Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If Homeland Security had been doing the job of protecting the US

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
xiamiam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 09:55 AM
Original message
If Homeland Security had been doing the job of protecting the US
the issue of the operations of our ports would have been addressed long ago. I think the outrage among the average American, is that we thought(assumed) that safeguards were in place to insure safety....once again, incompetence rules and we learn that not only have the operations of the ports been overlooked, they are for sale to a foreign government...what exactly has Homeland Security been doing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. This is exactly the point that Kerry made many times during the campaign.
Media ignored the issue completely, even though Gary Hart was speaking out on the issue for Kerry. The media couldn't have indepth discussions with Hart because it might look too bad for the Bushboy's image as a terrorist-fighter.

After all, it was the HartRudman Report on Global Terror that Bush refused to read when it was handed to him on Jan 30, 2001. Gary Hart knows EXACTLY how full of shit BushInc is on the terror issue and homeland security.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sui generis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
2. they have perfect 20/20 hindsight
which makes them no more competent to BE Department of Vaterland Security than the average joe shmoe.

Hey - those other morons voted for this, they have only themselves to blame.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
converted_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
3. Self delete..
Edited on Wed Feb-22-06 10:22 AM by converted_democrat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cosmik debris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
4. Elephant repellent joke
Remember the old elephant repellent joke?
#1: "You want to buy some elephant repellent?"
#2: "But there are no elephants around here!"
#1: "That just proves that it is working!"

That's the Homeland Security argument in a nutshell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
5. I was surprised to find out that our ports were owned by a
British company. I guess I had always assumed that they were owned by American companies. I fail to see that this sale to the UAE can be a good idea for our country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xiamiam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. right..and if they werent before..we had looked into ways to correct
the situation after 911...i think that is what most of us assumed (operative word here)...but I heard Boxer last evening on Scarborough saying that this administration had blocked every effort to address the port security...and i think that most of us are surprised...especially given assurances at the heckuva job * and his team of crooks are doing..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC