Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I never cease to overestimate the moral character of *

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-04-06 03:27 PM
Original message
I never cease to overestimate the moral character of *
Edited on Wed Jan-04-06 03:27 PM by undeterred
I've despised him since I first heard of the remarks he made regarding Karla Faye Tucker's execution. I have no respect for the man at all. But every year I find out something which is even worse about him. The warrantless spying is the last straw.

How could this man of such low moral fibre even be nominated for president?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TallahasseeGrannie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-04-06 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. I've given that a lot of thought
because I happily assumed Al Gore would be President for eight years. And.. then... this...man. What the hell?

But I think he sneaked in the back door (and I am not talking stolen elections because I have no idea whether they were or weren't..I have no facts and my opinion isn't worth much) because he just came out of nowhere and had no history. Except a famous daddy and a name that opened doors.

In America we like the clean slate now and then. And we thought this guy (or some folks did, evidently) was clean.

George Bush snookered America, I believe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jara sang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-04-06 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. He used to stand up on tables drunk at parties and moon people.
When he was involved in the College Republicans. What a heathen. What a barbarian.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thtwudbeme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-04-06 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yep, and now he is "mooning" the entire world
what a jackass this ridiculous little man is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-04-06 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. He's a spoiled rich brat
who you might expect to have a role in the family business but never succeed at anything he was truly in charge of.

Its too bad the Bushes consider the presidency their family business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-04-06 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
4. I believe he was groomed as the presidential nominee because
of his name recognition and the fact that PNAC could use him to reach the goals that they had tried to achieve since Bush I was in office. It was all part of a larger plan for world domination by a select few.

Should I be wearing my tin foil hat?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-04-06 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. No, I think you're right
The one thing I always thought about him is that he is spectacularly unambitious. Look at Clinton or Gore or Kerry or Dean or any of the Dem wannabe president types and you find individuals of immense intelligence and ambition. Look at George and you see someone who wants all of the power and none of the work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-04-06 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. not at all, and yes he is only a tool, an evil tool, a bad tool,but a tool
none the less
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-04-06 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. No, you're absolutely correct on this one!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurpleChez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-06-06 02:20 AM
Response to Reply #4
12. But couldn't they have groomed Jeb?
He's relatively articulate and seems to be able to read. And he believes all their crap -- even helped formulate it. Folks will say that W is PNAC's empty vessel, their Zoolander, but why did they pick a simpleton who could be manipulated when they could have had his competent brother who already believed the same shit anyway and didn't need to be manipulated? Ah well....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurpleChez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-04-06 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
7. I've said it before and I'll say it again...
but this man could be caught on videotape molesting make-a-wish kids in a bathroom at disneyland and all he would have to do would be to stare into the news cameras, make his eyes all big, grin, and simply say "Jesus" -- and NASCAR Nation would instantly forgive every sin -- in fact, they'd probably find a way to blame the kids for tempting such a godly man. We've all got double standards when it comes to how we see 'our guys' vs. 'their guys.' But the double standards developed by the Thugs in support of bushCo have long since reached a level that strikes me as psychotic. The description of them as bushbots or rushbots is apt -- they will do whatever they are told, think whatever they are told.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-04-06 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. I have asked this question of many people and have yet to get
an answer. What has Bush done to convince anyone that he is the godly man that they think he is? As far as I can tell, he has claimed to be a "born again Christian", but I can't see anything in his behavior that supports that claim.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurpleChez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-04-06 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I know!
In the 2004 campaign we kept hearing that * was the Only One who could do this or that, the only one strong enough, etc., etc. And I kept yelling "Based on WHAT???!!!??? What has this buffoon done to display all of these marvelous traits???" * was, arguably, the least qualified man ever to enter the Presidency; the idea that he has some special -- even unique -- qualifications is absurd. If he could be trained for the job so could my dog. And he's never killed anyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-06-06 02:43 AM
Response to Reply #7
15. WHY The fuck do you have to bring NASCAR into this??
I know lots of NASCAR fans who fucking hate Bush, so step off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurpleChez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-06-06 07:09 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. What the fuck part of the country are you from? Sounds like heaven.
I don't doubt that there are race fans that don't like Bush, but in my corner of the American Southeast "W" stickers are synonymous with magnetic ribbon decals displayed sideways are synonymous with "In Memory of '3'" stickers. And '8'. And '24'. And all of the other numbers pasted all over their cars and trucks by people who take their enjoyment of racing WAY TOO SERIOUSLY. (Your reaction reminds me of some the sports nuts I have known: tell 'em you don't believe in their god and they'll be OK, but tell 'em you don't follow the Steelers and the flip freaking out.) Please don't tell me that my post was the first time you've seen NASCAR and Rethugs linked -- it was an issue in the 2004 campaign for pete's sake (although Dem Senator Graham also campaigned at races).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-06-06 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. (Probably because there are ten times as many NASCAR fans...)
> WHY The fuck do you have to bring NASCAR into this??
> I know lots of NASCAR fans who fucking hate Bush, so step off.

Probably because there are ten times as many NASCAR fans
who *LOVE* Bush. Not all stereotypes are wrong.

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwb970 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-06-06 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #15
20. Every NASCAR fan I know is also a Bushbot.
I don't know what brings these two things together, but there is something about cars roaring around in circles that attracts right-wingers. Saying it ain't so don't change nothin'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurpleChez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-06-06 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. Thank you!
Edited on Fri Jan-06-06 10:45 AM by PurpleChez
I don't want to waste too much time debating a fellow DU'er about something that was an incidental part of a posting, but I challenge anybody to go into a blue collar bar in my region while they're televising a race -- hell! go into ANY bar in this region while they're televising a race -- and find three Kerry voters or a single Cindy Sheehan supporter. Again, I'm sure not EVERY race fan is a bushbot but it is highly disingenuous to deny that NASCAR doesn't fit into the whole Toby Keith, Shockin' Y'all, war fetishist, go team, kill an ay-rab for Jesus subculture that still has a decent portion of the country in its grips. It's a cyclical, self-reinforcing thing: every little bit helps the bushbots convince themselves that they're right, because they watch, read, listen to the Right Things. I have very good friends who are race fans and, sorry to say, this pegs them: they would seem to be pro-legalization live-and-let-live libertarians, but when it comes to voting it's GOP all the way. ALL THE WAY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-06-06 02:35 AM
Response to Original message
13. because repukes and the religiously insane
have no moral fibre either
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lpbk2713 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-06-06 02:39 AM
Response to Original message
14. How could this man of such low moral fibre even be nominated for president



Easy. He was the best the rethugs had to offer at convention time.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StraightDope Donating Member (716 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-06-06 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
17. Your first mistake was thinking that * had a shred of decency...
In the first place. Once you realize that for all intents and purposes, the man has no sense of right and wrong, and by extension, no soul, then it's easy to not get shocked at his ever more egregious actions.

SD
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-06-06 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
19. I think that they thought that Poppy would keep him in line
I honestly believe that. I think that they thought they would have a younger body to sport around for photo ops, but that poppy would really be running things through blivet**. That might have been how it started out but blivet** didn't want to play along. He wanted to set himself apart for poppy and better him in history's eyes. Then he got really out of control.

Sort of like the movie DAVE. They get this imposter to fill the seat thinking they can control him by telling him what to do but he fools them all and does what he wants anyway because, well, he IS the President after all. He started to beleive his own press and when it was bad, he bought better.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC