why should anyone pay you any attention when you wise up in 2006? Idiots! Shameless wastes of space!
http://www.tpmcafe.com/node/27127#commentMatthew Yglesias
The Shocking Truth
By Matthew Yglesias | bio
Andrew Sullivan takes a gander at Steven Cambone's notes and concludes that "My confidence that there was no deliberate misleading of the American people after 9/11 just slipped a notch." What changed his mind? This:
The most revealing items, of course, are the following: in discussing whether Iraq could have been involved, the notes say: "judge whether good enough
hit S.H. at same time." Later comes: "Hard to get a good case." Then there's this: "Go massive ... Sweep it all up. Things related and not."
I agree that this is revealing, but February 2006 is a little late to get on the bus. All of these facts were reported several years ago. It's pretty clear that the public was deliberately misled to some extent. To be perfectly fair, it's hardly all that unusual for an administration to deliberately mislead the public about matters of war and peace. Fundamentally, if invading Iraq had proven to be a good idea I doubt there would be all that much concern about the president's honesty. The basic problem is that the war wasn't a good idea. The lying is sort of icing on the cake.