Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The UAE Has been providing U.S. Port Security since March 2005

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 01:30 PM
Original message
The UAE Has been providing U.S. Port Security since March 2005
Edited on Wed Feb-22-06 01:31 PM by berni_mccoy
http://www.customs.ustreas.gov/xp/cgov/newsroom/press_releases/archives/2005_press_releases/0032005/03282005.xml

Port of Dubai to Implement the Container Security Initiative and Begin Targeting and Pre-Screening Cargo Destined for U.S.


(Saturday, March 26, 2005)
contacts for this press release

Washington, D.C. — The 35th Container Security Initiative (CSI) port becomes operational today at the port of Dubai as announced by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Commissioner Robert C. Bonner and Sultan Ahmed Bin Sulayem, Executive Chairman, Dubai Ports, Customs and Free Zone Corporation, United Arab Emirates (UAE). CSI is the only multinational program in place in the world today that is protecting global trade lanes from being exploited and disrupted by international terrorists.


The United Arab Emirates became the first Middle Eastern country to join CSI when the declaration of principles was signed in Dubai on December 12, 2004. A CBP deployment team will work closely with the UAE government personnel to target high-risk cargo containers destined for the United States. Dubai Customs Administration officials are responsible for screening any container identified jointly with CBP officers as a potential terrorist risk.
...

But, but, ... Aren't the supporters of the Port Deal saying it has nothing to do with Security?!?!




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hopeisaplace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. Glad to see the press was on top of this story back then
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
34. What was happening in March 2005 that distracted them?
Edited on Wed Feb-22-06 02:33 PM by The Backlash Cometh
More bubbles? Or more kidnapped white women? The only way we were ever going to make this a story to attract the media is if we could prove those kidnapped white women were getting smuggled out of this country through those ports.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #34
46. 2 year anniversay of the successful invasion an occupation of Iraq?
I am sure they were telling success stories all week.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. Please put "successful" and "success" in quotes. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #47
48. I didn't think I had to around here
Edited on Wed Feb-22-06 03:31 PM by leftchick
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #48
49. Read this thread... you'll understand why
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. Right after they made sure Bush stayed in power.
It never would have happened with Kerry in office. Gary Hart would have been tagged as Homeland Security director, and he and Kerry were adamant about securing the ports.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProdigalJunkMail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. um...isn't this in reference to Dubai's ports
and not our own? They screen containers in Dubai before they leave for the US...not once they get to the US...

sP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Are we just going to trust these containers once UAE has screened them?
If so, then we are basically trusting UAE with our port security... that's what the article indicates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #4
33. Dubai Ports World follows Ptech template, in place for two yrs prior to
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MazeRat7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
5. Errr... this is about "pre-screening" at the Port of Daubi, not in the US.
I don't see where you get that the UAE is providing US Port security, that is and remains the job of the US Coast Guard and US Customs.

MZr7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. They are screening the containers boud for U.S....
Do we screen them once they arrive?... The answer is no, and by that point, it's too late. We are basically entrusting the security of our ports to the UAE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. No, US ALSO screens them HERE... they cooperate with each
Edited on Wed Feb-22-06 01:48 PM by JCMach1
other...

Imagine that!


In other words... The UAE also American officials to operate in conjuction with local customs to check ANY containers headed to the U.S.

In essence, this is double-checking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. It's a little late to screen for a bomb once it's arrived in NY Harbor...
don't ya think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. You don't get it do you
Ships are screened HERE and ALSO when they enter the US (by US customs in cooperation with UAE customs)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. I think you should read the CSI Initiative before responding
http://www.customs.treas.gov/xp/cgov/border_security/international_activities/csi/csi_in_brief.xml

The four core elements of CSI are:

Identify high-risk containers. CBP uses automated targeting tools to identify containers that pose a potential risk for terrorism, based on advance information and strategic intelligence.

Prescreen and evaluate containers before they are shipped. Containers are screened as early in the supply chain as possible, generally at the port of departure.

Use technology to prescreen high-risk containers to ensure that screening can be done rapidly without slowing down the movement of trade. This technology includes large-scale X-ray and gamma ray machines and radiation detection devices.

Use smarter, more secure containers, which will allow CBP officers at United States ports of arrival to identify containers that have been tampered with during transit.



The U.S. does not have the resources to screen the "Nearly seven million cargo containers arrive on ships and are offloaded at U.S. seaports each year. " (site: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Container_Security_Initiative )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #17
28. So, don't you think MORE checking is valuable
I really don't get your argument.

So, it is not good for customs agents from allied countries to work together to secure the safe movement of goods?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #28
37. ABSOLUTELY, something we agree on. And that's why I don't want DPW
controlling the port.

I believe we should be implementing a U.S. based port security organization that DOES Screen containers and CONTROLS THE PORTS. Instead of spending HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS IN IRAQ, we should be spending them here beefing up our own port and border security, employing AMERICAN WORKERS who will protect AMERICANS.

Selling off port control to foreign interests is SIMPLY A BAD IDEA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. Bushies will never do it...
It would take billions in Port overhaul equipment that can detect nuclear, biological, and chemical threats. It would take thousands of new government employees.

It would slow-down the flow of cheap products to the Wal-marts of this world.


Bush will never do this!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
7. UAE and Saudi Arabia are not the same thing
They are light years apart...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Except the UAE Royalty are very friendly with the Bin Ladens and Bushes
Edited on Wed Feb-22-06 01:47 PM by berni_mccoy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. Rubbish...
Edited on Wed Feb-22-06 01:55 PM by JCMach1
Clinton is the royal favorite here. They invite him back every chance they get.




His most recent visit:


Former President Bill Clinton told Arab students Wednesday the United States made a "big mistake" when it invaded Iraq, stoking the partisan debate back home over the war.

Mr. Clinton cited the lack of planning for what would happen after Saddam Hussein was overthrown.

"Saddam is gone. It's a good thing, but I don't agree with what was done," Mr. Clinton told students at a forum at the American University of Dubai.

"It was a big mistake. The American government made several errors ... one of which is how easy it would be to get rid of Saddam and how hard it would... http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/11/16/politics/main1048605.shtml


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Really not paying attention???
BCCI. Money laundering. Riggs Bank. Uncie Bush. Wake up.

Clinton doesn't have decades of history with these corrupt regimes, the Bushies do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Please then list the Bush links to the Royal Family here
I would like to see them!


The Bush relationship is with the Saudi royals... don't conflate the two! They are not the same thing!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Missed BCCI did you?
Missed Riggs Bank? The links between the Bushes and all of these scandals have been posted repeatedly on DU. I doubt posting them again would convince you.

And I'm not stupid. Saudi Arabia. Oman. Yemen. Kuwait. Qatar. UAE. Lots of countries in the ME, I get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. Billions from all sorts of locations went down in BCCI
It was a major rathole on many counts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. And is now a UAE rathole
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #22
31. Yeah, but the thread poster placed pictures of SAUDI royals
with Bush...

Please pay attention to the important differences.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #31
40. That's just there for effect, to piss off the RWers
They absolutely HATE those pics.

Besides, the UAE Royals, Saudi Royals (bin Ladens) and the Bushes are just one big happy family.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radwriter0555 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
11. NO, DUBAI hasn't. Dubai Port Authority has. It'st the name of a COMPANY.
NOT a state.

As in Dubai Ports World. A giant corporation.

NOT a state. A CORPORATION.

Yes, there is a difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Um, Dubia Ports World is state owned.
It's completely owned/operated by the UAE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Emirate owned... Dubai is the equivalent of a US state
DP is owned by Dubai Municipality (the city of Dubai)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Actually, DP is owned by Dubai, one of the UAE States
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Yes, Dubai Municipality
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #20
42. I don't think Americans are going to pick up on this nuance
Dubai is part of UAE. Period. If you don't like Dubai being associated with the UAE, then you should tell your reps to secede.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radwriter0555 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. And? It's not state RUN. It's a corporation, not an army. They ship things
and very well apparently, considering how global the corporation is, and how successful it is.

I don't get what the problem is.

Somebody should explain the PROBLEM to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. There' s no distinction between state owned and state run in the U.S.
So if you care to elaborate the difference, I'd be happy. Who collects the profits? The government? Whoe pays the employees? The government. I never said it was a military organization. But it's a foreign POWER ensuring the security of our ports, not a publically traded corporation.

And I'm not pointing out a problem moreso than the fact that the U.S. Government has been entrusting its port security to other countries for through the CSI.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. Dubai is not a foreign power... they don't have an army
It's a state... an individual emirate...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #25
30. What is the UAE then?
Ok let's take a different approach. If Dubai is a "state" and it owns DPWorld, then here is a hypothetical reverse situation for you. Let's say N.Y. State owned a company that screened cargo containers for the UAE. And let's say, oh, a crazy right-wing racist who hates any Arab is working for an extreme RW Terrorist organization worked at this company. And let's say they got their hands on a bomb (not a nuke, but a powerful bomb) and were able to get it in because this nut worked at the NY State owned company that screened cargo for the UAE. And on ther other side, at the port of Dubai, is the same NY Owned company, controlling the port of Dubai. The container with the bomb comes in and is shipped to some important facility, maybe a nuclear power plant or a critical part in an oil pipeline. And this bomb goes off at it's destination and either critical infrastructure is damaged or hundreds or thousands of lives are lost. Are you going to be happy that your government outsourced it's port security to a company owned by the state of New York? Are you going to differentiate between the state of NY and any other government? I don't think you would.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. The talking points have been: 'Owned by Foreign Power'
or 'Security Controlled by Foreign Power'

That is not precisely accurate... No foreign government will control this entity. In fact, most of the employees (vast majority) will not even be Arab.

The vast majority of DP workers are from India (here in Dubai anyway).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. Outsourcing terror, or terror intelligence is the heart of plausibledenial
Edited on Wed Feb-22-06 02:36 PM by EVDebs
Check out the example of Ptech prior to 9-11. All that access to FAA and NAS computer systems, with the likely foreknowledge of the wargames taking place during Sept 11, 2001. Very handy.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x491949

To be precise, Outsourcing Terror Planning would be the 'talking point'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. But you don't outsource terror to an ally... instead to extra-state
entities...

If you are MIHOP, you don't need to worry about who manages the ports.

The volume of ports is such you can do it with ease.

It is a gaping hole in security WHOEVER is in charge of the ports.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #36
50. You outsource the blame, get it ?
Ptech and Saudi access within FAA and NAS computers with wargame inside information as of 9-11. And now with UAE and Dubai World Ports well, the 'Sum of All Fears' scenario is laid out for the UAE to be the perfect recipient of the public's wrath no matter what.

Ever hear of PNAC, JCMach1, and the 'New Pearl Harbor' pretext for war necessary to get us into Iraq ? Well now they're aiming at Iran or Syria...Gotta hava new pretext ready by the March 20 europetro conversion by Iran.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #32
39. Again, in the U.S., foreign power = Non U.S.
Edited on Wed Feb-22-06 03:06 PM by berni_mccoy
The Dubai Emirate is considered a "foreign power." It's a cultural thing. We call immigrants aliens too. Aren't we an odd bunch?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oilwellian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. The problem is...
In the past UAE port officials have manipulated shipping manifests, broke export laws, and have very close ties to Iran.

1996: The German government warns its exporters that Iranian companies active in procurement for weapons programs are present in Dubai. Among the entities that arrange and finance technology transfers via front companies in Dubai are Iran's State Purchasing Organization, and Bonyad Mostazafan and Janbazan Foundation.

June 1996: Dubai's Guide Oil Equipment Company is identified in a U.S. court as a corporation that ships impregnated alumina, which can be used in the manufacture of nerve gas, through Dubai or the United Kingdom to Iran. In 1998 Abdol Hamid Rashidian and Henry Joseph Trojack are convicted for conspiring to ship impregnated alumina to Iran.

July 1996 - March 1998: IGI, Inc. sold $400,000 of poultry vaccine from the U.S. to Iran via Dubai, violating the U.S. embargo on Iran.

1997 - 1998: Pars Company Inc. of the U.S. exports two STX gas monitors to the U.A.E. and transships them to Iran. Pars Company did not obtain the required license for the monitors, which can be used in chemical and biological weapons production, and is fined $10,000. The U.S. Department of Commerce subsequently imposes a nine year denial of export privileges in 2002. The U.S. firm Industrial Scientific Corporation is also implicated, and pays a $30,000 fine.

1998: According to the U.S. Department of Commerce, Jabal Damavand General Trading Company of Dubai transfers U.S.-origin ferrography laboratory equipment to Iran without authorization. In 2002 the U.S. bans Jabal Damavand for ten years from engaging in any activity subject to the Export Administration Regulations.

March 1998: According to the U.S. government's Iraq Survey Group (I.S.G.), the Iraqi Intelligence Service uses bribes to circumvent customs inspections in Dubai, which is a transshipment point for military equipment being sought from Romania.

May 1998: A new Sun Ultra Enterprise 1 Work Station is located in Iraq's National Computer Center, which was involved in Iraq's nuclear weapons program. Iraq claims to have imported workstations from the U.A.E. and Jordan.

May 1998 - June 1999: According to the U.S. Department of Commerce, Dubai's Ibn Khaldoon Drug Store Est. participates in the unauthorized export of medical equipment from the U.S. to Iran, in contravention of the U.S. embargo. Ibn Khaldoon is ordered in 2004 to pay a $40,000 fine.

May 1998 - May 2002: Biocheck Inc. of the U.S. allegedly exports medical diagnostic kits without authorization to Iran via Italy and the U.A.E. Biocheck is later fined $32,000 by the U.S. Department of the Treasury, and pays the U.S. Department of Commerce $22,500.

September 1998 - February 2001: NEC Engineers of India allegedly sends 10 shipments of materials used in the manufacture of rocket propellant and missiles to Dubai and Jordan without the required export license. Indian court documents state that the consignments, shipped for $791,343, "appear to have been diverted to Iraq for assisting their weapon building programme," violating the U.N. embargo. NEC Engineers is accused of mis-declaring goods and attempting to export consignments in the name of associated companies. The Dubai companies Target General Land Transport and Indjo Trading are reportedly involved.

November 1998 - February 2000: Mohammad Farahbakhsh, co-owner and managing director of Dubai's Diamond Technology LLC, allegedly tries to export U.S. computer items to Iran via Diamond Technology. The alleged purchaser is Shahid Hemmat Industrial Group, which is a branch of the Iranian Ministry of Defence and subject to U.S. sanctions for its involvement in cruise and ballistic missile development.

1998 - 2000: Mazyar Gavidel and his company Homa International Trading Corp. violate the U.S. trade embargo against Iran by illegally transferring approximately $2 million of laundered money through Dubai. Gavidel and Homa International are convicted by the U.S. in August 2002.

January 1999: Abu Bakar Siddiqui, a British exporter of Pakistani origin and an alleged procurement agent for A.Q. Khan, allegedly attempts to ship special aluminum sheets to Dubai.

May 1999: British customs authorities reportedly seize up to 20 tons of components, including high-grade aluminum, believed to be ultimately destined for Pakistan. The cargo arrived from the U.S. and was allegedly about to be shipped to Dubai. The exporter is allegedly Siddiqui, who is convicted in the United Kingdom in 2001 for illegally exporting strategic materials to Pakistan, including high-strength aluminum bars.

2000: Ras Al Khaimah Free Trade Zone is established near Saqr Port. Companies in the zone are exempt from all domestic ownership and capital requirements, as well as income and corporate taxes.

2001: U.A.E. companies act as intermediaries in the partial delivery of fiber-optic and military communications contracts from South Korea to Iraq, according to the I.S.G.

2001: Dubai's Ports, Customs & Free Zone Corporation is established to take over customs operations from the Dubai Ports Authority and Jebel Ali Free Zone Authority.

June 2001: Bef Corp. allegedly exports photo finishing equipment to SK of Dubai, which transships the equipment to Iran, in violation of U.S. sanctions.

September 2001: The U.A.E.'s Advance Technical Systems purchases $16,000 of military radar components from the U.S. and transships them to Pakistan after declaring that they were for the Bangladeshi Air Force. Following guilty pleas delivered in June 2003 for the illegal export of parts for howitzers, radars and armored personnel carriers, two U.S. citizens and one Pakistani are imprisoned.

October 2001: A U.A.E.-based firm acts as an intermediary to facilitate the trade in ballistic missile-related goods from China to Iraq, according to the I.S.G.

May 2002: The German government warns its exporters that since 1998 Iraq has been increasingly engaging in procurement activities through Dubai. Germany believes that North Korea has also increased its operations in Dubai.

August 2002: The U.S. firm Mercator, Inc. agrees a $30,000 settlement with the U.S. Department of Commerce, which had alleged that Mercator had exported chemicals to Dubai with the knowledge that they would be re-exported to Iran without prior authorization.

December 2002: The U.S. Navy accuses Dubai's Naif Marine Services of smuggling to Iraq polymers that could be used to manufacture explosives.

2003: Ajman Port, which is adjacent to Ajman Free Zone, now serves over 1,000 ships a year.

January 2003: Spare parts for Mirage F-1 aircraft and Gazelle attack helicopters are transferred to Iraq. U.S. intelligence reportedly believes that parts were purchased from France by Dubai's Al Tamoor Trading Co., and then smuggled to Iraq through at third country, reportedly Turkey.

May 2003 - February 2004: U.A.E.-based Diamond Technology LLC and its managing director Mohammad Farahbakhsh allegedly export a U.S. satellite communications system to Iran without the required license.

June 2003: 311 companies attend the third U.A.E. Trade Exhibition in Iran. Trade with Iran exchanged through Dubai's ports was 12 billion dirhams in 2001, an increase from 4.3 billion in 1997.

October 2003: 66 triggered spark gaps, which can be used to detonate nuclear weapons, are shipped without the required license from the United States to Top-Cape Technology in South Africa. They are subsequently transshipped via Dubai to AJMC Lithographic Aid Society in Pakistan. In 2004 Asher Karni, an Israeli living in South Africa, pleads guilty to conspiring to export controlled commodities to Pakistan without validated export licenses. In 2005 the U.S. indicts Humayun Khan of the Pakistani company Pakland PME for violating export restrictions and being the ultimate purchaser.

October 2003: Five containers of centrifuge components, sent by B.S.A. Tahir and shipped through Dubai, are seized en route to Libya. The items are part of four shipments made by Malaysia's Scomi Precision Engineering (SCOPE) between 2002 and 2003 to Dubai's Aryash Trading Company. One of the four consignments lists the addressee as Gulf Technical Industries, but is diverted to Desert Electrical Equipment Factory, also based in Dubai.

October 2003: According to B.S.A. Tahir, the BBC China, the ship carrying the seized centrifuge components, was also transporting an aluminum casting and dynamo for Libya's centrifuge workshop. The consignment was allegedly sent via Dubai by TUT Shipping on behalf of Gunas Jireh of Turkey.

October 2003: Two weeks after the seizure of the centrifuge components, B.S.A. Tahir arranges the transshipment to Libya, via Dubai, of an electrical cabinet and power supplier-voltage regulator on behalf of Selim Alguadis, an associate of A.Q. Khan.

December 2003: Hamid Fathaloloomy, principal of Dubai's Akeed Trading Company, allegedly attempts to export U.S. pressure sensors to Iran.

2004: Over 400 companies are operating in the Ras Al Khaimah Free Trade Zone, 38% of which are Indian.

2004: Dubai Ports Authority's capacity passes six million TEU.

April 2004: The U.A.E. freezes the accounts of SMB Computers as part of its investigation into B.S.A. Tahir, who is the Group Managing Director.

April 2004: Elmstone Service and Trading FZE is sanctioned for two years by the United States for transferring to Iran equipment and/or technology of proliferation significance since 1999.

June 2004: 1383 companies are operating in SAIF-Zone.

August 2004: The U.S. indicts Khalid Mahmood, of Dubai, for breaking the U.S. embargo to Iran. Mahmood allegedly attempted to arrange the sale of forklift radiators from the U.S. to Iran, by concealing the final destination in the sale.

September 2004: The I.S.G. lists 20 U.A.E. firms that are suspected of having acted as intermediaries or front companies for Saddam Hussein's Iraq, and says that the U.A.E. was a transit location for prohibited goods, with companies using deceptive trade practices. The I.S.G. also concludes that the U.A.E. and Iran were the most frequent destinations for Iraqi smuggled oil and owned the majority of smuggling vessels involved.

http://www.wisconsinproject.org/countries/dubai/transsh...

And we're to trust this country with our major ports?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. All well and good
the UAE doesn't embargo Iran.

For that matter, I have a business with a license for this OMINOUS SAIF-ZONE.

I also have Iranian carpets on my floor!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oilwellian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #27
41. It's really great you have Iranian carpets on your floor
I'm not really sure what that has to do with the possibility of UAE operatives who are in a position to change shipping manifests and hide nefarious cargo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #41
44. You understand that can be done anywhere
There are a host of places far more unsafe than UAE...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #44
45. Doesn't make any of it right
A wrong-doing is a wrong-doing, no matter how much, how frequently or in how many places it's going on. We need to take care of our own security, period. That is the only acceptable answer and is why the entire port deal stinks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
43. But Scotty said we do ALL of our port security!!!
He wouldn't lie now, would he????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC