Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is Bush just tossing the Republicans a bone on this port deal?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 05:08 PM
Original message
Is Bush just tossing the Republicans a bone on this port deal?
Something in my gut tells me this is just too convenient an issue for the GOP. Bush is a popular target, Rove knows it, everyone knows it now. They won't be able to do much about it before the 2006 "election," so Bush is tossing all the incumbents a way to "stand up to George Bush, the most powerful awesome president in the history of civilization!" Or something to that effect. The GOP is getting all the attention for stopping the port sale, but that is to be understood. It's not a story when a dem protests something Bush does, but when the republicans themselves line up against him, that certainly is news.

But is it real?

I think, as usual, BushCo will get exactly what it wants in the end. Exactly what it wants. Bush will find a way to sell the ports, or assign them over in exchange for some beads and Sammy Sosa, using Executive Order or something. Cheney will speak up from his hidden lair and declare that he has reviewed the deal with Alberto Gonzalez and that we can all just go fuck ourselves.

But it will go through. And all the GOP turds who've been swirling around the drain with Bush will get a second chance, a tried and true campaign commercial, Joe Republican, Standing Up To George Bush to Defend Our Ports! Just like even the dems! Really, see republicans aren't so bad!

I don't know...maybe I've just grown too cynical, but I think there is too much money at stake here for BushCo to let some flunky camera-whore congressman trip 'em up! This is all just a bit too suspicious, if you ask me. Which you didn't, of course. But still...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. You make a good point.
Edited on Tue Feb-21-06 05:13 PM by formercia
have you been talking to KKKRove?

Just too convenient when Hastert and Frist jump into the fray,,,loyal as the are...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daveskilt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. and then those brave repubs keep their seats and ....
bush does NOT get impeached. they will vote to override a veto they wont vote to impeach. bush never did a thing in his life that wasnt in his own self interest. This is no diferent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guy Whitey Corngood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. Hmmmm. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yes, dear. It's just one more clever trick.
Because they're sooooooooooooo much smarter than we are and they never never never make a mistake.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackbourassa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. These guys aren't that smart
Bush is living in fantasy land at this point. He's surrounded himself by "yes men" and can't understand what the fuss is all about.

This may kill the pukes in the upcoming elections. Not save them.

The whole premise of your argument is wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. no
This is no different than their fluck-ups on many other issues. It is only that both spineless sides of congress are pissed this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
6. PREDICTION: "We" will end up BEGGING Halliburton to take them overq
and pay for it bigtime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warrens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
7. You think Bush is capable of being told he's wrong?
We're talking about a sociopath here. If he keeps it up, every word of support those clowns ever said about him, every bogus bill they ever voted for, every vote they swapped for earmark cash is going to come crashing down on them. Their little punk in disgrace is a lot more dangerous to them than some fake "we stood up to him" stance will help.

Personally, I think this is a fairly minor issue; just take away all day to day authority from Dubai, like being able to hire or fire. But it's just so amazingly stupid to try to DEFEND it. The Smirklings must have a major pipeline full of cash coming from Dubai, and to cancel the deal might cut it off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
debbierlus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. I agree - this is horrible for the Republicans

All around. This is a wake-up call exposing them for what they are -

I don't think this is a strategy. I really don't.

It is corrupt power over-reaching.

I think it is that simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
8. I just blogged about that very possibility...
Then I added some more plausible reasons why the BushCo/ Carlyle Cabal would
force this Dubai port deal through.

The link is in my sigline.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
debbierlus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
9. I don't think so and here is why:

This isn't a Rovian move. This is ALL about money. Bush is a PUPPET. He has NO choice. This isn't a political move. It is a financial one. Bush is doing what his rulers demand. He is backed into a corner. This has CHENEY not Rove written all over it.

This deal has the power to turn the country completely against Bush & call for his azz on a platter. Impeachment becomes a viable option.

Rove didn't plan this -

Rove is a Bush ALLIE. He puts Bush above Congress. Look at his record.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
12. No. I think this was an "in-house" deal, from the get go.
Don't think the White House is playing Congressional politics here, at all.

Sounds like a cabinet level arrangement, from the tender for approval to the committee review to the final agreement. (Note the recent appointment to the Maritime Undersecretary position.)

I honestly think Bushco thought it'd fly under the radar and they'd "take care" of Congressional rumblings on the side.

Bush's veto challenge is something we may see more of in the year(s) to come as the Administration asserts its "exemption" from any and all oversight.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Twist_U_Up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
13. When you see Peter King on TV
Championing the cause against bushco you know somethings up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC