Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How an obscure maritime takeover turned into political shipwreck-Newsweek

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-26-06 10:29 AM
Original message
How an obscure maritime takeover turned into political shipwreck-Newsweek
No Safe Harbor Here
How a routine sale became a political gale—and what's next for Bush in the ports storm.


Newsweek

March 6, 2006 issue - It was talk radio's Michael Savage who first alerted the president's inner circle to the supposed Arab takeover of America's ports. One of Bush's closest aides tuned in to "The Savage Nation" just before Valentine's Day, to hear the shock jock's angry caricature of how a Dubai company was going to manage terminals at six major U.S. ports. In Savage terms, the country was simply handing over its security to an Arab country complicit in the 9/11 attacks. But the Bush aide knew nothing of the government's role in approving the deal and thought little more of the rant for another week. After all, there were other crises to fret over. Vice President Dick Cheney had just shot a man while hunting quail, and GOP senators were rebelling over legislation on the domestic eavesdropping program. Nobody—from the lower-level officials reviewing the deal to the White House aides handling Congress—saw the iceberg until it was too late.

How did an obscure maritime takeover turn into a political shipwreck? First, it's election year. For the past two campaign cycles, Karl Rove has successfully painted Democrats as soft on national security. The Dubai sale offered them a golden opportunity for payback. The GOP leadership on Capitol Hill did not want to get stuck trying to explain the sale to a public anxious after hearing how little had been done to protect U.S. ports. Besieged by calls from worried constituents, they publicly broke with Bush, rushing to delay or block the deal. The math wasn't hard to do: One Rasmussen poll registered 17 percent support for the deal, and showed Bush narrowly trailing congressional Democrats on his signature issue of national security.

The White House, meanwhile, was slow to read the signs. Nobody had tracked the bidding war for the venerable British ports company called the Peninsular and Oriental Steam Navigation Co. (known as P&O). And nobody noticed an Associated Press story—on the day of Cheney's hunting incident—that aired the security concerns of a small Miami port operator called Eller. A disgruntled partner of P&O, Eller feared that an Arab government takeover could trigger a political backlash that might jeopardize its business. Its lawyers approached the Feds but were brushed aside; the security review was long complete.

more at:http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11570948/site/newsweek/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-26-06 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. The * admin fearmongering bit em in the ass
They've been very successful getting dumshito-Americans to fear and hate "ragheads" for five years. Now they want to turn around and hire out port operations to those very same "ragheads". And they're surprised when Bubba is pissed about it? Gimme a fuckin break. If they are that stupid they should quit right now and go be a greeter at a walmart in Bumfuck, Jesusland.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-26-06 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Fearless Leader will do nothing
to prevent Poppy from making a killing on this deal. I wonder who bought shares in P&O. Buyouts usually means the stock gets a good kick in the runup to the sale.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-26-06 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
3. The shipping Container transportation and handling business
is like the railroads were in the 19th Century. Fearless leader should know about that. Great Granpappy Bush ran Buckeye Steel, a company owned by the Rockefellers that made rolling stock for the railroads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-26-06 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Here's an interesting bit of history on Buckeye Steel
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patricia92243 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-26-06 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
4. So, the moral of the story is that the Republicans are not keeping a tight
enough lid on the press. Get Savage in line - PRONTO - be sure storeis like the guy in Florida do not get published - they are home free. They just slipped up a little - give them time - they'll take care of all the little loopholes.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-26-06 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
5. A Non-Democratic Decision!
Finally, the Bush Royal Family has been seen as making a decision without a true democratic process. Finally.

After all the crap that has been decided by Royal Fiat and blindly accepted by the Sheeple, this action comes like a 2 x 4 smack to the side of the Sheeple's collective heads.

There be a light at the end of the tunnel! Halle-damn-leugha!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-26-06 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
6. GLOBALIZATION takes a hit & they pull out all the stops to defend it
Edited on Sun Feb-26-06 11:10 AM by bpilgrim
Senior Bush officials (many of whom have been reading Thomas Friedman's latest book, "The World Is Flat") worried that killing the deal would alienate trading partners and imperil the president's economic agenda.


as long as they are secured in their bunkers, who cares about weTHEpeople?

the stage is being set for a populous leader to take the throne... they must be scared to death :evilgrin:

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-26-06 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
7. Notice how Newsweak editorializes about "disgruntled" whistleblower
A disgruntled partner of P&O, Eller feared that an Arab government takeover could trigger a political backlash that might jeopardize its business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC