Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The White House trying to get rid of Fitzgerald?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 11:04 PM
Original message
The White House trying to get rid of Fitzgerald?
I just heard an AAR news report stating the White House is claiming that Fitzgerald's indictment towards Libby was UnConstitutional because Fitzgerald was not appointed by Bush or approved by the Senate. Are they trying to get rid of him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. I thought it was Libby's defense attourney making that claim.
Edited on Thu Feb-23-06 11:07 PM by Marr
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. It might've been them
They're claiming the indictment is UnConstitutional since he (Fitzgerald) wasn't appointed by Bush and/or the Senate. The guy was talking so fast so it might have been them. :blush:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #6
37. Yes what a load!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sal Minella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. Approved by the Senate??? Can't we just call Fitz a "recess appointment?"
Like so since when is this outfit concerned about what's Constitutional and what's not???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. Nope.
Not accurate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spindrifter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 11:16 PM
Original message
I stand corrected. But,
as Acting AG, did Comey have full authority to appoint a special P?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
19. Yes.
Absolutely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spindrifter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Whew!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. This is also on RawStory
Where in the Constitution does it says anything about this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. It doesn't
the busco needs to read the Constitution before
making claims on what it contains .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. The Bush administration
did not make the claim being attributed to it on this thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 01:26 AM
Response to Reply #15
28. I understand it was Libby's Lawyer who said it
sorry if it was perceived as missinfo ...I use that term broadly
kind of like I use freepers for anyone with a bush sticker or
who defends bush , regardless of any web travels to freeper land .

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. It's hard to read when it's piss-blurred.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spindrifter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 11:08 PM
Response to Original message
5. I looked up
special prosecutor in Wikipedia and if they are right, the position can be appointed by the Attorney General or Congress. Fitzg was appointed by Alberto Gonzalez. I think this is an effort by Libby's attorneys to try to extract him from his peril.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Nope. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Not Gonzalez but Ashcroft
Ashcroft was the general at this point in time and he rescued himself and had the deputy guy appoint Fitzgerald.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Nope.
Ashcroft recused himself. He did not have any role in Fitzgerald being appointed. James Comey did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Finally, someone get's it right
Fitzgerald has EQUAL POWER of the A.G. with one exception: He CAN NOT BE FIRED BY BUSH or anyone in the administration.

He can, however, be impeached.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Almost correct.
Bush can fire him, but it would have to be for making a serious error.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #17
24. Have you seen this?
http://citizenspook.blogspot.com/2005/08/treasongate-us-attorney-generals.html

Comey granted Fitzgerald Plenary Powers outside the scope of the statute. This analysis covers why this is important and why it means Fitzgerald could only be removed through a formal impeachment process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 01:30 AM
Response to Reply #24
29. So the only way Fitzgerald goes is if Bush goes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 08:21 AM
Response to Reply #29
31. No, sorry, Fitzgerald can be impeached, just like any other
Edited on Fri Feb-24-06 08:23 AM by berni_mccoy
member of the Administration. But Congress isn't even remotely likely to do that. That's the only way he can be removed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 08:37 AM
Response to Reply #24
35. I do not
consider that site serious. Again, with absolutely any chance of being wrong - none - Bush can remove Fitzgerald for cause. If one wants a model, look back to the Watergate era.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. Which Means This Atempt by Libby's Defense is a Desperate Move
Do they have a case?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. No.
Not at all. See my thread (View from a park bench) for an accurate descripion of what this is about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JanusAscending Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 12:21 AM
Response to Reply #18
27. I love a man of few words, when that's all it takes!!
Hi Waterman! Glad to see you here, keeping us all correctly informed. :hi: DC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #18
38. Got It H2O
Thank you once again. I'll be waiting for your updates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. No Fitz was appointed by Comey after Ashcroft recused himself.
Fitz has plenary authority, which basically means, for the Plame case he IS the acting Attorney General. Comey covered his ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woodsprite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
12. Fitz better hurry up or they'll find some way to toast his butt.
All this crap is getting to be too much lately - with health issues, and this insane administration, work stress of micromanagement, etc. Gotta take a break, but I'm afraid I'll miss something important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. Defense lawyers
almost always file a motion to dismiss any serious charges. It is routine. Team Libby filed perhaps the most feeble motions that I have ever heard of. Tomorrow the judge will dismiss each of the silly things in about 2 minutes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
20. Frankly....
They are just throwing shit at the wall, hoping something sticks. I guess their attempts at graymail aren't going over so big.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justice Is Comin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
23. David Schuster
on Hardball said they don't have a prayer in hell of having it thrown out.

Libby's lawyers look like a bunch of idiots to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 01:31 AM
Response to Reply #23
30. Thanks for that
Edited on Fri Feb-24-06 01:31 AM by FreedomAngel82
Whew. I heard this and was going to have a heartattack. Wouldn't they have found a way before he got indicted to get rid of him? Why now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Texacrat Donating Member (286 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
25. If the White House wanted to get rid of Fitzgerald ...
They would pardon Libby, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JanusAscending Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #25
26. Can't pardon him until he's been convicted!!!
in my humble opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 08:25 AM
Response to Reply #26
32. Actually, pardons can be given even before charges are filed.
Nixon was never formally charged is one example.
Lincoln's pardon of the troops of the confederate army was a blanket pardon as well (and many were never charged or convicted when the pardon came).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lochloosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #25
33. A pardon of Libby would not get rid of Fitz.
He still has rove in his sights. IMO Buckshot Dick is not off the hook.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
34. Nixon's Saturday Night Massacre didn't play well
They're looking for a different way to do it. Nixon's firing of his special prosecutor is widely considered a tipping point in the Watergate scandal, such a clear indication of a cover-up that it could no longer be ignored. If Bush tries the same shit albeit just using different methods, he'll face a similar backlash.

Oh, wait...what am I thinking? Bush doesn't care about backlashes, and he never faces any reality. Never mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
36. Chimp is on record praising Fitzgerald and the way he has
conducted the investigation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #36
39. Yeah.
And if he turns around and get rid of Fitz, he'll become a flip flopper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC