Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

None of the ILLEGAL donations went to Dems. None.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-04-06 02:05 PM
Original message
None of the ILLEGAL donations went to Dems. None.
Lather. Rinse. Repeat.

NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
txindy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-04-06 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. The Indian tribes were bilked for millions by Abramoff.
THEY are the ones who gave money to the Democrats, as they always have. All were LEGAL campaign contributions.

The real crime is the money you don't see changing hands between Abramoff and other repub scum. It's all under the table. Hence the tax evasion charges. The money trail isn't the one listed in federal records of campaign contributions. It's the money you can't see. It's the fake charities and other scams Abramoff ran with Scanlon. BugBoy's in this up to his beady little eyeballs, too.

NGU, right back at ya!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-04-06 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. This is a Republicon Abramoff Scandal!
Edited on Wed Jan-04-06 02:15 PM by ClassWarrior
:hi: txindy!!

NNNGU!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-04-06 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Interesting Chart below shows none of Abramoff personal funds went to Dems
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-04-06 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. See?
NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-04-06 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Doing the math, you see an 80-20 split in total funds.
100-0 split in Abramoff funds.

That's $806,310 to Republicans and $204,480 to Democrats in total Abramoff-related funds. No personal funding for Democrats from Abramoff.

And yet, this is a bipartisan scandal.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-04-06 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Why do you say "Abramoff-related funds?"
Do you file a "Abramoff-related tax return?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-04-06 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. If Abramoff is my accountant, maybe.
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-04-06 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. So, are you under the impression that Jack Abramoff does
accounting for Native Americans?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MellowOne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #3
19. How come DeLay received the most from Abramoff?
LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-04-06 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
6. None.
NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-04-06 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
10. Not a one.
None.

NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-04-06 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
11. Zilch.
NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jazzjunkysue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-04-06 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
12. Right. Here are the links. They're long, ugly links, but they're proof
(Warrior: Hand me a towel :) )
http://mediamatters.org/items/200512190014

"In fact, according to the Center for Responsive Politics (here and here), only Republicans received contributions directly from Abramoff."

http://www.opensecrets.org/indivs/search.asp?txtName=abramoff&txtState=DC&txtZip=&txtEmploy=&txtCand=&txt2006=Y&txt2004=Y&txt2002=Y&txt2000=&txt1998=&txt1996=&txt1994=&txt1992=&txt1990=&txtSoft=N&Order=N&Cycles=3&Cycle1=2006&Cycle2=2004&Cycle3=2002&Page=1

http://www.opensecrets.org/indivs/search.asp?NumOfThou=0&txtName=abramoff&txtState=DC&txtZip=&txtEmploy=&txtCand=&txt2000=Y&txt1998=Y&Order=N

"Appearing on the December 16 edition of MSNBC's Hardball with Chris Matthews, Kornblut falsely claimed that Abramoff had given contributions to Democrats. Yet a Media Matters for America search of the Center for Responsive Politics database of campaign contributions did not find any contributions from Abramoff to Democrats or Democratic leadership political action committees.

Although Kornblut amended her statement to claim that Abramoff "had his clients donate to Democrats," her comment falsely suggests that Republicans and Democrats are equally enmeshed in the scandal surrounding Abramoff. In fact, while Democrats have received contributions from Abramoff's lobbying groups and his clients, Kornblut's statement ignores the difference between accepting contributions from groups linked to Abramoff, which is legal and proper, and taking contributions in exchange for official actions, which is illegal, and which is at the heart of the ongoing investigations.

A November 25 Washington Post article identified four lawmakers under investigation in connection to Abramoff -- former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-TX), Sen. Conrad Burns (R-MT), Rep. Rob Ney (R-OH), and Rep. John T. Doolittle (R-CA) -- all Republicans."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-04-06 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
13. Zippo.
NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-04-06 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
14. Nada.
NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
15. Bupkis.
NGU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
16. Diddly squat.
NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
17. So, what are you trying to say? That no Abramoff money went to Dems?
Is that it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. None of the ILLEGAL money, at any rate.
NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dailykoff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
20. Thanks for making this clear. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xenotime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
21. Dems are innocent as always....
it's the rethugs who are criminals
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Mike doesn't call it the Bush** Crime Family for nuthin'...
NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC