Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Can we do a search on the individuals named in this 2004 Guardian report?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 05:15 PM
Original message
Can we do a search on the individuals named in this 2004 Guardian report?
I have a suspicion it connects to the port deal, arms dealing and BushInc in general. My domestic responsibilities (hungry 5yo) are interrupting my search.

>>>>>
Documents previously seized by MoD police detail £17m of alleged payments to a Saudi responsible for arms purchases from Britain, Prince Turki bin Nasser.
The new documents refer to events in spring 2002, when BAE faced a crisis over US and British pressure to curb corruption in foreign contracts. Those involved say BAE sought to restrict future payments, following a deal with the US contractor Lockheed, and the passage of new British legislation.

In the documents the Guardian has seen, a memo dated March 13 2002 refers to a phone call from the slush fund's alleged controller, Tony Winship, to Stuart Fordyce, the finance director of a front company, Travellers' World Ltd, which was handling the payments for the benefit of prominent Saudis.

Mr Fordyce says: "Tony phoned me ... said he had just had a meeting with SDE. His meeting was very positive ... SDE was very supportive and reinforced the message already given you by TBN ... SDE personally dropped Tony off at the Carlton Tower after the meeting."

A second note in the Travellers' World files is dated February 11 2002. It refers to a meeting at the Carlton Tower hotel between Sir Dick and Prince Turki himself.

A third memo, dated March 4 2002, allegedly refers to a phone call from Mr Winship. It says: "Tony said he had 2 conversations with the top man in Preston" - BAE headquarters.

A fourth note is a copy of a letter to the firm's solicitors, Blake-Turner & Co, dated April 9 2002. It refers to "the meeting between TBN and Dick Evans on 8 April" and says: "I am advised BAE intend to continue paying for the TBN programme".

On May 28, according to the files, a meeting took place involving Damien Turner, a BAE executive. He is recorded saying that Peter Wilson, the senior executive in charge of the Saudi programme, was unwilling to process any more payments to Saudis, largely because of the Lockheed deal. "Damien said 30% of BAE sales were now into the US market. It was a 'very sensitive issue'.

"Damien added that BAE had long-term interests in Saudi ... but they might not be happening for 1-2 years."
>>>>>>>
http://politics.guardian.co.uk/foreignaffairs/story/0,11538,1209754,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. While that scandal indeed deserves investigation
why do you think it has a link to ports? It's the latest bit in a long line of bribes paid by BAE to Saudis for arms - it stretches back to Mark Thatcher, and how he became a millionaire without having any talent for anything. But where is the link to Dubai or P&O?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. The last two pieces of clipped info in OP -
there were interests that would be coming in the next year or 2 - deals that wouldn't be made until Bush retained control of WH, is my guess. The port deal was in the works in Dec 2004.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Saudi Arabia is not UAE. BAE is not P&O. (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I know - but both are still involved with BushInc and those connection
Edited on Wed Feb-22-06 07:01 PM by blm
have popped up in every other Bush scandal like BCCI. And it's not like they're strangers - fer chrissakes, they operate in the exact same circles. I know call girls who've partied with both Saudis and UAE royals - at the same events.

This is a quest to search out players and links for interested people. If you aren't interested in doing the legwork, then move on. Or is there another reason you are interested in dampening the efforts here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. OK, I'll move on
If the connection is "they're Arab royals", then you'll have a lot to investigate. Good luck - and with the hungry 5yo too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Listen - I know the difference, and since BCCI, I know the similarities.
There are Saudi royals and UAE royals and on fascist issues they have the same partner - Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. Eye opening.
Thanks, blm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC