|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 12:55 PM Original message |
thread # 2 on Senate Hearing of port issue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JesterCS (627 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 12:56 PM Response to Original message |
1. eating my popcorn |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Viva_La_Revolution (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 12:57 PM Response to Original message |
2. Thanks! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasLady (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 12:58 PM Response to Original message |
3. thank YEW for number two! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 12:58 PM Response to Original message |
4. well, i had lunch no popcorn drats. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:00 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. Levin is trying to impress on the bums that they should have done a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:01 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. ah ha-Levin--If you or Exc. branch does NOT like the law-come to us |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:02 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. Levin wants Sen. Legal consil to address the law also as he does not trust |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Coexist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 12:59 PM Response to Original message |
5. Woo hoo! Thanks Rodeodance! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Coexist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:00 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. "if you want the law changed, come to Congress to CHANGE it" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JesterCS (627 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:00 PM Response to Reply #5 |
9. WOW |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Norquist Nemesis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:00 PM Response to Original message |
7. Kimmett: We didn't ignore the law; we might interpret it differently |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChiciB1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:03 PM Response to Reply #7 |
20. I Was Just Going To Post The Same Thing! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:05 PM Response to Reply #7 |
22. surreal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:05 PM Response to Reply #7 |
23. Isn't it ODD how no laws are ever ignored, they're just "interpreted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:24 PM Response to Reply #23 |
76. "might" interpret it differently |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cal04 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:00 PM Response to Original message |
10. it is SO obvious this could affect national security |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Coexist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:02 PM Response to Reply #10 |
15. "that has been one of the tough questions" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:25 PM Response to Reply #10 |
77. but but...Haven't you been listening to Bush? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liveoaktx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:01 PM Response to Original message |
12. Unreal- Warner- let's get you to write down your INTERPRETATION of the law |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:03 PM Response to Reply #12 |
17. gawd-this has a de ju vu of the WH and NSA--make up laws as you go. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:02 PM Response to Original message |
14. OK. I was on the phone and missed whether anyone was sworn in. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JesterCS (627 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:03 PM Response to Reply #14 |
18. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Norquist Nemesis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:03 PM Response to Reply #14 |
19. NOPE!!!!!!! Apparently, this is a "briefing" rather than a "hearing" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:07 PM Response to Reply #19 |
27. Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr! Those assholes! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Norquist Nemesis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:17 PM Response to Reply #27 |
59. Ha! They're probably watching Rove stroking Hannity |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:31 PM Response to Reply #19 |
90. yes. it seems the WH sent down their Secretaries to get the 'facts" to all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sydnie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:02 PM Response to Original message |
16. gonzales is going to save the day again with his "interpretation" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:04 PM Response to Reply #16 |
21. te he but Levin asked to have Senate lawyers also look at the law!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Norquist Nemesis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:06 PM Original message |
War is Peace n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:06 PM Response to Original message |
24. Levin keeps throwing in pat UAE -1/3 countries that recognized Taliban. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:07 PM Response to Reply #24 |
28. Lawery--there was only one official meeting then they looks at documents. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:08 PM Response to Reply #28 |
31. whow--they do not minutes or any documenations of these meetings yet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pdxmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:06 PM Response to Original message |
25. Someone needs to make the executive branch take a basic course |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Norquist Nemesis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:08 PM Response to Reply #25 |
32. When law are "interpreted" by judges, they're called 'activist' n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JesterCS (627 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:07 PM Response to Original message |
26. Clinton Up Again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Norquist Nemesis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:09 PM Response to Reply #26 |
33. Q: How many times did CFIUS meet? A: Once |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Coexist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:07 PM Response to Original message |
29. Clinton: "are there proxy rules for CFIUS?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liveoaktx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:07 PM Response to Original message |
30. How Casually our National Security is taken-ONE OFFICIAL MEETING of CFIUS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:09 PM Response to Reply #30 |
34. the Secretaries are getting a little tense. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JesterCS (627 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:10 PM Response to Reply #34 |
35. Clay was looking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:10 PM Response to Reply #34 |
38. did you hear that. A secretary said he thought the company would keep |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:11 PM Response to Reply #38 |
39. whow. questions from the press. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:12 PM Response to Reply #39 |
42. Warner says it is unwise to say what Congress/WH will do in the future |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:12 PM Response to Reply #42 |
47. Hillary telling the press there WILL be legislation introduced. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Norquist Nemesis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:12 PM Response to Reply #38 |
46. Amazing doesn't describe that statement! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:15 PM Response to Reply #46 |
53. yes, and Clinton keeps reminding them--but......(they are a bit slow) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Coexist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:10 PM Response to Reply #30 |
37. "I guess I would have thought they would have contacted the states" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jeanette in FL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:10 PM Response to Original message |
36. I have a question? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:12 PM Response to Reply #36 |
43. They've probably been threatened by the WH. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liveoaktx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:12 PM Response to Reply #36 |
45. Don't know why they aren't there-but they aren't-ONLY Dems |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:30 PM Response to Reply #45 |
89. It IS odd--maybe they are out fund raising? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Viva_La_Revolution (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:24 PM Original message |
they all had "previous commitments" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Norquist Nemesis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:11 PM Response to Original message |
40. "I would have thought that the companies would have consulted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Coexist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:11 PM Response to Original message |
41. Clinton's point about having to include the states in what happens |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Norquist Nemesis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:14 PM Response to Reply #41 |
51. And the Secretary says, "Oh good one! I though it was 'the company's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Witch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:12 PM Response to Original message |
44. Oh, I am so sick of the Long War. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liveoaktx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:13 PM Response to Reply #44 |
48. I heard Kimmitt (the other one) last night say that people who think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:32 PM Response to Reply #48 |
91. He is right. This WH wants to spread democracy--troops are just one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:14 PM Response to Reply #44 |
50. yes, rather sick that the reporter would assume a "long war"!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Norquist Nemesis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:16 PM Response to Reply #50 |
57. Well, it's time for us to start calling it the "endless war" n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Coexist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:13 PM Response to Original message |
49. Clinton "there WILL be legislation introduced" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cal04 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:14 PM Response to Original message |
52. Is this the Joseph that got us into Iraq |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Coexist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:15 PM Response to Original message |
54. CBS question - "only one port in question is equipped with a working |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sydnie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:15 PM Response to Original message |
55. Are these reporters being allowed to ask questions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Coexist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:18 PM Response to Reply #55 |
60. Reuters: After this today, do any of you now believe that there should |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Coexist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:18 PM Response to Reply #60 |
64. that was funny. eom. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JesterCS (627 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:15 PM Response to Original message |
56. only 1 of the 6 ports has radiation scanner n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:17 PM Response to Reply #56 |
58. Reuters--asking if 45 day invest. will be a good idea. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:18 PM Response to Reply #58 |
61. te he--one Sec is saying it would be up to Adm. to determine if 45 day |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:18 PM Response to Reply #61 |
65. boy--look at all the press in the room. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liveoaktx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:18 PM Response to Reply #58 |
62. Good question-how many 45 day investigations have there been? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Norquist Nemesis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:21 PM Response to Reply #62 |
69. Interesting he doesn't have the details under this administration |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FormerRepublican (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:18 PM Response to Reply #58 |
63. Non answer. I can't do anything without Bush holding my hand. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:20 PM Response to Reply #63 |
66. oh OH--Warner said as of now he has not found a breach in procedures |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cal04 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:20 PM Response to Reply #66 |
67. wonder if he got any phone calls |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:22 PM Response to Reply #67 |
70. my wonder is---Did he have coffee with Bush last night? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:20 PM Response to Reply #66 |
68. DAM--Imo--this means he will not rec. the 45 day to Bush !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skidmore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:25 PM Response to Reply #68 |
80. It will then get kicked to the states and the courts where the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Norquist Nemesis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:23 PM Response to Reply #66 |
72. Well, Hell! Let's just open it all up!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:26 PM Response to Reply #72 |
83. "I just can't imagine" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:24 PM Response to Reply #66 |
74. One must remember that Warner is a Moonie. He is the one who set up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mainah (7 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:35 PM Response to Reply #58 |
93. stats on investigations from 2005 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rose Siding (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:37 PM Response to Reply #93 |
98. Thanks, mainah. Welcome to DU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mainah (7 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:39 PM Response to Reply #98 |
101. Thanks! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:23 PM Response to Original message |
71. UAE company are here now--saying at the embassy in DC--cnn was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:24 PM Response to Reply #71 |
73. is there any doubt when they stay at the embassy that it is state-owned |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Norquist Nemesis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:24 PM Response to Reply #71 |
75. They won't interview with them because "Lou Dobbs won't shut up" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:25 PM Response to Reply #75 |
81. yes, i recall that statement now. te he. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Coexist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:28 PM Response to Reply #75 |
84. I saw that - it was great - he was pissed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cal04 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:25 PM Response to Original message |
78. yuk fox |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Norquist Nemesis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:25 PM Response to Original message |
79. Clinton: "Definition of National Security is a moving target" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Coexist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:26 PM Response to Reply #79 |
82. I snorted when I heard that! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:37 PM Response to Reply #79 |
99. yes. good one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Norquist Nemesis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:28 PM Response to Original message |
85. There you have it! Warner just said no problem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skidmore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:28 PM Response to Reply #85 |
86. He calls that a "full disclosure"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:28 PM Response to Original message |
87. lets have few nominations for the last afternoon people. I have to leave |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cal04 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:29 PM Response to Original message |
88. GOOD finally someone asks about the public |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cal04 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:36 PM Response to Reply #88 |
95. Pacifica radio:Hillary answered great |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:34 PM Response to Original message |
92. a press person is asking for documents and Warner seems to say yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:35 PM Response to Original message |
94. Whow==Hil--this in not about race--but the track record of UAE/company |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
suffragette (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:37 PM Response to Reply #94 |
97. And she completely confronted and turned the whole |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:38 PM Response to Reply #97 |
100. I raise a glass to HIL. She done good today. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
suffragette (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:41 PM Response to Reply #100 |
103. And a glass to you, too, for this thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:36 PM Response to Original message |
96. Warner--we need to look at the 'ambuity of the law"---GEECH--so now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:39 PM Response to Reply #96 |
102. a Dem is first caller to cspan Call in now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fooj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:41 PM Response to Reply #96 |
106. Screw Warner. Time to pack your bags, you rat bastard. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:41 PM Response to Original message |
104. hey was that a Repug saying that America needs a fresh breath of air after |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JesterCS (627 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:41 PM Response to Reply #104 |
105. Independant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Coexist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:42 PM Response to Reply #104 |
107. I missed it - what was the context? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JesterCS (627 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:43 PM Response to Reply #107 |
109. Basically |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:42 PM Response to Reply #104 |
108. Clinton talking to press so csapn is letting us listen. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:43 PM Response to Reply #108 |
110. she is explaining the 45 day bill that is being proposed says it has |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:44 PM Response to Reply #110 |
112. Hil:--she is amazed that no one in Adm. thinks this could affect nat. se |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:45 PM Response to Reply #112 |
113. says, not one person raised one red flag!!!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cal04 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:44 PM Response to Original message |
111. bill should be out by next week |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
suffragette (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:45 PM Response to Reply #111 |
114. "on the face of it, it could affect national security" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:46 PM Response to Reply #111 |
116. but she also said 'unless the WH makes a move" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:47 PM Response to Reply #116 |
117. meaning the WH could (if use brains)-call for the 45 day review. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cal04 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:46 PM Response to Original message |
115. I'll be surprised if they get more than one call |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JesterCS (627 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:47 PM Response to Reply #115 |
118. Current caller |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cal04 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:47 PM Response to Reply #118 |
119. republican appalled and about to change parties |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JesterCS (627 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:48 PM Response to Reply #115 |
120. lol repub is about to swith to dem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cal04 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:50 PM Response to Reply #120 |
124. Independent from FLa |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gkhouston (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:52 PM Response to Reply #124 |
128. excellent question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:48 PM Response to Reply #115 |
121. two callers saying they are scared by what they heard (not heard) today. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:48 PM Response to Reply #121 |
122. and one was a Repug saying he was ready to switch to Dem. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:49 PM Response to Reply #122 |
123. he basically said that the Adm panal was incompetant!!!! whow. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JesterCS (627 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:50 PM Response to Reply #121 |
126. the one Indenpendant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:50 PM Response to Original message |
125. Indep. caller asking why we have to outsource everything. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:51 PM Response to Reply #125 |
127. caller--appalled that people on panal think nat. secur. NOT affected. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:52 PM Response to Reply #127 |
129. gee, i do not think the Repug callers are agreeing with the Dems. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:53 PM Response to Reply #129 |
132. Indep caller wants American conpanies to bid on these sales. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:53 PM Response to Reply #132 |
135. he also said that we need to consider if these are kickbacks to Bush |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gkhouston (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:54 PM Response to Reply #135 |
137. Okay, which one of you is calling the Independent line? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cal04 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:52 PM Response to Reply #125 |
130. Bingo All about money |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skidmore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:52 PM Response to Original message |
131. Folks, I don't think this little charade Warner put on helped one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gkhouston (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:53 PM Response to Reply #131 |
133. expect WH backpedaling to begin shortly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skidmore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:54 PM Response to Reply #133 |
136. Cheney? during a bout of PTSD resulting from the trauma he |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JesterCS (627 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:53 PM Response to Reply #131 |
134. Independant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:54 PM Response to Reply #134 |
138. well, Warner just lost! (he and the WH panal) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:55 PM Response to Reply #138 |
139. Dems one; WH/Warner ZIPPO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cal04 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 01:55 PM Response to Reply #131 |
140. I think you're right, even the repubs don't want |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 02:03 PM Response to Reply #140 |
141. i am hoping this is the straw that breaks the camels back! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cal04 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 02:11 PM Response to Reply #141 |
142. we still have work to do on those |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:22 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC