x2471320#2471323
also: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x473813
and: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x474295
Link: http://www.bridgedeck.org/mmp_news_archive/2002/mmp_news021219.html
and: http://www.nsnet.com/archive-1-2005-02.html
and: http://www.informare.it/news/review/2003/b030303.asp


Our Ports are a Tradeoff!! All about $$$ and Oil
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x471124
Link: http://www.oilandgasnewsonline.com/bkArticlesF.asp?Article=14878&Section=1947&IssueID=336 (also other links in OP)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
21. Oh, I can see it now
Congress passes bill, Shrub vetoes it, Congress overrides veto because of overwhelming support.

Shrub's poll numbers tank even futher.

Hannity starts talking impeachment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
22. Then maybe some of those port-side Repub better start thinking IMPEACHMENT
It's about time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
m_welby Donating Member (508 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
23. doesn't everyone know a veto from this fool is an empty threat
I don't think he even knows how to veto a bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bumblebee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
24. They will have more than enough votes to override...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
26. Threaten Veto for $ and torture, oh my!


So now we now what the really IMPORTANT issues to this WH are:

1. Selling out our security for profit

2. Torture
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
centristo Donating Member (500 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
27. FReepers beginning to realize Bush is a Moran
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1582953/posts

...and hilarity ensues. :toast: :party: :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. He is dead now - we FINALLY got the goods
"He won't veto a ham sandwich, but will veto a deal to let a potential terrorist country watch our ports? Great war on terror this is!"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. Some choice ones
Edited on Tue Feb-21-06 04:11 PM by missb
To: Jeremiah2911
We should trust Bush. He knows what he's doing.



5 posted on 02/21/2006 12:58:32 PM PST by StephenFrancis
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies >

To: Jeremiah2911
He won't veto a ham sandwich, but will veto a deal to let a potential terrorist country watch our ports? Great war on terror this is!



6 posted on 02/21/2006 12:58:47 PM PST by Bommer (Have you insulted a prophet today? )
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies >

To: Jeremiah2911
Amazing. The one time George would use the veto is to give his conservative base the finger. He wouldn't veto McCain-Feingold. He wouldn't veto a staggering pile of pork-barrel projects. But he'll veto those who would hold him to his "Fight any nation or regime who supports or harbors terrorists." rhetoric.
I'm aghast.


7 posted on 02/21/2006 12:59:10 PM PST by TChris ("Unless you act, you're going to lose your world." - Mark Steyn)
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies >
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. Another true believer.
To: Bommer
Bush wouldn't do this unless it was good for America.



13 posted on 02/21/2006 1:00:13 PM PST by StephenFrancis
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies >
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #31
37. One of them swearing that Bush is the anti-christ.
:rofl:

To: StephenFrancis
We should trust Bush. He knows what he's doing.

Like trusting him about securing the border when there's 14 million illegals and more coming in every day? I voted for him 4 times, but I swear there must be 6's on his head.


31 posted on 02/21/2006 1:04:06 PM PST by mtbopfuyn (Legality does not dictate morality... Lavin)
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies >
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. The Idiot Would Vote for Him Again Too
I'm sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
centristo Donating Member (500 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #31
40. bush is infallible
much like the pope.

:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
centristo Donating Member (500 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #27
38. i found some more
damn, some of these people are SO FUCKING BLIND AND GULLIBLE IT MAKES ME SICK!!!!!

To: antaresequity

I think maybe we need to ask what he knows that we don't know.

I am on record against this. But who the heck am I and what do I know about this on anything other than an appearance level?

Nothing.

So my next question is—here is a guy whose every waking breath is spent in protecting the American people within the confines of the law and practical application...and he is absolutely intent on making this happen.

Why?

It would be an easy enough thing to back off on. He believes in this. There has to be a reason, something broader that is not known.

90 posted on 02/21/2006 12:42:05 PM PST by pollyannaish
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies >

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1582942/replies?c=2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
28. NOTHING will stop the Great Weasel from Funneling taxpayer money to...
...his business CRONIES.

NOTHING. DAMN our national security! Full speed ahead!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
32. This might be the first VETO override of Chimpy.
Even die hard pukes are having a hard time swallowing this BS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #32
36. Chimpy's First Veto Actually
If in fact it actually gets to that point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
33. I knew I smelled Halliburton - from a Freeper:
"Its the old Statue of Liberty play. Bush fakes to the UAE, dems and pubs revolt and demand Halliburton gets the deal, then Bush caves in despair and gives it to Halliburton."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
34. Is BushCo planning to smuggle in something? Is that why they're...
defending this deal to the death? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
35. MIHOP?
What frightens me is the possibility that this could lead to a MIHOP. They would sure as hell have an easy way in
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
44. Follow the money. Someone has to, it should lead to the answer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
45. Our Manchurian Candidate regime
Any doubts left as to the loyalty of anyone who was maneuvered into absolute power over a nation they are hellbent on destroying.

What do the illustrious PNAC dolts think of this, those cheerleaders of "American" Empire. I always thought they too were dunces for not seeing it as a private enterprise empire with no concern at all for any real American interests as such by any definition or from any ideological point of view.

Impeachment is not enough. Prison would be a mercy they themselves would not grant to the least of their
dissenting opposition. We can hang them or go hang ourselves because continued obeisance to the pseudo royal presidency will condemn needlessly countless innocent lives here and abroad for the private power and profit of usurpers of every power, party, and idea that exists in this nation or in the world of decent civilization.

Not to face these things head-on, to consider this mildly accountable proposition in face of open heinous crimes is to insure war in Iran, Korea, everywhere and enormous fatalities in all future world crises of any sort as civilization is pulled down by those who will not give up power so easily surrendered to them .

The volume of our cries must overmatch the future cries of the wounded, the plague-ridden, the starving and the imprisoned whose backward echos even now are not too late to silence by speaking the truth and changing the tragic scene.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
50. FOLLOW THE MONEY
$$$$$$ $$$$$$$ $$$$$$$$ $$$$$$$
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
52. So, NOW He Figures Out How The Veto Works?
Idiot! He draws the line in the sand now that Congress is united against him? Boy, talk about not getting it.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #52
54. Just confirms that he isn't that bright.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
53. HE'S FINISHED!!! If he vetoes the stop Dubai Port control legislation,
that may just push Congress, REPUBLICANS and DEMOCRATS, to IMPEACH his arrogant ass! LET HIM VETO IT! I DARE HIM!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
56. No veto by Bush, just a "signing statement" with his "understanding"
Special thanks to Justice ScALITO for the Presidential "Signing Statement" invention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0rganism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
57. Three words: BRING IT ON
Even Karl Rove will have a hard time getting this turd to blossom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
missouri dem 2 Donating Member (308 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
58. Mush as I would love to see him commit hari kari I am sure that
w* will flip flop on the issue very soon.
You don't need to be a weather man to see which way the wind blows on this issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niallmac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
60. * sees self as CEO of CORP WORLD. No sense of leading 'The People.'n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC