Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kimmitz's "Long War"--Who's ideology is it?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-26-06 05:35 AM
Original message
Kimmitz's "Long War"--Who's ideology is it?
This Brig. Gen. Kimmitz gave a speech this past week to a group of business people--probably all defense contractors. He keeps referring to this "long war" (it's being rebroadcast on CSPAN now) and that it is a war of ideologies. Whose ideology? I see several agendas, but I wouldn't call it an ideological war beyond the ideological insanity of the neocons, who think they have a mission to save the world, one state at a time. Otherwise, it's about which countries are sitting on top of a pile of oil. That's not ideology, that's thievery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
doublethink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-26-06 05:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. The Quadrennial Defense Review ......
"Confronting Islam, in fact, is precisely the perspective put forward in the new the Quadrennial Defense Review--the Pentagon's strategic document that comes out for a "long war" against terrorism.

"The enemies in this war are not traditional conventional military forces, but rather dispersed, global terrorist networks that exploit Islam to advance radical political aims," the document declares. "These enemies have the avowed aim of acquiring and using nuclear and biological weapons to murder hundreds of thousands of Americans and others around the world...Currently, Iraq and Afghanistan are crucial battlegrounds, but the struggle extends far beyond their borders. With its allies and partners, the United States must be prepared to wage this war in many locations simultaneously, and for some years to come."

* * *

SOME YEARS to come. That phrase should dispel any illusion that the U.S. occupation of Iraq will come to an end without much more pressure from the antiwar movement in the U.S., as well as the Iraqi resistance
-snip-

That was taken from the middle of this article just out ....."Global War For Some Years To Come"

http://www.counterpunch.org/sustar02252006.html Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-26-06 06:06 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. And its
"And it's one, two, three,
What are we fighting for ?
Don't ask me, I don't give a damn"

We need to start asking the public some of the same questions asked during a long and illegal war in Vietnam.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC