soothsayer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 12:28 PM
Original message |
Heads up:Scotty WH Daily Briefing scheduled for 1:15 pm EDT |
rustydog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 12:29 PM
Response to Original message |
1. I would love to hear a reporter ask Scotty: |
|
Since you are now quoting polls as the will of Americans wishes, what is Bush's thoughts of over 60 percent of americans calling for his impeachment over the spying issue?
|
ncrainbowgrrl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
elehhhhna
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 12:38 PM
Response to Original message |
Sydnie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 12:44 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Please take notes for me |
|
I have to leave for work and can't stay for this one. sorry I will miss out on the daily squirm!
|
stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 12:46 PM
Response to Original message |
5. waiting and ready..... |
Spazito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:04 PM
Response to Original message |
6. I am learning to love watching Snotty Scottie dance, weave |
|
and bob, I guess I need a life, rofl!
|
carolinalady
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:11 PM
Response to Original message |
7. bet the mining co ceo holds his press conference at the same |
|
time. Msm has been waiting on that one for over 2 hours. Scottie's must be pretty good today.
|
carolinalady
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
8. no link to listen on wh page n/t |
chat_noir
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:13 PM
Response to Original message |
9. kick - in the hopes that we don't have 3 threads on it |
soothsayer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
13. whoops, we've got two! if you count this one, and this one: |
BR_Parkway
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:22 PM
Response to Original message |
10. Is CSpan going to broadcast? Im home today with no soundcard |
hang a left
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:23 PM
Response to Original message |
11. Is it going to be on cspan??? |
CabalPowered
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
12. According to the schedule, yes on CSPAN 1 |
|
But not live yet at the WH
|
hang a left
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
Spazito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:29 PM
Response to Original message |
15. Geez, has Snotty EVER been on time??? |
|
He is always at least 15 minutes late!
Ahhh, as usual, he is on time if 15 minutes late is 'on time'.
|
karlrschneider
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:29 PM
Response to Original message |
soothsayer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:29 PM
Response to Original message |
17. It's on! On cspan tv! Helen asking about the dropping of a bomb |
|
on a home killing a family with children.
|
w8liftinglady
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
20. lol...you post,I'll embellish ;) |
w8liftinglady
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
24. His face turned visably redder w/Abramoff questions. |
soothsayer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
21. A. the military goes out of the way to avoid civilian casualties. It's |
|
being looked into.
Q. how can you justify killing children?
A. Look what happened in iraq last month. An eleection, democracy. I object to your characterization of the military this way. blah
|
w8liftinglady
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:29 PM
Response to Original message |
18. Helen Thomas asking about bomb dropped in Iraq today |
hang a left
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
19. Scotty already getting hot under the collar |
chat_noir
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
Skidmore
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:31 PM
Response to Original message |
23. Scottie's thinks yelling something means that it makes a lie |
|
more truthful, just like his boss. Ever notice the bigger the lie, the higher the decibels with this bunch.
|
w8liftinglady
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #23 |
26. what a bunch of double-speak |
w8liftinglady
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #26 |
31. DOESN'T RECALL MEETING HIM????? |
hang a left
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:33 PM
Response to Original message |
25. Raised 100,000 raised for Bush campaign |
hang a left
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #25 |
29. Did ** ever meet Abramoff. |
soothsayer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:34 PM
Response to Original message |
27. Q. In light of abramhoff, what's the WH doing in terms of lobbying |
|
reform?
A. Lobbying reform? Abramhoff is going to be punished, pleaded guilty, lets let the investigation proceed.
Q. Is the prez worried there's a culture of political favors?
A. I don't htink you can characterize it based on this, we don't have all the info, etc.
Q. Abramhoff gave * 100k, you're only giving back 6k, what's the deal?
A. might want to talk to the RNC about that.
Q. So he's not giving back the rest?
A. If you're saying there's other wrongdoing, maybe you should tell me or tell the RNC
|
chat_noir
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:34 PM
Response to Original message |
28. why only $6,000 of $100,000 given back by bush not answered |
SillyGoose
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:34 PM
Response to Original message |
30. This effing Scottie pisses me off when he continually interrupts |
|
when they are asking questions. Its damn rude.
:mad:
|
annabanana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:35 PM
Response to Original message |
32. pres doesn't remember meeting Abram.. |
myrna minx
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #32 |
37. Just like Kenny-boy Lay was an Ann Richards supporter. |
annabanana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:35 PM
Response to Original message |
33. "certainly doesn't know him" |
soothsayer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:35 PM
Response to Original message |
34. Q. so A is a "Pioneer"---are you sure * hasn't met him? |
|
A. He doesn't recall meeting him.
Q. Since you take photos, do you maybe have one?
A. I haven't thought about that. I'll take it into considerartion.
|
Moochy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #34 |
40. and a little smirk too |
|
he was annoyed by that second question, for sure.. his mouth curled up on the right.
|
hang a left
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:35 PM
Response to Original message |
Skidmore
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #35 |
41. That guy was good! He raised a good question and |
|
Scottie danced. Is lobbying legalized bribery?
|
annabanana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:36 PM
Response to Original message |
36. it's a wonder Spinning Scotty doesn't fall over... |
annabanana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:36 PM
Original message |
I wish someone would ask about confl of int re Fisher... |
hang a left
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:36 PM
Response to Original message |
38. Scotty: bla bla bla bla bla |
soothsayer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:37 PM
Response to Original message |
39. Q. (Indian guy) So would you call lobbying legal corruption? |
|
A. Well there are laws in place
Q. So do you think Osama Bin Laden
A. Who?
Q. Osama Bin Laden, do you think he's in pakistan or iraq or where
A. If we knew where he was, we'd bring him to justice.
|
Norquist Nemesis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #39 |
|
Q. So do you think Osama Bin Laden
A. Who?
:rofl:
|
soothsayer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #42 |
44. That killed me! Hope it makes the Daily Show! |
myrna minx
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #44 |
51. I thought of Homer Simpson: |
|
Instead of oooohhh Side SHOW Bob...its ohhhh Osama BIN Laden.
Who? Gawd. That was probably the most honest utterance from that podium in a loooong while.
|
Spazito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:38 PM
Response to Original message |
43. Snotty is giving new definition to the term 'whirling dervish' |
|
as defined as 'an accident waiting to happen'. Spinning is an understatement, lol.
|
soothsayer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #43 |
45. He's more of a whining Dervish |
Spazito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #45 |
|
I will use that descriptor from now on!
|
hatrack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:48 PM
Original message |
I was thinking "whirling turdish" |
|
But that's just my opinion . . . :evilgrin:
|
Spazito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:53 PM
Response to Original message |
83. LOL, I like that one too! Damn... |
|
now I am as confused as Snotty!
|
annabanana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:40 PM
Response to Original message |
46. softball re mining disaster... |
annabanana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #46 |
Norquist Nemesis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #46 |
49. Was that Les? Did he call for a prayer, too? n/t |
soothsayer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:41 PM
Response to Original message |
50. Miner questions. Our hearts and prayers go out ot the families |
Skidmore
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #50 |
52. Does anyone actually believe these people pray??? |
soothsayer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:42 PM
Response to Original message |
53. Q. miner family members said * sent letters to the CEO of the mines |
|
Is this so and can we learn what he said?
A. First I've heard of this.
|
annabanana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:42 PM
Response to Original message |
|
on the agenda "continues to be a priority"
|
soothsayer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:44 PM
Response to Original message |
55. Q. You said if abramhoff had been to the WH it would only have |
|
been a couple of times including holiday parties. how long will it take you to find out for sure?
A. not long. might have been some staff level meetings.
Q> What about meeting near his ranch?
A. I'll look into that.
|
annabanana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:44 PM
Response to Original message |
|
how long will it take to track down the info about how often he'd been to WH? - not long - did he go to crawford? - i'll check' he used to boast about pioneer status gives access? -absolutely not
|
w8liftinglady
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #56 |
annabanana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:45 PM
Response to Original message |
57. we're doing everyting right - heh |
annabanana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:45 PM
Response to Original message |
58. DEMS GOT MONEY TOO - the press said so.. |
mod mom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #58 |
65. I like how he said "gave money to Democrats and Republicans alike" |
|
Unbelievable! What a LIAR!!!!
|
helderheid
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:45 PM
Response to Original message |
soothsayer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:46 PM
Response to Original message |
61. Q. So abramhoff sez that he was a pionner because it bought him |
|
influence in the WH. Is that the point of the Pioneer program?
A. absolutely not! Money with strings attached doens't make it in the door
Q. So is he going to give back the $100k?
A. If you have information that money was illegal you should bring it up to the RNC
|
annabanana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:46 PM
Response to Original message |
62. is there an internal review? |
Spazito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:47 PM
Response to Original message |
63. Love it, the media isn't letting him off the hook re Abramoff and |
|
bush but I wish they would also call him on the 'equally dem and repub' crap.
|
annabanana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:47 PM
Response to Original message |
64. any reiteration of ethical guidlines? |
|
"alway have always will" bs
|
underpants
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:47 PM
Response to Original message |
66. "Administration has always stressed adherence to high ethical standards" |
|
oh did you know that press reports have pointed out that Dems took money from Abramoff and/or his clients too?
|
Norquist Nemesis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #66 |
73. Sure! That's why the Prez ordered ethics refresher classes! |
carolinalady
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:47 PM
Response to Original message |
67. q: why would he be involved in staff meetings? |
|
a: checking into that but as you know we don't discuss staff meetings here.
|
soothsayer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:48 PM
Response to Original message |
68. Q. Any update on the patriot act? RE: the eavesdropping, we're |
|
hearing that it may have taken place earlier than the authorities allowed
A. Absolutely not, that was a different program under different authorities, blah blah
|
w8liftinglady
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:48 PM
Response to Original message |
69. Oh,hell-Cheney's speaking today,too? |
w8liftinglady
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #69 |
72. DEMOCRATS playing politics with patriot act- |
soothsayer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:49 PM
Response to Original message |
70. Dems are playing politics with this legislation, blah blah blah |
sabra
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:49 PM
Response to Original message |
71. September 11th - Bingo! |
annabanana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:49 PM
Response to Original message |
74. patriot act essential for security - push push renewal |
soothsayer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:50 PM
Response to Original message |
75. Q. what word does the prez get from leadership in both houses |
|
about what's going to happen?
A. a minority of dems delaying this. must act to get this done. house out of session until 1/31, this expires Feb 3, so we must act to get this passed
|
annabanana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:50 PM
Response to Original message |
76. a couple of obstructionist dems |
|
a minority of dems... right
|
Norquist Nemesis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #76 |
79. Must be Hagel and Murkowski! |
|
Because it surely couldn't be Republicans. :sarcasm:
|
chat_noir
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:50 PM
Response to Original message |
77. Dems against Patriot Act because beholden to special interests??? |
|
parroting bush
what special interests, you scmucks?!
|
w8liftinglady
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #77 |
81. so,were craig,hagel,sununu,and murkowski(all reps) |
annabanana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:51 PM
Response to Original message |
|
did wh investigate what he did while he was there at OMB
|
annabanana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:52 PM
Response to Original message |
80. when did pres issue directive for spying? |
soothsayer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:53 PM
Response to Original message |
82. q. can you confirm that the nsa eavesdropping did not begin until |
|
after the executive directive was issued and what date was that?
A. prez has said it was in the weeks after sept 11, and it's involving comms with known al qaeda members and terraist orgs.
Q. in the month of september?
A. in the weeks after. talking about this has harmed our national security (decibels going up again!)
|
annabanana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:53 PM
Response to Original message |
84. scotie stressing how NARROW it is - not answering timing ques. |
|
will not give date to above question
|
soothsayer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:54 PM
Response to Original message |
85. Q. Is it incorrect to say that the NSA had started this before the |
|
exec directive?
A. well, there are other existing authorities in place
SO HOW COME NO ONE ASKS "THEN WHY DID HE NEED A NEW ONE?"
|
Norquist Nemesis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #85 |
87. Someone should ask if Bush thinks Democrats are a threat |
soothsayer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:55 PM
Response to Original message |
86. Q. now that this program is known around the world, has he |
|
decided to scrap it or change it?
A. prez will use every tool necessary blah blah blah
|
Norquist Nemesis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #86 |
88. "Every tool" = More Payola for the Media n/t |
Skidmore
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:57 PM
Response to Original message |
89. Scottie looks like he's got a bad case of |
soothsayer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:58 PM
Response to Original message |
90. Q. it's still not clear to me what are the consequences in the WH |
|
if you violate your ethics guidelines?
A. we look at it case by case and take appropriate action?
Q. what are the appropriate actions? it's been 2 years since valerie plame and
A. you're asking about an ongoing investigation
Q. so why has the prez taken no action against those who have acted unethically?
A. you're wrong. Paula is just trying to grandstand on this issue as she has previously
|
Beelzebud
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:58 PM
Response to Original message |
91. "She just wants to grand-stand on this issue like she always does" |
|
FUCK YOU SCOTT...
What a fucking asshole. I hate this motherfucker so much...
|
otohara
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #91 |
93. Who Was He Referring To? |
soothsayer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #93 |
95. reporter named paula daring to ask about ethics and Plame |
|
Q. what are the appropriate actions? it's been 2 years since valerie plame and
A. you're asking about an ongoing investigation
Q. so why has the prez taken no action against those who have acted unethically?
A. you're wrong. Paula is just trying to grandstand on this issue as she has previously
|
w8liftinglady
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #95 |
98. paula cruickshank Washington Times |
soothsayer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:59 PM
Response to Original message |
stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #92 |
97. I was a "lunch meeting" for work and missed the entire thing |
|
I did browse the thread, was there anything impordant that my librul ass missed besides the Abramoff questioning.
A brief overview would be awesome.
Thanks in advance.
|
soothsayer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #97 |
99. Not really, but Scotty got really loud several times (= lying, nervous) |
|
Was rude to Helen of course and another female reporter (Pamela the grandstander). Might be worth browsing the transcript. Actually, it's worth seeing Scotty say "Who?" when someone mentions Osama. Hysterically funny!
|
stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #99 |
100. thank you - hopefully I will be available on Thursday for the next Snotty |
Spazito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #97 |
101. Here goes my summary |
|
Abramoff: pres doesn't know him, may have met him a few times, has highest ethics, bla bla bla
Spying on Americans: terra, terra, terra
The bombing of Iraqi family: don't have the facts, still investigating, bla bla bla
Patriot Act: Bad, bad dems, bad, bad, dems
The press was very good tho, didn't let Snotty off the hook and he left in one hell of a hurry.
|
stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #101 |
106. thank you - I love the simple terms you put it in, did you take this from |
Spazito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #106 |
107. LOL! Yep, am channeling his PDBs! n/t |
Spazito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 02:00 PM
Response to Original message |
94. Ohhhhh, excellent question by John? |
|
re why the need for the Patriot Act if bush has the right under the Constitution! Snotty was definitely stunned by that one, imo.
|
myrna minx
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #94 |
96. That is an excellent question. n/t |
Spazito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #96 |
103. Man, Snotty scuttled off with lightning speed after John's question |
|
I suspect he has to go get his talking points to deal with that question, will be interesting to see what they come up with.
|
myrna minx
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #103 |
105. Heh-"I cannot comment on an ongoing press conference." n/t |
in_cog_ni_to
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #94 |
102. Did he answer it? n/t |
Spazito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #102 |
104. No, he scuttled off right after, he really didn't have even the |
|
beginnings of a talking meme on that one, it was VERY interesting, imo!
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 18th 2024, 08:43 PM
Response to Original message |