Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is Bush's strong support for the UAE take-over of American ports related..

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
FormerRepublican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 05:50 PM
Original message
Is Bush's strong support for the UAE take-over of American ports related..
...to the old BCCI scandal?

I found this interesting info:

"There was no relationship more central to BCCI's existence from its inception than that between BCCI and Sheikh Zayed and the ruling family of Abu Dhabi.

Abu Dhabi was present at BCCI's creation as one of two providers of BCCI's capital. It was BCCI's largest depositor, and its largest borrower, and for most of BCCI's existence, its largest shareholder. The relationship between the two entities was, as Price Waterhouse told the Bank of England days before BCCI's closure, "very close," with BCCI providing services to the ruling family of Abu Dhabi far beyond the ordinary relationship of a bank to either its shareholders or depositors.(1)

There are numerous examples of the centrality of the Abu Dhabi relationship to BCCI, and its unusual nature.

In 1972, when BCCI was created, Abu Dhabi shareholders purchased 20 percent of its stock with an investment of $500,000, and then generously agreed to have that interest drop to just over one percent of BCCI just three years later."

http://www.fas.org/irp/congress/1992_rpt/bcci/14abudhabi.htm

This whole deal stinks to high heaven.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. I don't really understand that...but I do know that ANYTHING bush*
wants to do STINKS TO HIGH HEAVEN and is rotten to the core and someone he knows will benefit financially. That's a fact!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FormerRepublican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Simple - payback for $$$ loses. Recall that Bush Sr was involved...
...as was the CIA. BCCI absolutely reeked, and Bush was neck deep in it. I found it interesting that the UAE was neck deep as well. It looks suspicious on it's face.

Alternately, the port deal could be BCCI #2 - another way to launder $$$, drugs, illegal stuff, etc. for Bush and his UAE cronies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. smells ever so sweet to me.
all they had was national security. and they just fucked it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiFascist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. From the "Forbidden Truth"....

...America's support for Bin Ladin was in large part an involuntary consequence of its own ambitions in the region <with respect to the Soviet Union>. Saudi Arabia's support, on the other hand, was a calculated policy, clear and unambiguous, concerning its brand of Islam in the world. In light of these revelations, Osama bin Laden appears, above all, to be a product of Wahhabism and instrument of the Saudi kingdom. And both contained converging elements that linked them permanently.

<snip>

Osama bin Laden is only an emblematic figure in the major religious and financial issues and interests that underlie the future of even the Saudi regime. The networks that support him are well established--whether the BCCI, the Islamic banks, or the so-called humanitarian organizations--and it is quite unlikely that they will disappear with bin Laden.

The real issue now, and depends on our capacity to call into question Saudi Arabia's political and financial support of the world's fundamentalist movements.


So is it really wise to allow Saudi Arabia and the UAE, with its close financial ties to SA, to establish globalist monopolies? Isn't this the potential start of the Islamo-fascism we have been warned about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cosmicdot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. good question
Harken Energy-BCCI connected?

the Octopus rears its ugly ahead again

Yes, there were BCCI Senate investigations ... but, did anyone big get busted?

The criminals are still at large and in action.


I suspect there are a couple of individuals scurrying around in the background who could shed some insight on matters ...

Jackson Stephens (Mr. Acxiom data miner, Arkansas good ol'boy ...probably the biggest contributor to Sen. Blanche Lincoln...is it a wonder she's such a disappointment in dealing with the BFEE?) ...

Pug Winokur ... where's he at? Former Enron and Harvard Management Corporation director ... and Dyncorp director ... surely he may have some BCCI info and the Harken Energy deal ...
http://www.onlinejournal.com/archive/02-17-02_Chin.pdf

James Bath who was used to funnel money from Osama bin Laden's brother, Salem bin Laden (dead, you know-another coincidental plane 'accident'), to set up George W. Bush in the oil business

http://www.buzzflash.com/perspectives/bush_harken.html
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0210/S00178.htm


Makes Rep. McKinney's comment about the country being run by a crime syndicate more apropos.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC