|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
masmdu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-26-06 09:48 AM Original message |
Great News!!! Solar Power Breakthrough! Much Cheaper! Great Efficency!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Backlash Cometh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-26-06 09:52 AM Response to Original message |
1. So, what country has a good relationship with South Africa? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tsuki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-26-06 10:40 AM Response to Reply #1 |
20. Germany, as I understand, will help with construction and license |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Backlash Cometh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-26-06 10:42 AM Response to Reply #20 |
23. That makes sense. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flygal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-26-06 11:55 AM Response to Reply #20 |
39. Germany already working with Australians on this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-26-06 09:54 AM Response to Original message |
2. Saw this a few days ago, same article. I've been trying to get more |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewJeffCT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-26-06 09:55 AM Response to Reply #2 |
3. I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stop the bleeding (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-26-06 09:59 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Yep - this would be great if it can be verified. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FormerDittoHead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-26-06 10:04 AM Response to Reply #5 |
9. It was patented... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Backlash Cometh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-26-06 10:13 AM Response to Reply #9 |
13. Wasn't there another scandal regarding our patent system? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
immoderate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-26-06 11:10 AM Response to Reply #9 |
27. In short, no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nothing Without Hope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-27-06 12:18 AM Response to Reply #9 |
79. No, being patented is no guarantee that it works. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jose Diablo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-26-06 09:58 AM Response to Original message |
4. Sounds good |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-26-06 10:00 AM Response to Original message |
6. More Info Here: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-26-06 10:14 AM Response to Reply #6 |
14. it is looking better. Here's to hope... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jose Diablo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-26-06 02:09 PM Response to Reply #6 |
50. About a buck and a half per watt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
misternormal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-26-06 03:06 PM Response to Reply #50 |
54. Considering "trickle down"... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
itchyvet (19 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-01-06 08:23 AM Response to Reply #6 |
104. Solar stuff. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rex_Goodheart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-26-06 10:02 AM Response to Original message |
7. That would be the news of the new century.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ewagner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-26-06 10:03 AM Response to Original message |
8. I've been looking for more info |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-26-06 10:13 AM Response to Reply #8 |
12. I Googled this up: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ewagner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-26-06 01:22 PM Response to Reply #12 |
46. Thank you! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-26-06 01:35 PM Response to Reply #46 |
48. I see an opportunity...See post #29... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OneTwentyoNine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-26-06 10:12 AM Response to Original message |
10. US Oil and Energy companies will buy exclusive rights in America |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FormerDittoHead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-26-06 10:23 AM Response to Reply #10 |
15. You broke the 'code'... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gizmo1979 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-26-06 10:33 AM Response to Reply #10 |
18. They will never let it hit the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-26-06 10:41 AM Response to Reply #18 |
22. Well, the American/British energy interests would want to kill it, BUT.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
buddysmellgood (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-26-06 11:44 AM Response to Reply #22 |
37. China is investing bigtime in solar. They won't pay attention to patents |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glitch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-26-06 12:08 PM Response to Reply #22 |
41. I love your sense of irony. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-26-06 12:15 PM Response to Reply #41 |
42. Kinda like cornering the Rubber Tree market..only to have synthetic latex. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glitch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-26-06 12:30 PM Response to Reply #42 |
43. lol nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mitchtv (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-26-06 03:34 PM Response to Reply #22 |
58. BP is a major installer of Solar Panels here in Socal desert |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-26-06 04:23 PM Response to Reply #58 |
60. Let's see how they react to this new technology... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-26-06 04:31 PM Response to Reply #60 |
61. Shell has sold its EU silicon PV business and is pursuing CIS Big Time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-26-06 12:00 PM Response to Reply #10 |
40. Or they purchase the rights to distribute it, and then just sit on it,,,,, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zalinda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-26-06 10:12 AM Response to Original message |
11. Not going to do me much good unless I move |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeFree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-26-06 11:19 AM Response to Reply #11 |
31. Consider this, zalinda |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trof (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-26-06 10:24 AM Response to Original message |
16. more info: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-27-06 11:12 AM Response to Reply #16 |
92. That's about 3 times cheaper than they are today. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
texanshatingbush (435 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-26-06 10:28 AM Response to Original message |
17. This and cold fusion would make a hell of a combination |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-26-06 10:36 AM Response to Reply #17 |
19. So far, the science is checking out... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mr_Spock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-26-06 11:07 AM Response to Reply #17 |
26. You have a Hummer and Exxon stock? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemoTex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-26-06 10:41 AM Response to Original message |
21. " ..stoves, geysers, lights, TVs, fridges, computers .." Geysers? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-26-06 10:51 AM Response to Reply #21 |
24. LOL - I think you've got it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IronLionZion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-26-06 03:07 PM Response to Reply #21 |
55. Yes, the former British colonies call them geysers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemExpat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-26-06 05:50 PM Response to Reply #21 |
69. Lol....we have 4 gas geysers in our house to heat our water... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-26-06 11:03 AM Response to Original message |
25. Company Website (in German and with Google translation) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-26-06 11:18 AM Response to Reply #25 |
29. Looks like they're looking for investors for solar energy stations: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IDemo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-26-06 11:14 AM Response to Original message |
28. Cost per watt = $1.30 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jackpine Radical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-26-06 11:27 AM Response to Reply #28 |
32. That would be something on the order of say 40-50 amps. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-26-06 11:32 AM Response to Reply #32 |
34. If you check the companies' website, they seem to be more interested... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Leopolds Ghost (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-27-06 12:20 AM Response to Reply #34 |
80. Of course, that's where the money is -- re-selling electricity |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IDemo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-26-06 11:46 AM Response to Reply #32 |
38. That may be, if you're planning on being totally 'off-grid' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RandiFan1290 (721 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-26-06 11:19 AM Response to Original message |
30. That is great news! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oneold1-4u (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-26-06 11:28 AM Response to Original message |
33. If this is for real |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trof (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-26-06 11:37 AM Response to Original message |
35. You also get a tax break. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sam sarrha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-26-06 11:38 AM Response to Original message |
36. The USA developed a new vacuum tube parabolic collector that runs around |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RebelOne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-26-06 12:43 PM Response to Original message |
44. When I was a kid, I lived in a solar-powered house |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-26-06 01:11 PM Response to Reply #44 |
45. Solar as a single-home off-the-grid solution is dumb, BUT... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eppur_se_muova (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-26-06 05:42 PM Response to Reply #45 |
68. Dumb? Check this out. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-27-06 08:15 AM Response to Reply #68 |
84. The reference you cite makes my point. I was reacting to someone... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eppur_se_muova (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-27-06 01:53 PM Response to Reply #84 |
97. Gotcha. You mean "off-the-grid" literally, completely. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Leopolds Ghost (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-27-06 12:33 AM Response to Reply #45 |
81. If they are failing to account for transmission losses... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kestrel91316 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-26-06 02:57 PM Response to Reply #44 |
51. It sounds like you had solar water heating, which is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RebelOne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-27-06 08:52 AM Response to Reply #51 |
86. Yes, it was solar water heating, but this was not in the 70s. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skids (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-26-06 01:24 PM Response to Original message |
47. Good news, but overhyped. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-26-06 01:59 PM Response to Reply #47 |
49. CIGS is well-established tech. What's new seems to be in manufacturing... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skids (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-26-06 04:51 PM Response to Reply #49 |
62. It's not new, that's the thing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eppur_se_muova (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-26-06 05:34 PM Response to Reply #62 |
67. DayStar?? Used to sell CPU upgrades as DayStar Digital?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skids (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-26-06 11:56 PM Response to Reply #67 |
77. daystartech.com n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eppur_se_muova (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-27-06 02:02 PM Response to Reply #77 |
98. Thanks. I wonder if they sold their brand name, or what ? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Leopolds Ghost (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-27-06 12:15 AM Response to Reply #62 |
78. Sputtering?! Bu - But - Please explain what you are talking about n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skids (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-27-06 12:44 AM Response to Reply #78 |
83. Not sure if that was merely a pun. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tesha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-27-06 10:22 AM Response to Reply #83 |
88. That's essentially correct, but spraypainting at the atomic level. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karlrschneider (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-27-06 04:08 PM Response to Reply #88 |
101. Basically the same technology we use to put antireflective coatings on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
roguevalley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-26-06 03:01 PM Response to Original message |
52. I want one. I will be a test case for an arctic application |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-26-06 03:25 PM Response to Reply #52 |
57. Do you speak German? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
roguevalley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-26-06 09:00 PM Response to Reply #57 |
73. no. but I can find someone who does. Thank you so much. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skids (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-26-06 05:09 PM Response to Reply #52 |
65. These are the same technology: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IDemo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-26-06 03:01 PM Response to Original message |
53. Concentrated solar (solar-thermal) is still more efficient: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skids (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-26-06 05:04 PM Response to Reply #53 |
64. In a year or two the two techs will be neck and neck. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gold Metal Flake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-27-06 03:43 PM Response to Reply #64 |
100. The Sun Ball and other fresnel lense concentrator configs... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Emit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-26-06 03:12 PM Response to Original message |
56. Bush* alluded to something like this in that speech he gave recently |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
this_side_up (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-26-06 03:43 PM Response to Original message |
59. A couple of years ago, one of the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dysfunctional press (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-26-06 05:00 PM Response to Reply #59 |
63. that's probably another reason they want nukes so bad- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stickdog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-26-06 05:17 PM Response to Original message |
66. Kick (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maru Kitteh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-26-06 06:15 PM Response to Original message |
70. Cool. Where do I buy these? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mom cat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-26-06 07:55 PM Response to Reply #70 |
71. Me too. I have been wanting to go solar, but the cost was too much. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
corporate_mike (812 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-26-06 08:03 PM Response to Reply #70 |
72. I'd buy them tomorrow if they were available at Home Depot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnaries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-26-06 10:43 PM Response to Original message |
74. So, how are Bush & Cheney going to keep them out of the US? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poiuyt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-26-06 10:56 PM Response to Original message |
75. That's fine for South Africa, what about those of us who live in the North |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Yossarian Joad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-27-06 12:36 AM Response to Reply #75 |
82. Move South? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-27-06 10:55 AM Response to Reply #75 |
89. They discussed this in the article... Cape Town has winters too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BigBearJohn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-26-06 11:20 PM Response to Original message |
76. This made my YEAR --- THANKS!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftHander (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-27-06 08:48 AM Response to Original message |
85. Solar Powered Old Faithful!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftHander (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-27-06 08:53 AM Response to Original message |
87. this IS awesome... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goclark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-27-06 11:04 AM Response to Original message |
90. How I wish Gore would be our President during this time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-27-06 11:06 AM Response to Reply #90 |
91. Clinton and Gore have both told us that America's future... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OxQQme (694 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-27-06 11:50 AM Response to Reply #91 |
95. Possible/probable ramifications |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goclark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-27-06 02:49 PM Response to Reply #91 |
99. You are so right ~ the left is lost |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dorkulon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-27-06 11:30 AM Response to Original message |
93. This just in... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-27-06 11:45 AM Response to Reply #93 |
94. LOL...Actually, there are more subtle ways.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-27-06 11:54 AM Response to Reply #94 |
96. PS: The last time around they used the John D. Rockefeller method... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mdmc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-27-06 04:13 PM Response to Original message |
102. w. did say that we would see vast breakthroughs... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
itchyvet (19 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-01-06 08:20 AM Response to Original message |
103. Solar Power Break thru. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:05 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC