Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

thread # 2 on Senate Hearing of port issue

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 12:55 PM
Original message
thread # 2 on Senate Hearing of port issue
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JesterCS Donating Member (627 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. eating my popcorn
this is entertaining =D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. Thanks!
:hi:

:popcorn:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasLady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. thank YEW for number two!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. well, i had lunch no popcorn drats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Levin is trying to impress on the bums that they should have done a
longer better 45 day review.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. ah ha-Levin--If you or Exc. branch does NOT like the law-come to us
and talk to Congress===please do NOT interpret the law for us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Levin wants Sen. Legal consil to address the law also as he does not trust
Gonzalas! YEah
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
5. Woo hoo! Thanks Rodeodance!
"the question is whether or not it was interpreted CORRECTLY"

"an ambiguity has been found in a statue that is UNAMBIGUOUS".

Levin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. "if you want the law changed, come to Congress to CHANGE it"
"don't IGNORE it" Levin zinger (again)

Kimmet is stuttering and sputtering!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JesterCS Donating Member (627 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. WOW
"If you dont like it, come to congress and change it. dont interpret it away."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
7. Kimmett: We didn't ignore the law; we might interpret it differently
Orwell
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChiciB1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #7
20. I Was Just Going To Post The Same Thing!
Now, how many times have we HEARD THIS????

Folks, it's OUR DUTY to do something to stop this INSANITY!!

How do we get some sort of PEACEFUL REVOLT started??? I don't know how to go about it.

King George sits on his throne and laughs out loud!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #7
22. surreal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #7
23. Isn't it ODD how no laws are ever ignored, they're just "interpreted
differently?" What is it with these people?:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #23
76. "might" interpret it differently
so, no reason to worry really...

:think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
10. it is SO obvious this could affect national security
what the hell are these guys getting paid
Go Levin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. "that has been one of the tough questions"
gee -maybe because you ignored a law meant to protect our national security interests.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #10
77. but but...Haven't you been listening to Bush?
te he.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
12. Unreal- Warner- let's get you to write down your INTERPRETATION of the law
Sheesh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. gawd-this has a de ju vu of the WH and NSA--make up laws as you go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
14. OK. I was on the phone and missed whether anyone was sworn in.
Were they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JesterCS Donating Member (627 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. No
no swearing in's or anything. Its a show. But its public. and people are watching. thats what matters
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. NOPE!!!!!!! Apparently, this is a "briefing" rather than a "hearing"
although Warner has referred to it as a "hearing" a couple of times. *sigh* Who know which it is, but the answer to your questions is "NO!" :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #19
27. Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr! Those assholes!
I hope their constituents are watching this!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #27
59. Ha! They're probably watching Rove stroking Hannity
or Hannity stroking Rove depending on which way you look at it.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x500543
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #19
90. yes. it seems the WH sent down their Secretaries to get the 'facts" to all
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
16. gonzales is going to save the day again with his "interpretation"
of the law. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. te he but Levin asked to have Senate lawyers also look at the law!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:06 PM
Original message
War is Peace n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
24. Levin keeps throwing in pat UAE -1/3 countries that recognized Taliban.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. Lawery--there was only one official meeting then they looks at documents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. whow--they do not minutes or any documenations of these meetings yet
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pdxmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
25. Someone needs to make the executive branch take a basic course
in government. Their job isn't to "interpret" the laws. I'm totally amazed at how laws are constantly reinterpreted by this president and company to mean whatever the hell they want. I'm sure they see laws as "guidelines".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #25
32. When law are "interpreted" by judges, they're called 'activist' n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JesterCS Donating Member (627 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
26. Clinton Up Again
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #26
33. Q: How many times did CFIUS meet? A: Once
:wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
29. Clinton: "are there proxy rules for CFIUS?"
what is she getting at? Sounds like a set-up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
30. How Casually our National Security is taken-ONE OFFICIAL MEETING of CFIUS
Edited on Thu Feb-23-06 01:08 PM by liveoaktx
pffttttt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #30
34. the Secretaries are getting a little tense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JesterCS Donating Member (627 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. Clay was looking
like he was gonna piss himself right there hehe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #34
38. did you hear that. A secretary said he thought the company would keep
in touch with the local folks (not them).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. whow. questions from the press.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #39
42. Warner says it is unwise to say what Congress/WH will do in the future
about this issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #42
47. Hillary telling the press there WILL be legislation introduced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #38
46. Amazing doesn't describe that statement!
The company? The "company" that is state-run????

God, help us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #46
53. yes, and Clinton keeps reminding them--but......(they are a bit slow)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #30
37. "I guess I would have thought they would have contacted the states"
but I didn't think to ask??? This guy is looking as bad as heckuva job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeanette in FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
36. I have a question?
I just got in and I have been trying to read up on the previous thread, but where are the Republicans. I have already heard Levin and Clinton twice. Where are they and why are they not participating in the questioning other than Warner?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #36
43. They've probably been threatened by the WH.
Just a guess though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #36
45. Don't know why they aren't there-but they aren't-ONLY Dems
It's a sham
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #45
89. It IS odd--maybe they are out fund raising?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:24 PM
Original message
they all had "previous commitments"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
40. "I would have thought that the companies would have consulted
the of the" ports involved. WTF??? The UAE would go and talk with these officials?

That is the the most ABSURD statement of this whole proceeding!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
41. Clinton's point about having to include the states in what happens
and who controls their ports was a good one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #41
51. And the Secretary says, "Oh good one! I though it was 'the company's
responsibility'"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
44. Oh, I am so sick of the Long War.
I've heard that phrase so much recently. No Long War! You MORONS! They're trying to turn it into an INFINITE War... aaaghh :mad: :argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #44
48. I heard Kimmitt (the other one) last night say that people who think
that once we bring the troops home from Afgh and Iraq it'll be over are fooling themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #48
91. He is right. This WH wants to spread democracy--troops are just one
mode to do that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #44
50. yes, rather sick that the reporter would assume a "long war"!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #50
57. Well, it's time for us to start calling it the "endless war" n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
49. Clinton "there WILL be legislation introduced"
to require the investigation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
52. Is this the Joseph that got us into Iraq
war
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
54. CBS question - "only one port in question is equipped with a working
radiation system"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
55. Are these reporters being allowed to ask questions
ON THE RECORD? I have never seen this happen before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #55
60. Reuters: After this today, do any of you now believe that there should
have been a 45-day follow-up?

Kimmet: because it involves pending legislation, I am not been in a position to comment

Reuters: But the legislation hasn't been introduced yet.

Hee hee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #60
64. that was funny. eom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JesterCS Donating Member (627 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
56. only 1 of the 6 ports has radiation scanner n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #56
58. Reuters--asking if 45 day invest. will be a good idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #58
61. te he--one Sec is saying it would be up to Adm. to determine if 45 day
investigation is nec. oh oh. what will Jr. do now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #61
65. boy--look at all the press in the room.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #58
62. Good question-how many 45 day investigations have there been?
25 cases since 1988-2005
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #62
69. Interesting he doesn't have the details under this administration
I'm guessing you could count the number under Bush on one hand or they'ld be touting that number to boost the "we're protecting 'Mrka" banner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FormerRepublican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #58
63. Non answer. I can't do anything without Bush holding my hand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #63
66. oh OH--Warner said as of now he has not found a breach in procedures
or in security--
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #66
67. wonder if he got any phone calls
Edited on Thu Feb-23-06 01:21 PM by cal04
from his people at home
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #67
70. my wonder is---Did he have coffee with Bush last night?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #66
68. DAM--Imo--this means he will not rec. the 45 day to Bush !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #68
80. It will then get kicked to the states and the courts where the
decision will be made, right? Then neither the administration or the Congress will be seen as being directly responsible. It will just be something about interpretation of law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #66
72. Well, Hell! Let's just open it all up!!!
Edited on Thu Feb-23-06 01:23 PM by Norquist Nemesis
Then Condi can trot out before the microphone and say, "Who would have thought..." and "Nobody knew"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #72
83. "I just can't imagine"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #66
74. One must remember that Warner is a Moonie. He is the one who set up
Rev. Moon's coronation as the messiah in the Dirksen bldg. This man is not to be trusted on any level.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mainah Donating Member (7 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #58
93. stats on investigations from 2005

To date, more than 1500 notices have been filed with CFIUS;
Twenty-five transactions required an investigation; importantly, four transactions have required investigations since September 11, 2001, more than the previous 10 years combined;
Of the 25 investigations, 12 were sent to the President requiring a decision as to whether to block the transaction; and
Of the 12 deals that were sent to the President, one was prohibited (In 1990, China National Aero Technology Import & Export Corp. was required to sell its interest in a Seattle-based aircraft component company called Mamco Manufacturing Inc.).
Thirteen transactions have been withdrawn without a decision.


http://www.ofii.org/factsheet.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #93
98. Thanks, mainah. Welcome to DU
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mainah Donating Member (7 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #98
101. Thanks!
I've actually been here for well over a year but am always too timid to post. Thanks for the welcome!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
71. UAE company are here now--saying at the embassy in DC--cnn was
upset that they would not be interviewed..

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #71
73. is there any doubt when they stay at the embassy that it is state-owned
lot stock and barrel?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #71
75. They won't interview with them because "Lou Dobbs won't shut up"
Honest!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #75
81. yes, i recall that statement now. te he.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #75
84. I saw that - it was great - he was pissed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
78. yuk fox
Edited on Thu Feb-23-06 01:26 PM by cal04
one case sent to this review
get those examples: Clinton
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
79. Clinton: "Definition of National Security is a moving target"
PERFECT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #79
82. I snorted when I heard that!
Hee hee hee - I hope the media caught that snip.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #79
99. yes. good one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
85. There you have it! Warner just said no problem
(or words to that effect)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #85
86. He calls that a "full disclosure"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
87. lets have few nominations for the last afternoon people. I have to leave
soon. Thanks for the conversation all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
88. GOOD finally someone asks about the public
Edited on Thu Feb-23-06 01:32 PM by cal04
on this
do you understand the public's sensitivity
they are certainly legitiment
blaming the papers I think that's what he was trying to do
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #88
95. Pacifica radio:Hillary answered great
Hillary answers post 911 world. sometimes used as a political attack
We do live in a post 911 world there is now a reason for scrutiny
the track record not the nationality, of gov owned entities
we don't let them do it for our airports
this is NOT directed at any country
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
92. a press person is asking for documents and Warner seems to say yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
94. Whow==Hil--this in not about race--but the track record of UAE/company
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suffragette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #94
97. And she completely confronted and turned the whole
post-911 meme back on them.
Good job, Senator Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #97
100. I raise a glass to HIL. She done good today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suffragette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #100
103. And a glass to you, too, for this thread
I just came in on the end of it and appreciate that it is here so I can catch up on the whole thing.
:toast: to you and Senator Clinton
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
96. Warner--we need to look at the 'ambuity of the law"---GEECH--so now
it is law problem.

NSA all over again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #96
102. a Dem is first caller to cspan Call in now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #96
106. Screw Warner. Time to pack your bags, you rat bastard.
Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
104. hey was that a Repug saying that America needs a fresh breath of air after
listening to his hearing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JesterCS Donating Member (627 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #104
105. Independant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #104
107. I missed it - what was the context?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JesterCS Donating Member (627 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #107
109. Basically
Independant caller said we need to impeach bush and start fresh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #104
108. Clinton talking to press so csapn is letting us listen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #108
110. she is explaining the 45 day bill that is being proposed says it has
support unless there is 'some move by the administration"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #110
112. Hil:--she is amazed that no one in Adm. thinks this could affect nat. se
curity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #112
113. says, not one person raised one red flag!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
111. bill should be out by next week
Hillary just said
Byrd amendment this COULD affect national security which NO one thought
I find that hard to believe
so do We Hillary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suffragette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #111
114. "on the face of it, it could affect national security"
well-said, Hillary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #111
116. but she also said 'unless the WH makes a move"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #116
117. meaning the WH could (if use brains)-call for the 45 day review.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
115. I'll be surprised if they get more than one call
in favor of this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JesterCS Donating Member (627 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #115
118. Current caller
says port deal is prepositioning for Iran war
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #118
119. republican appalled and about to change parties
whoa
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JesterCS Donating Member (627 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #115
120. lol repub is about to swith to dem
said so on fone. =D Ex-port worker from San Diego
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #120
124. Independent from FLa
the elephant in the room
why is it the USA can not have anAmerican company
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #124
128. excellent question
and a good one to come up at a time when more and more Americans are feeling threatened by outsourcing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #115
121. two callers saying they are scared by what they heard (not heard) today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #121
122. and one was a Repug saying he was ready to switch to Dem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #122
123. he basically said that the Adm panal was incompetant!!!! whow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JesterCS Donating Member (627 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #121
126. the one Indenpendant
Edited on Thu Feb-23-06 01:51 PM by JesterCS
caller got pretty belligerant lol. Saying how dare we hand our ports to a foreign country
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
125. Indep. caller asking why we have to outsource everything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #125
127. caller--appalled that people on panal think nat. secur. NOT affected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #127
129. gee, i do not think the Repug callers are agreeing with the Dems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #129
132. Indep caller wants American conpanies to bid on these sales.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #132
135. he also said that we need to consider if these are kickbacks to Bush
family (Saudi connections)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #135
137. Okay, which one of you is calling the Independent line?
;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #125
130. Bingo All about money
democrat
these people we can't trust them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
131. Folks, I don't think this little charade Warner put on helped one
bit. People are pissed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #131
133. expect WH backpedaling to begin shortly.
btw, exactly who DID approve this deal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #133
136. Cheney? during a bout of PTSD resulting from the trauma he
experienced after shooting Whittington?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JesterCS Donating Member (627 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #131
134. Independant
says Its more like Bush/Royal Family than capability of a company to take care of ports
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #134
138. well, Warner just lost! (he and the WH panal)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #138
139. Dems one; WH/Warner ZIPPO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #131
140. I think you're right, even the repubs don't want
Edited on Thu Feb-23-06 01:56 PM by cal04
a foreign country at our ports
I just can't understand how they can talk about 911 and war on terror
for five years and expect people to accept this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #140
141. i am hoping this is the straw that breaks the camels back!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #141
142.  we still have work to do on those
Edited on Thu Feb-23-06 02:11 PM by cal04
sheep who still don't want to open their eyes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC